IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i19p7232-d423277.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Oxytocin Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Early Parental Bonding Interact in Shaping Instagram Social Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Bonassi

    (Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy
    Mobile and Social Computing Lab, Bruno Kessler Foundation, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Ilaria Cataldo

    (Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy)

  • Giulio Gabrieli

    (Psychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639818, Singapore)

  • Jia N. Foo

    (Human Genetics, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore
    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308222, Singapore)

  • Bruno Lepri

    (Mobile and Social Computing Lab, Bruno Kessler Foundation, 38122 Trento, Italy)

  • Gianluca Esposito

    (Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto, Italy
    Psychology Program, School of Social Sciences, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 639818, Singapore
    Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore 308222, Singapore)

Abstract

Human beings engage in multiple social interactions daily, both in person and online. There are, however, individual differences in the frequency and quality of these interactions. This exploratory study focuses on online interactions and aims to model these differences by looking at potential environmental and genetic factors. The environmental factor is the childhood parental relationship, as reported by the participants in the dimensions of the Parental Bonding Instrument ( N = 57, 41 females). At a genetic level, buccal mucosa cell samples were collected to assess participants’ genetic susceptibility, and OXTr regions rs2254298 (G/G homozygotes vs. A-carriers) and rs53576 (A/A homozygotes vs. G-carriers) were analyzed. To capture participants’ online activity, Instagram was probed. The number of people that the individual follows (“followings”), followers, and posts were used as a proxy for the quantity of interaction, and a Social Desirability Index (SDI) was computed as the ratio of followers to followings. An interaction between OXTr groups and parental bonding scores on the number of followings and posts was hypothesized. A gene-environment interaction for OXTr/rs2254298 on the number of Instagram posts was identified. In line with the hypothesis, participants with a genetic risk factor (A-carriers) and a history of low paternal care showed fewer Instagram posts than those without this risk factor (G/G genotype). Moreover, an interaction effect between maternal overprotection and OXTr/rs2254298 on the Instagram SDI was detected. These findings could represent an indirect pathway through which genes and parental behavior interact to shape social interactions on Instagram.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Bonassi & Ilaria Cataldo & Giulio Gabrieli & Jia N. Foo & Bruno Lepri & Gianluca Esposito, 2020. "Oxytocin Receptor Gene Polymorphisms and Early Parental Bonding Interact in Shaping Instagram Social Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-20, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7232-:d:423277
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7232/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/19/7232/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jingguang Li & Yajun Zhao & Rena Li & Lucas S Broster & Chenglin Zhou & Suyong Yang, 2015. "Association of Oxytocin Receptor Gene (OXTR) rs53576 Polymorphism with Sociality: A Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Birk Diedenhofen & Jochen Musch, 2015. "cocor: A Comprehensive Solution for the Statistical Comparison of Correlations," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(4), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Bonassi & Alessandro Carollo & Ilaria Cataldo & Giulio Gabrieli & Moses Tandiono & Jia Nee Foo & Bruno Lepri & Gianluca Esposito, 2021. "Modulation of Instagram Number of Followings by Avoidance in Close Relationships in Young Adults under a Gene x Environment Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Andrea Bonassi & Ilaria Cataldo & Giulio Gabrieli & Moses Tandiono & Jia Nee Foo & Bruno Lepri & Gianluca Esposito, 2022. "The Interaction between Serotonin Transporter Allelic Variation and Maternal Care Modulates Instagram Sociability in a Sample of Singaporean Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anthony Evans & Willem Sleegers & Žan Mlakar, 2020. "Individual differences in receptivity to scientific bullshit," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 401-412, May.
    2. Walters, William H., 2017. "Do subjective journal ratings represent whole journals or typical articles? Unweighted or weighted citation impact?," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 730-744.
    3. Kathrin Leppek & Gun Woo Byeon & Wipapat Kladwang & Hannah K. Wayment-Steele & Craig H. Kerr & Adele F. Xu & Do Soon Kim & Ved V. Topkar & Christian Choe & Daphna Rothschild & Gerald C. Tiu & Roger We, 2022. "Combinatorial optimization of mRNA structure, stability, and translation for RNA-based therapeutics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Kevin Handtke & Lisa Richter-Beuschel & Susanne Bögeholz, 2022. "Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Teaching ESD: A Theory-Driven Instrument and the Effectiveness of ESD in German Teacher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-32, May.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:2:p:193-202 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Alan E. Stewart & Harrison E. Chapman & Jackson B. L. Davis, 2023. "Anxiety and Worry about Six Categories of Climate Change Impacts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(1), pages 1-24, December.
    7. Dang,Hai-Anh H. & Pullinger,John James & Serajuddin,Umar & Stacy,Brian William, 2024. "Reviewing Assessment Tools for Measuring Country Statistical Capacity," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10717, The World Bank.
    8. Kristina M. Garske & Asha Kar & Caroline Comenho & Brunilda Balliu & David Z. Pan & Yash V. Bhagat & Gregory Rosenberg & Amogha Koka & Sankha Subhra Das & Zong Miao & Janet S. Sinsheimer & Jaakko Kapr, 2023. "Increased body mass index is linked to systemic inflammation through altered chromatin co-accessibility in human preadipocytes," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Maike Stolz & Christian Albus & Manfred E. Beutel & Hans-Christian Deter & Kurt Fritzsche & Christoph Herrmann-Lingen & Matthias Michal & Katja Petrowski & Joram Ronel & Jobst-Hendrik Schultz & Wolfga, 2023. "Assessment of health-related quality of life in individuals with depressive symptoms: validity and responsiveness of the EQ-5D-3L and the SF-6D," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 24(8), pages 1297-1307, November.
    10. Les Sikos & Noortje J Venhuizen & Heiner Drenhaus & Matthew W Crocker, 2021. "Reevaluating pragmatic reasoning in language games," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(3), pages 1-33, March.
    11. Kay, Adam A. & Skarlicki, Daniel P., 2020. "Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 8-20.
    12. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:401-412 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Wenke, Kathrin & Zapkau, Florian B. & Schwens, Christian, 2021. "Too small to do it all? A meta-analysis on the relative relationships of exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity with SME performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 653-665.
    14. Spampatti, Tobia & Hahnel, Ulf J.J. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Brosch, Tobias, 2022. "Short and long-term dominance of negative information in shaping public energy perceptions: The case of shallow geothermal systems," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    15. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk & Agnieszka Żabicka, 2022. "Enhancing Transformative Learning and Innovation Skills Using Remote Learning for Sustainable Architecture Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-33, March.
    16. Adam Jon Lebowitz & Shinji Sato & Miyuki Aiba, 2018. "Correlating Post-disaster Support Network Density with Reciprocal Support Relation Satisfaction: An Elderly Cohort Within One Year of the 2011 Japan Disasters," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 37(6), pages 923-939, December.
    17. S. Adil Saribay & Onurcan Yilmaz & Gülay Gözde Körpe, 2020. "Does intuitive mindset influence belief in God? A registered replication of Shenhav, Rand and Greene (2012)," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(2), pages 193-202, March.
    18. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:3:p:330-345 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Park, Sangchul & Kim, Sanghoon & Ahn, Sungsook, 2023. "Understanding the effect of art infusion type on retail product shopping: An attention to the intervening role of customers’ financial wealth," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    20. Tessa Haesevoets & Alain Van Hiel & Kim Dierckx & Chris Reinders Folmer, 2020. "Do multiple-trial games better reflect prosocial behavior than single-trial games?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(3), pages 330-345, May.
    21. Jia-Yong Zhong & Longjian Niu & Zhuo-Bin Lin & Xin Bai & Ying Chen & Feng Luo & Chunhui Hou & Chuan-Le Xiao, 2023. "High-throughput Pore-C reveals the single-allele topology and cell type-specificity of 3D genome folding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    22. Huili Sun & Rongtao Jiang & Wei Dai & Alexander J. Dufford & Stephanie Noble & Marisa N. Spann & Shi Gu & Dustin Scheinost, 2023. "Network controllability of structural connectomes in the neonatal brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-10, December.
    23. Jennifer S Dargin & Ali Mostafavi, 2020. "Human-centric infrastructure resilience: Uncovering well-being risk disparity due to infrastructure disruptions in disasters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-29, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:19:p:7232-:d:423277. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.