IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i18p6888-d416626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tracking and Analyzing Public Emotion Evolutions During COVID-19: A Case Study from the Event-Driven Perspective on Microblogs

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Li

    (Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Cong Wei

    (Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Jianning Dang

    (Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Lei Cao

    (Department of Computer Science and Technology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100085, China)

  • Li Liu

    (Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    Current address: No. 19, Xinjiekouwai Street, HaiDian District, Beijing 100875, China.)

Abstract

Objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has caused substantial panic worldwide since its outbreak in December 2019. This study uses social networks to track the evolution of public emotion during COVID-19 in China and analyzes the root causes of these public emotions from an event-driven perspective. Methods: A dataset was constructed using microblogs (n = 125,672) labeled with COVID-19-related super topics (n = 680) from 40,891 users from 1 December 2019 to 17 February 2020. Based on the skeleton and key change points of COVID-19 extracted from microblogging contents, we tracked the public’s emotional evolution modes (accumulated emotions, emotion covariances, and emotion transitions) by time phase and further extracted the details of dominant social events. Results: Public emotions showed different evolution modes during different phases of COVID-19. Events about the development of COVID-19 remained hot, but generally declined, and public attention shifted to other aspects of the epidemic (e.g., encouragement, support, and treatment). Conclusions: These findings suggest that the public’s feedback on COVID-19 predated official accounts on the microblog platform. There were clear differences in the trending events that large users (users with many fans and readings) and common users paid attention to during each phase of COVID-19.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Li & Cong Wei & Jianning Dang & Lei Cao & Li Liu, 2020. "Tracking and Analyzing Public Emotion Evolutions During COVID-19: A Case Study from the Event-Driven Perspective on Microblogs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-24, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6888-:d:416626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6888/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6888/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pan, Junshan & Liu, Ying & Liu, Xiang & Hu, Hanping, 2016. "Discriminating bot accounts based solely on temporal features of microblog behavior," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 450(C), pages 193-204.
    2. Hua Bai & Guang Yu, 2016. "A Weibo-based approach to disaster informatics: incidents monitor in post-disaster situation via Weibo text negative sentiment analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 83(2), pages 1177-1196, September.
    3. Mukherjee, Shubhadeep & Bala, Pradip Kumar, 2017. "Sarcasm detection in microblogs using Naïve Bayes and fuzzy clustering," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 19-27.
    4. Yu‐Ru Lin & Drew Margolin & Xidao Wen, 2017. "Tracking and Analyzing Individual Distress Following Terrorist Attacks Using Social Media Streams," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1580-1605, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hainan Huang & Weifan Chen & Tian Xie & Yaoyao Wei & Ziqing Feng & Weijiong Wu, 2021. "The Impact of Individual Behaviors and Governmental Guidance Measures on Pandemic-Triggered Public Sentiment Based on System Dynamics and Cross-Validation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-25, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhijie Sasha Dong & Lingyu Meng & Lauren Christenson & Lawrence Fulton, 2021. "Social media information sharing for natural disaster response," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 107(3), pages 2077-2104, July.
    2. Dajun Dai & Ruixue Wang, 2020. "Space-Time Surveillance of Negative Emotions after Consecutive Terrorist Attacks in London," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Yu-Ru Lin & Wen-Ting Chung, 2020. "The dynamics of Twitter users’ gun narratives across major mass shooting events," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Shrivastava, Mayank & Kumar, Shishir, 2021. "A pragmatic and intelligent model for sarcasm detection in social media text," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    5. Matt Baucum & Heather Rosoff & Richard John & William Burns & Paul Slovic, 2018. "Modeling public responses to soft-target transportation terror," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 239-249, June.
    6. Lian, Ying & Liu, Yijun & Dong, Xuefan, 2020. "Strategies for controlling false online information during natural disasters: The case of Typhoon Mangkhut in China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    7. Michael Greenberg & Anthony Cox & Vicki Bier & Jim Lambert & Karen Lowrie & Warner North & Michael Siegrist & Felicia Wu, 2020. "Risk Analysis: Celebrating the Accomplishments and Embracing Ongoing Challenges," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2113-2127, November.
    8. Tsan‐Ming Choi & James H. Lambert, 2017. "Advances in Risk Analysis with Big Data," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 37(8), pages 1435-1442, August.
    9. Wenjuan Sun & Paolo Bocchini & Brian D. Davison, 2020. "Applications of artificial intelligence for disaster management," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 103(3), pages 2631-2689, September.
    10. Jiexiong Duan & Weixin Zhai & Chengqi Cheng, 2020. "Crowd Detection in Mass Gatherings Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of the 2014 Shanghai New Year’s Eve Stampede," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Cen Song & Sijia Zhou & Kyle Hunt & Jun Zhuang, 2022. "Comprehensive Evolution Analysis of Public Perceptions Related to Pediatric Care: A Sina Weibo Case Study (2013–2020)," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    12. Mingjun Ma & Qiang Gao & Zishuang Xiao & Xingshuai Hou & Beibei Hu & Lifei Jia & Wenfang Song, 2023. "Analysis of public emotion on flood disasters in southern China in 2020 based on social media data," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 1013-1033, September.
    13. Yan Wang & John E. Taylor, 2018. "Coupling sentiment and human mobility in natural disasters: a Twitter-based study of the 2014 South Napa Earthquake," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 92(2), pages 907-925, June.
    14. Qingwei Xu & Kaili Xu, 2020. "Statistical Analysis and Prediction of Fatal Accidents in the Metallurgical Industry in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, May.
    15. Lida Huang & Panpan Shi & Haichao Zhu & Tao Chen, 2022. "Early detection of emergency events from social media: a new text clustering approach," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 111(1), pages 851-875, March.
    16. Lian, Ying & Tang, Huiting & Xiang, Mengting & Dong, Xuefan, 2024. "Public attitudes and sentiments toward ChatGPT in China: A text mining analysis based on social media," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:18:p:6888-:d:416626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.