IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i16p5790-d397062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Lei Xie

    (School of Management, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China)

  • Hongshuai Han

    (College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China)

Abstract

Many small manufacturing factories suffer insufficient environment-friendly capacity after eliminating the outdated and environmental-harmful production capacity according to stringent environmental rules and regulations. This paper analyzes two strategies that the manufacturer with limited environment-friendly capacity may take to tackle this problem, i.e., investing in building environment-friendly capacities and collaborating with the manufacturer with sufficient environment-friendly capacity in capacity sharing. In a supply chain with two competing manufacturers, this paper builds game-theoretical models and investigates equilibrium solutions under three scenarios (no capacity investment or sharing, capacity investment, and capacity sharing). Then this research investigates the feasible regions of these two strategies and compares the performance of each manufacturer under each scenario. The findings show that both capacity investment and capacity sharing can effectively reduce the profit loss of the manufacturer with limited capacity, while only capacity sharing benefits both manufacturers. The feasibility of these two strategies depends on the initial capacity volume and the capacity investment cost coefficient of the manufacturer with limited capacity. Moreover, the preference of the manufacturer with limited capacity for each strategy depends on the capacity investment cost coefficient. When the capacity investment cost coefficient is relatively high, the win-win situation exists for supply chain members. Furthermore, with the use of chaos theory, the paper shows how to adjust the capacity investment in each period to keep the system stable.

Suggested Citation

  • Lei Xie & Hongshuai Han, 2020. "Capacity Sharing and Capacity Investment of Environment-Friendly Manufacturing: Strategy Selection and Performance Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5790-:d:397062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5790/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/16/5790/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agiza, H.N. & Elsadany, A.A., 2003. "Nonlinear dynamics in the Cournot duopoly game with heterogeneous players," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 320(C), pages 512-524.
    2. Hach, Daniel & Chyong, Chi Kong & Spinler, Stefan, 2016. "Capacity market design options: A dynamic capacity investment model and a GB case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 691-705.
    3. Anyan Qi & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Amitabh Sinha, 2017. "Capacity Investment with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 145-164, February.
    4. Chen, Ting & Wang, Derong, 2020. "Combined application of blockchain technology in fractional calculus model of supply chain financial system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Manu Goyal & Serguei Netessine, 2007. "Strategic Technology Choice and Capacity Investment Under Demand Uncertainty," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 53(2), pages 192-207, February.
    6. Xiao, Yibin & Fu, Xiaowen & Zhang, Anming, 2013. "Demand uncertainty and airport capacity choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 91-104.
    7. Chen, Jen-Yi & Dimitrov, Stanko & Pun, Hubert, 2019. "The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 42-58.
    8. G.‐I. Bischi & M. Gallegati & A. Naimzada, 1999. "Symmetry‐breaking bifurcations and representativefirm in dynamic duopoly games," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 89(0), pages 252-271, January.
    9. Hwarng, H. Brian & Xie, Na, 2008. "Understanding supply chain dynamics: A chaos perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(3), pages 1163-1178, February.
    10. Ma, Yutian & Li, Wenwen, 2020. "Application and research of fractional differential equations in dynamic analysis of supply chain financial chaotic system," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    11. Berling, Peter & Eng-Larsson, Fredrik, 2017. "Environmental implications of transport contract choice - capacity investment and pricing under volume and capacity contracts," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 129-142.
    12. Li, Li & Zhang, Rachel Q., 2015. "Cooperation through capacity sharing between competing forwarders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 115-131.
    13. Yang, Feng & Shan, Feifei & Jin, Minyue, 2017. "Capacity investment under cost sharing contracts," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 278-285.
    14. Yang, Shu-Jung Sunny & Anderson, Edward James, 2014. "Competition through capacity investment under asymmetric existing capacities and costs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(1), pages 217-230.
    15. Yimin Yu & Saif Benjaafar & Yigal Gerchak, 2015. "Capacity Sharing and Cost Allocation among Independent Firms with Congestion," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(8), pages 1285-1310, August.
    16. Anyan Qi & Hyun-Soo Ahn & Amitabh Sinha, 2017. "Capacity Investment with Demand Learning," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(1), pages 145-164, February.
    17. Qiuxiang Li & Mengnan Shi & Yimin Huang, 2019. "A Dynamic Price Game Model in a Low-Carbon, Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Return Rates and Fairness Concern Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-21, June.
    18. A. Gürhan Kök & Kevin Shang & Şafak Yücel, 2020. "Investments in Renewable and Conventional Energy: The Role of Operational Flexibility," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 925-941, September.
    19. Xin Chen & Zhisong Chen, 2013. "Cost allocation of capacity investment games," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 60(6), pages 512-523, September.
    20. Boonman, H.J. & Hagspiel, V. & Kort, P.M., 2015. "Dedicated vs product flexible production technology: Strategic capacity investment choice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 141-152.
    21. Seok, Hyesung & Nof, Shimon Y., 2014. "Dynamic coalition reformation for adaptive demand and capacity sharing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PA), pages 136-146.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Xu & Peng, Ying & Wang, Xiaojun & Wang, Pengfei, 2024. "Capacity sharing between competing manufacturers: A collective good or a detrimental effect?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Alberto A. López-Toro & Eva María Sánchez-Teba & María Dolores Benítez-Márquez & Mercedes Rodríguez-Fernández, 2021. "Influence of ESGC Indicators on Financial Performance of Listed Pharmaceutical Companies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Xintong Wu & Zhendong Li & Fangcheng Tang, 2022. "The Effect of Carbon Price Volatility on Firm Green Transitions: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Listed Firms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Zhang, Wen & Wu, Zhibin & Zeng, Xiaojun & Zhu, Changhui, 2023. "An ensemble dynamic self-learning model for multiscale carbon price forecasting," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PC).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Xu & Peng, Ying & Wang, Xiaojun & Wang, Pengfei, 2024. "Capacity sharing between competing manufacturers: A collective good or a detrimental effect?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Aditya Vedantam & Ananth Iyer, 2021. "Capacity Investment under Bayesian Information Updates at Reporting Periods: Model and Application," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(8), pages 2707-2725, August.
    3. Baixun Li & Meng Li & Chao Liang, 2023. "Cry‐wolf syndrome in recommendation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(2), pages 347-358, February.
    4. Luciano Fanti & Luca Gori, 2013. "Stability Analysis in a Bertrand Duopoly with Different Product Quality and Heterogeneous Expectations," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 481-501, December.
    5. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca & Sodini, Mauro, 2012. "Nonlinear dynamics in a Cournot duopoly with relative profit delegation," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 45(12), pages 1469-1478.
    6. Fanti, Luciano & Gori, Luca, 2011. "The dynamics of a Bertrand duopoly with differentiated products and bounded rational firms revisited," MPRA Paper 33268, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Juanjuan Qin & Kun Wang & Ziping Wang & Liangjie Xia, 2020. "Revenue sharing contracts for horizontal capacity sharing under competition," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 731-760, August.
    8. Cerboni Baiardi, Lorenzo & Naimzada, Ahmad K., 2019. "An oligopoly model with rational and imitation rules," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 254-278.
    9. J. Prince Vijai, 2021. "Production network, technology choice, capacity investment and inventory sourcing decisions: operational hedging under demand uncertainty," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 58(4), pages 1164-1191, December.
    10. Ting-Chen Hu & Kuo-Chen Hung & Kuo-Lung Yang, 2019. "The Convergence of Gallego’s Iterative Method for Distribution-Free Inventory Models," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-10, May.
    11. Rong Li & Jing‐Sheng Jeannette Song & Shuxiao Sun & Xiaona Zheng, 2022. "Fight inventory shrinkage: Simultaneous learning of inventory level and shrinkage rate," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2477-2491, June.
    12. Song, Shuang & Govindan, Kannan & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Qiao, Xiaojiao, 2017. "Capacity and production planning with carbon emission constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 132-150.
    13. Lorenzo Cerboni Baiardi & Ahmad K. Naimzada, 2018. "An evolutionary model with best response and imitative rules," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 41(2), pages 313-333, November.
    14. Fan, Di & Liang, Tianheng & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Zhang, Haomin, 2020. "The impact of capacity-reduction initiatives on the stock market value of Chinese manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    15. Li, Xiaonan & Li, Xiangyong & Shi, Junxin, 2024. "Capacity sharing for ride-sourcing platforms under competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Morimura, Fumikazu & Sakagawa, Yuji, 2018. "Information technology use in retail chains: Impact on the standardisation of pricing and promotion strategies and performance," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 81-91.
    17. Li, Li & Jiang, Li, 2022. "Saving costs and improving selling through competitor cooperation in sourcing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 302(3), pages 970-982.
    18. Sameh S Askar & Abdulrahman Al-Khedhairi, 2020. "Local and Global Dynamics of a Constraint Profit Maximization for Bischi–Naimzada Competition Duopoly Game," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Tomasz Dubiel-Teleszyński, 2010. "Complex Dynamics in a Bertrand Duopoly Game with Heterogeneous Players," Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, Central European Journal of Economic Modelling and Econometrics, vol. 2(2), pages 95-116, March.
    20. Naimzada, A.K. & Raimondo, Roberto, 2018. "Heterogeneity and chaos in congestion games," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 335(C), pages 278-291.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:16:p:5790-:d:397062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.