IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i14p5236-d387110.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Attitudes of the Public to Receiving Medical Care during Emergencies through Remote Physician–Patient Communications

Author

Listed:
  • Matilda Hamlin

    (Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine Department., School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel Aviv, Israel
    Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Steinn Steingrimsson

    (Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden)

  • Itzhak Cohen

    (Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine Department., School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel Aviv, Israel)

  • Victor Bero

    (Meuhedet Health Services, Eben Gabirol 124, 62038 Tel Aviv, Israel)

  • Avishay Bar-Tl

    (Meuhedet Health Services, Eben Gabirol 124, 62038 Tel Aviv, Israel)

  • Bruria Adini

    (Emergency Management & Disaster Medicine Department., School of Public Health, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 39040 Tel Aviv, Israel)

Abstract

Providing health services through remote communications for sub-acute health issues during emergencies may help reduce the burden of the health care system and increase availability of care. This study aimed to investigate the attitudes of the public towards receiving medical services and providing medical information through remote communication in times of emergencies. During the pandemic outbreak of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19), pandemic outbreak, 507 participants answered a structured online survey, rating their mean willingness to receive medical care and provide medical information, on a four-point Likert scale. Furthermore, demographic characteristics, social media use, and trust in data protection was collected. The mean willingness to receive medical services was 3.1 ± 0.6 and the mean willingness to provide medical information was 3.0 ± 0.7, with a strong significant correlation between the two ( r = 0.76). The multiple regression model identified higher trust in data protection, level of education, and social media use as statistically significant predictors for a higher willingness to receive medical information while the first two predicted willingness to provide information. The findings suggest an overall positive attitude to receive medical care through remote communications.

Suggested Citation

  • Matilda Hamlin & Steinn Steingrimsson & Itzhak Cohen & Victor Bero & Avishay Bar-Tl & Bruria Adini, 2020. "Attitudes of the Public to Receiving Medical Care during Emergencies through Remote Physician–Patient Communications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5236-:d:387110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5236/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/14/5236/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenni Konttila & Heidi Siira & Helvi Kyngäs & Minna Lahtinen & Satu Elo & Maria Kääriäinen & Pirjo Kaakinen & Anne Oikarinen & Miyae Yamakawa & Sakiko Fukui & Momoe Utsumi & Yoko Higami & Akari Higuch, 2019. "Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 745-761, March.
    2. John F. Emerson & Madelyn Welch & Whitney E. Rossman & Stephen Carek & Thomas Ludden & Megan Templin & Charity G. Moore & Hazel Tapp & Michael Dulin & Andrew McWilliams, 2015. "A Multidisciplinary Intervention Utilizing Virtual Communication Tools to Reduce Health Disparities: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Neil M. Ferguson & Derek A.T. Cummings & Simon Cauchemez & Christophe Fraser & Steven Riley & Aronrag Meeyai & Sopon Iamsirithaworn & Donald S. Burke, 2005. "Strategies for containing an emerging influenza pandemic in Southeast Asia," Nature, Nature, vol. 437(7056), pages 209-214, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tamer Edirne & Dilek Avci & Burçak Dagkara & Muslum Aslan, 2011. "Knowledge and anticipated attitudes of the community about bird flu outbreak in Turkey, 2007–2008: a survey-based descriptive study," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 56(2), pages 163-168, April.
    2. Wei Zhong, 2017. "Simulating influenza pandemic dynamics with public risk communication and individual responsive behavior," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 475-495, December.
    3. Linus Nyiwul, 2021. "Epidemic Control and Resource Allocation: Approaches and Implications for the Management of COVID-19," Studies in Microeconomics, , vol. 9(2), pages 283-305, December.
    4. Zhongqiang Bai & Juanle Wang & Mingming Wang & Mengxu Gao & Jiulin Sun, 2018. "Accuracy Assessment of Multi-Source Gridded Population Distribution Datasets in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Andrew J Black & Joshua V Ross, 2013. "Estimating a Markovian Epidemic Model Using Household Serial Interval Data from the Early Phase of an Epidemic," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(8), pages 1-8, August.
    6. Li, Qian & Xiao, Yanni, 2023. "Analysis of a hybrid SIR model combining the fixed-moments pulse interventions with susceptibles-triggered threshold policy," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 453(C).
    7. Nguyen, Le Khanh Ngan & Howick, Susan & Megiddo, Itamar, 2024. "A framework for conceptualising hybrid system dynamics and agent-based simulation models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 315(3), pages 1153-1166.
    8. Edoardo Di Porto & Paolo Naticchioni & Vincenzo Scrutinio, 2020. "Partial Lockdown and the Spread of Covid-19: Lessons from the Italian Case," CSEF Working Papers 569, Centre for Studies in Economics and Finance (CSEF), University of Naples, Italy.
    9. Khan, Mohsin & Abdalgader, Tarteel & Pedersen, Michael & Zhang, Lai, 2025. "Interactive effects of climate change and human mobility on dengue transmission," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    10. Eva K. Lee & Ferdinand Pietz & Bernard Benecke & Jacquelyn Mason & Greg Burel, 2013. "Advancing Public Health and Medical Preparedness with Operations Research," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(1), pages 79-98, February.
    11. Sabina Alistar & Elisa Long & Margaret Brandeau & Eduard Beck, 2014. "HIV epidemic control—a model for optimal allocation of prevention and treatment resources," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 162-181, June.
    12. Huberts, Nick F.D. & Thijssen, Jacco J.J., 2023. "Optimal timing of non-pharmaceutical interventions during an epidemic," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 305(3), pages 1366-1389.
    13. Bekiros, Stelios & Kouloumpou, Dimitra, 2020. "SBDiEM: A new mathematical model of infectious disease dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    14. Akira Watanabe & Hiroyuki Matsuda, 2023. "Effectiveness of feedback control and the trade-off between death by COVID-19 and costs of countermeasures," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 46-61, March.
    15. Andy Hong & Sandip Chakrabarti, 2023. "Compact living or policy inaction? Effects of urban density and lockdown on the COVID-19 outbreak in the US," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 60(9), pages 1588-1609, July.
    16. Piia Silvennoinen, 2020. "Professional Master’s Degree Students’ Perceptions on the Changes Digitalisation Imposes on Counselling in the Social and Health Care Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-10, August.
    17. Lawrence M. Wein & Michael P. Atkinson, 2009. "Assessing Infection Control Measures for Pandemic Influenza," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(7), pages 949-962, July.
    18. Savachkin, Alex & Uribe, Andrés, 2012. "Dynamic redistribution of mitigation resources during influenza pandemics," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 33-45.
    19. Guihua Wang, 2022. "Stay at home to stay safe: Effectiveness of stay‐at‐home orders in containing the COVID‐19 pandemic," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(5), pages 2289-2305, May.
    20. Lord Ferguson, Sarah & Smith, Claudia & Kietzmann, Jan, 2022. "Hands-off? Lessons from high-touch professionals about going virtual," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 303-313.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:14:p:5236-:d:387110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.