IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i17p6243-d405104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Professional Master’s Degree Students’ Perceptions on the Changes Digitalisation Imposes on Counselling in the Social and Health Care Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Piia Silvennoinen

    (Unit of Digital Education and Master Programmes, Laurea University of Applied Sciences, 02650 Espoo, Finland)

Abstract

The study portrays the social and health care master’s students’ ( N = 19) perceptions on the changes in work practices due to digitalisation, with a special focus on online counselling. Furthermore, the data include thoughts on the impact digitalised interaction, i.e., online counselling, has on their work and professional identities. The students studied how the motivational interviewing method combined with a solution-focused counselling approach is applicable in online settings by using simulation pedagogy. The data consisted of students’ learning diaries. Furthermore, the data were analysed using inductive content analysis. The results show that the digitalisation of work practices demands blended professionalism, which allows the professional to work both face-to-face and online with clients. In addition, the education of social and health care professionals needs to address the lack of competences and skills in digitalised work practices and provide a conceptual and practical understanding of blended professionalism in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Piia Silvennoinen, 2020. "Professional Master’s Degree Students’ Perceptions on the Changes Digitalisation Imposes on Counselling in the Social and Health Care Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-10, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6243-:d:405104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6243/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/17/6243/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenni Konttila & Heidi Siira & Helvi Kyngäs & Minna Lahtinen & Satu Elo & Maria Kääriäinen & Pirjo Kaakinen & Anne Oikarinen & Miyae Yamakawa & Sakiko Fukui & Momoe Utsumi & Yoko Higami & Akari Higuch, 2019. "Healthcare professionals’ competence in digitalisation: A systematic review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5-6), pages 745-761, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Majcherek, Dawid & Hegerty, Scott William & Kowalski, Arkadiusz Michał & Lewandowska, Małgorzata Stefania & Dikova, Desislava, 2024. "Opportunities for healthcare digitalization in Europe: Comparative analysis of inequalities in access to medical services," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    2. Lord Ferguson, Sarah & Smith, Claudia & Kietzmann, Jan, 2022. "Hands-off? Lessons from high-touch professionals about going virtual," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 65(3), pages 303-313.
    3. Matilda Hamlin & Steinn Steingrimsson & Itzhak Cohen & Victor Bero & Avishay Bar-Tl & Bruria Adini, 2020. "Attitudes of the Public to Receiving Medical Care during Emergencies through Remote Physician–Patient Communications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-12, July.
    4. Simona Andreea Apostu & Valentina Vasile & Cristina Veres, 2021. "Externalities of Lean Implementation in Medical Laboratories. Process Optimization vs. Adaptation and Flexibility for the Future," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(23), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Rebecca M. Jedwab & Alison M. Hutchinson & Elizabeth Manias & Rafael A. Calvo & Naomi Dobroff & Nicholas Glozier & Bernice Redley, 2021. "Nurse Motivation, Engagement and Well-Being before an Electronic Medical Record System Implementation: A Mixed Methods Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Gong, Yaping & Khan, Muhammad Aamir & TAM, Kar Yan, 2024. "Assessing Competencies of Fintech Employees: Development and Validation of a Competency Model and Assessment Scale," OSF Preprints g9e7j, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:17:p:6243-:d:405104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.