IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4804-d380071.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process Evaluation of a School-Based Program Aimed at Preventing Obesity in Adolescents from Lima and Callao, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Rosemary Cosme Chavez

    (Yonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea
    Department of Health Administration, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

  • Eun Woo Nam

    (Yonsei Global Health Center, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea
    Department of Health Administration, Graduate School, Yonsei University, Wonju 26493, Korea)

Abstract

The study aims to describe process evaluation measures of the three-year Health Promoting Schools’ obesity prevention program in Lima and Callao, Peru, and to assess factors that influenced the implementation of the intervention leading to the mentioned process outcomes results. The program was implemented in four public high schools located in low-income areas of Lima and Callao. Embedded in a Health Promoting School Intervention, the program consisted of two main components—an education program and several environmental activities. Quantitative data were collected and analyzed based on dose delivered and reach for each specific activity. Dose received was analyzed by satisfaction scores related to six specific activities. Furthermore, qualitative data including documentation of activities and transcriptions from individual in-depth interviews were qualitatively analyzed to identify factors influencing the implementation. The education component of the Health Promoting Schools’ program achieved a 78.4% average nutrition sessions delivery in 2015 and 88.0% in 2017; while for PA sessions, the average delivery in 2015 was of 79.7% and 93.8% in 2017. In the case of reach, at least 75% of total students participated in all sessions per year. Nevertheless, there were differences in terms of delivery and participation in a number of environmental activities within and between schools during the program period. Differences in delivery included education sessions for parents, teachers, Junior Health Promoters, and school food kiosk staff, besides execution of physical activity events every year. Impeding factors included the complexity of the overall intervention, limited strategies to facilitate program implementation and those to maintain the participation of subjects, and related contextual factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Rosemary Cosme Chavez & Eun Woo Nam, 2020. "Process Evaluation of a School-Based Program Aimed at Preventing Obesity in Adolescents from Lima and Callao, Peru," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4804-:d:380071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4804/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4804/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robbins, Lorraine B. & Pfeiffer, Karin Allor & Wesolek, Stacey M. & Lo, Yun-Jia, 2014. "Process evaluation for a school-based physical activity intervention for 6th- and 7th-grade boys: Reach, dose, and fidelity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 21-31.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacqueline Bonnema & Dané Coetzee & Anita Lennox, 2022. "Effect of a Three-Month HOPSports Brain Breaks ® Intervention Program on the Physical Fitness Levels of Grade 6-Learners in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Alia, Kassandra A. & Wilson, Dawn K. & McDaniel, Tyler & St. George, Sara M. & Kitzman-Ulrich, Heather & Smith, Kelsey & Heatley, VaShawn & Wise, Courtney, 2015. "Development of an innovative process evaluation approach for the Families Improving Together (FIT) for weight loss trial in African American adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 106-116.
    3. Yao Zhang & Yi Yin & Jianxiu Liu & Ming Yang & Zeshi Liu & Xindong Ma, 2020. "Impact of Combined Theory-Based Intervention on Psychological Effects and Physical Activity among Chinese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Iachini, Aidyn L. & Beets, Michael W. & Ball, Annahita & Lohman, Mary, 2014. "Process evaluation of “Girls on the Run”: Exploring implementation in a physical activity-based positive youth development program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4804-:d:380071. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.