IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/epplan/v42y2014icp21-31.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Process evaluation for a school-based physical activity intervention for 6th- and 7th-grade boys: Reach, dose, and fidelity

Author

Listed:
  • Robbins, Lorraine B.
  • Pfeiffer, Karin Allor
  • Wesolek, Stacey M.
  • Lo, Yun-Jia

Abstract

The purpose was to evaluate the reach, dose, and fidelity of Guys Only Activity for Life (G.O.A.L.), a 7-week pilot intervention conducted from February to March 2011 to increase 6th and 7th grade boys’ moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA). One middle school was randomly assigned to the G.O.A.L. intervention and another from the same urban school district in the Midwestern U.S. to a comparison condition. Thirty boys, ages 10–14 years, participated in each school. The intervention, guided by the Health Promotion Model (HPM) and Self-Determination Theory (SDT), consisted of a 90-min after-school physical activity club 4 days/week and one motivational interviewing session with a registered (school) nurse. Data were gathered via attendance records, club observations, heart rate monitors, audio-taping of motivational interviewing sessions, and surveys. On average boys attended the club 2.11 days/week (SD=.86). A trained independent process evaluator reported that the physical activity club instructors provided the boys with the opportunity for a mean of 25.8min/day of MVPA. Using a four-point Likert scale (1=disagree a lot; 4=agree a lot), the process evaluator perceived that the club was delivered with high fidelity and adherence to the underlying theories (M=3.48; SD=0.39). Sessions with the nurse lasted an average of 13min, 29s. All boys attended. Two trained independent coders indicated that the nurse demonstrated at least beginning proficiency for all tasks associated with motivational interviewing, with the exception of using sufficient open- as opposed to closed-ended questions and reflections compared to questions. Fidelity related to session delivery and adherence to the theories was high (M=3.83; SD=0.19). The process evaluation data indicated that strategies are needed to increase attendance and boys’ MVPA during the club time.

Suggested Citation

  • Robbins, Lorraine B. & Pfeiffer, Karin Allor & Wesolek, Stacey M. & Lo, Yun-Jia, 2014. "Process evaluation for a school-based physical activity intervention for 6th- and 7th-grade boys: Reach, dose, and fidelity," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 21-31.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:42:y:2014:i:c:p:21-31
    DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149718913000815
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2013.09.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wilson, Dawn K. & Griffin, Sarah & Saunders, Ruth P. & Evans, Alexandra & Mixon, Gary & Wright, Marcie & Beasley, Amelia & Umstattd, M. Renee & Lattimore, Diana & Watts, Ashley & Freelove, Julie, 2006. "Formative evaluation of a motivational intervention for increasing physical activity in underserved youth," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 260-268, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alia, Kassandra A. & Wilson, Dawn K. & McDaniel, Tyler & St. George, Sara M. & Kitzman-Ulrich, Heather & Smith, Kelsey & Heatley, VaShawn & Wise, Courtney, 2015. "Development of an innovative process evaluation approach for the Families Improving Together (FIT) for weight loss trial in African American adolescents," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 106-116.
    2. Jacqueline Bonnema & Dané Coetzee & Anita Lennox, 2022. "Effect of a Three-Month HOPSports Brain Breaks ® Intervention Program on the Physical Fitness Levels of Grade 6-Learners in South Africa," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-15, September.
    3. Rosemary Cosme Chavez & Eun Woo Nam, 2020. "Process Evaluation of a School-Based Program Aimed at Preventing Obesity in Adolescents from Lima and Callao, Peru," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    4. Yao Zhang & Yi Yin & Jianxiu Liu & Ming Yang & Zeshi Liu & Xindong Ma, 2020. "Impact of Combined Theory-Based Intervention on Psychological Effects and Physical Activity among Chinese Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, April.
    5. Iachini, Aidyn L. & Beets, Michael W. & Ball, Annahita & Lohman, Mary, 2014. "Process evaluation of “Girls on the Run”: Exploring implementation in a physical activity-based positive youth development program," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 1-9.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:epplan:v:42:y:2014:i:c:p:21-31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/evalprogplan .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.