IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i13p4764-d379463.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Design of and Preference for Collection Modes of Reusable Takeaway Containers to Promote Sustainable Consumption

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaohong Jiang

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Mingyu Dong

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Yuewei He

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jiayi Shen

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wenqi Jing

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Nan Yang

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Longpan Road 159#, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Xiucheng Guo

    (School of Transportation, Southeast University, Si Pai Lou 2#, Nanjing 210096, China)

Abstract

The development of the online to offline business has accelerated the growth of the online food ordering market in China. The widespread use of disposable takeaway containers has resulted in a large amount of waste, which seriously affects the ecological environment. This paper studied the collection modes of reusable takeaway containers and the preferences of consumers and merchants. First, after two rounds of discussion and revision, four takeaway container collection modes were designed. Second, based on the survey results of consumers and merchants, a binary logistic regression model was applied to analyze the preferences of consumers and merchants. The results showed that the consumers’ delivery requirements and the current disposal of takeaway containers had a significant impact on consumers’ preferences. Consumers were more concerned about the hygienic status of the containers, food health and safety, while the merchants were more concerned about the increased costs. The promotion of collection modes requires the special consideration of the locations of dishwashing facilities and increased costs. Finally, according to the preferences and concerns of consumers and merchants, several suggestions on promoting the collection mode, such as the use of different promotion strategies for different people, the short distance of dishwashing facilities, reward systems, and food safeguard measures were proposed. This research provides guidance for decision making regarding the sustainable consumption and the promotion of reusable takeaway containers, which will contribute to resource conservation, ecological environmental improvement and sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaohong Jiang & Mingyu Dong & Yuewei He & Jiayi Shen & Wenqi Jing & Nan Yang & Xiucheng Guo, 2020. "Research on the Design of and Preference for Collection Modes of Reusable Takeaway Containers to Promote Sustainable Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4764-:d:379463
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4764/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/13/4764/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greger Henriksson & Lynn Åkesson & Susanne Ewert, 2010. "Uncertainty Regarding Waste Handling in Everyday Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(9), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Aarnio, Teija & Hämäläinen, Anne, 2008. "Challenges in packaging waste management in the fast food industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 612-621.
    3. Xingchen Yan & Tao Wang & Jun Chen & Xiaofei Ye & Zhen Yang & Hua Bai, 2019. "Analysis of the Characteristics and Number of Bicycle–Passenger Conflicts at Bus Stops for Improving Safety," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Meghann Matthews & Thomas L. Webb, 2023. "Understanding Consumer’s Willingness to Engage with Digital Reuse Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-26, October.
    2. Klara Theobald & Anne Mich & Stefanie Hillesheim & Susanne Hartard & Holger Rohn, 2024. "One Year of Mandatory Reusable Packaging in Germany: Opportunities and Obstacles from the Perspective of Consumers and Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-14, June.
    3. Hu Sun & Qihang Yang & Yueqin Wu, 2023. "Evaluation and Design of Reusable Takeaway Containers Based on the AHP–FCE Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2023. "Design-Based Approach to Support Sorting Behavior of Food Packaging," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-32, February.
    2. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    3. Helén Williams & Fredrik Wikström & Katarina Wetter-Edman & Per Kristensson, 2018. "Decisions on Recycling or Waste: How Packaging Functions Affect the Fate of Used Packaging in Selected Swedish Households," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Kamran Rousta & Karin M. Ekström, 2013. "Assessing Incorrect Household Waste Sorting in a Medium-Sized Swedish City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(10), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2020. "The Potential of Food Packaging Attributes to Influence Consumers’ Decisions to Sort Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Yongqiang Zhang & Zhuang Hu & Min Zhang & Wenting Ba & Ying Wang, 2022. "Emergency Response Resource Allocation in Sparse Network Using Improved Particle Swarm Optimization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-11, August.
    7. Göran Finnveden & Tomas Ekvall & Yevgeniya Arushanyan & Mattias Bisaillon & Greger Henriksson & Ulrika Gunnarsson Östling & Maria Ljunggren Söderman & Jenny Sahlin & Åsa Stenmarck & Johan Sundberg & J, 2013. "Policy Instruments towards a Sustainable Waste Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-41, February.
    8. Alwaeli, Mohamed, 2010. "The impact of product charges and EU directives on the level of packaging waste recycling in Poland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 609-614.
    9. Xiaofei Ye & Yi Zhu & Tao Wang & Xingchen Yan & Jun Chen & Bin Ran, 2022. "Level of Service Model of the Non-Motorized Vehicle Crossing the Signalized Intersection Based on Riders’ Perception Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    10. Babak Nemat & Mohammad Razzaghi & Kim Bolton & Kamran Rousta, 2019. "The Role of Food Packaging Design in Consumer Recycling Behavior—A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    11. Jui-Che Tu & Ting-Yun Lo & Yi-Jing Sie & Tsai-Feng Kao, 2021. "Key Factors for Involvement Degree and Perceived Value in Consumers’ Purchase Intention in Unpacked Stores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Antonella Senese & Massimo Pecci & Roberto Ambrosini & Guglielmina Adele Diolaiuti, 2023. "MOUNTAINPLAST: A New Italian Plastic Footprint with a Focus on Mountain Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    13. Erhan Ada & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı & Banu Y. Ekren & Cansu Çimitay Çelik, 2023. "Identifying the Drivers of Circular Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review for the Current State of the Food Supply Chain to Be Sustainable and Circular," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    14. Chen, Chung-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Tui, 2013. "Energy recovery or material recovery for MSW treatments?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 37-44.
    15. García-Granero, Eva M. & Piedra-Muñoz, Laura & Galdeano-Gómez, Emilio, 2018. "Eco-innovation measurement: A review of firm performance indicators," MPRA Paper 119905, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    16. Ahmed Jaber & János Juhász & Bálint Csonka, 2021. "An Analysis of Factors Affecting the Severity of Cycling Crashes Using Binary Regression Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, June.
    17. Han, Gül S. Akçay & Bektaş, Nihal & Öncel, M. Salim, 2010. "Separate collection practice of packaging waste as an example of Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1317-1321.
    18. Christian Bux & Alina Cerasela Aluculesei & Simona Moagăr-Poladian, 2022. "How to Monitor the Transition to Sustainable Food Services and Lodging Accommodation Activities: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    19. Qi Zhang & Hongyang Li & Xin Wan & Martin Skitmore & Hailin Sun, 2020. "An Intelligent Waste Removal System for Smarter Communities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-27, August.
    20. Tobias D. Nielsen & Jacob Hasselbalch & Karl Holmberg & Johannes Stripple, 2020. "Politics and the plastic crisis: A review throughout the plastic life cycle," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(1), January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:13:p:4764-:d:379463. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.