IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p7017-d1129672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

MOUNTAINPLAST: A New Italian Plastic Footprint with a Focus on Mountain Activities

Author

Listed:
  • Antonella Senese

    (Dipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Massimo Pecci

    (Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri, Dipartimento per gli Affari Regionali e le Autonomie (DARA), Via della Stamperia, 8, 00187 Roma, Italy)

  • Roberto Ambrosini

    (Dipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy)

  • Guglielmina Adele Diolaiuti

    (Dipartimento di Scienze e Politiche Ambientali, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Celoria 2, 20133 Milan, Italy)

Abstract

The plastic footprint is defined as a science-based tool for quantifying the amount of plastic (in kg) one contributes to the world’s plastic waste (from plastic wraps to anything containing plastics, such as clothes). Making consumers aware of their total plastic footprint and of how it is divided among their various daily life activities can promote concrete eco-sustainable actions aimed at reducing it and consequently plastic consumption. To this aim, we developed a free online plastic footprint calculator for making users aware of how much plastic they introduce into the environment through individual consumption, from food to clothing or leisure. In this tool, we also considered the consumption of plastics during mountain activities as it leads to the production of specific plastic waste. We tested the beta version of this tool on a small sample of users, including students, living in the mountains. Our results show that the sector with the greatest impact is food consumption (72.8%, mainly due to plastic drink bottles), followed by mountain activities (17.4%), a sector that was investigated in more detail (i.e., with more questions) than food consumption. Considering only mountain activities, synthetic fleeces are the most widely used and incorrectly managed items (34.7%), followed by shoes for mountain running or hiking (20.8%). We hope this tool will contribute to more aware use and management of plastic items during mountain activities and daily life and help reduce the distribution of plastics into the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonella Senese & Massimo Pecci & Roberto Ambrosini & Guglielmina Adele Diolaiuti, 2023. "MOUNTAINPLAST: A New Italian Plastic Footprint with a Focus on Mountain Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7017-:d:1129672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7017/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/7017/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aarnio, Teija & Hämäläinen, Anne, 2008. "Challenges in packaging waste management in the fast food industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 612-621.
    2. Susie Ruqun Wu & Changliang Shao & Jiquan Chen, 2018. "Approaches on the Screening Methods for Materiality in Sustainability Reporting," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonella Senese & Anna Claudia Caspani & Lorenzo Lombardo & Veronica Manara & Guglielmina Adele Diolaiuti & Maurizio Maugeri, 2024. "A User-Friendly Tool to Increase Awareness about Impacts of Human Daily Life Activities on Carbon Footprint," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohammed Ali Sharafuddin & Meena Madhavan & Thanapong Chaichana, 2022. "The Effects of Innovation Adoption and Social Factors between Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices and Sustainable Firm Performance: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-30, July.
    2. Jonathan Morris & Edeltraud Guenther, 2024. "Can the Sustainable Development Goals support nexus thinking in companies? The case of water," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 679-691, February.
    3. Inten Meutia & Shelly F. Kartasari & Zulnaidi Yaacob, 2022. "Stakeholder or Legitimacy Theory? The Rationale behind a Company’s Materiality Analysis: Evidence from Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Xiaohong Jiang & Mingyu Dong & Yuewei He & Jiayi Shen & Wenqi Jing & Nan Yang & Xiucheng Guo, 2020. "Research on the Design of and Preference for Collection Modes of Reusable Takeaway Containers to Promote Sustainable Consumption," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Alwaeli, Mohamed, 2010. "The impact of product charges and EU directives on the level of packaging waste recycling in Poland," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(10), pages 609-614.
    6. Miseldra Gil-Marín & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Sandra Vera-Ruiz & Analia Verónica Losada, 2022. "Sustainability Accounting Studies: A Metasynthesis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Wilmer Rivas-Asanza & Jennifer Celleri-Pacheco & Javier Andrade-Garda & Rafael García-Vázquez & Virginia Mato-Abad & Santiago Rodríguez-Yáñez & Sonia Suárez-Garaboa, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability in Information Technologies Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Yining Zhou & Geoff Lamberton & Michael B. Charles, 2023. "An Explanatory Model of Materiality in Sustainability Accounting: Integrating Accountability and Stakeholder Heterogeneity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    9. Fleming, Aysha & O'Grady, Anthony P. & Stitzlein, Cara & Ogilvy, Sue & Mendham, Daniel & Harrison, Matthew T., 2022. "Improving acceptance of natural capital accounting in land use decision making: Barriers and opportunities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    10. Erhan Ada & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı & Banu Y. Ekren & Cansu Çimitay Çelik, 2023. "Identifying the Drivers of Circular Food Packaging: A Comprehensive Review for the Current State of the Food Supply Chain to Be Sustainable and Circular," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Chen, Chung-Chiang & Chen, Yi-Tui, 2013. "Energy recovery or material recovery for MSW treatments?," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 37-44.
    12. Han, Gül S. Akçay & Bektaş, Nihal & Öncel, M. Salim, 2010. "Separate collection practice of packaging waste as an example of Küçükçekmece, Istanbul, Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1317-1321.
    13. Christian Bux & Alina Cerasela Aluculesei & Simona Moagăr-Poladian, 2022. "How to Monitor the Transition to Sustainable Food Services and Lodging Accommodation Activities: A Bibliometric Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, July.
    14. Lavinia Conca & Francesco Manta & Domenico Morrone & Pierluigi Toma, 2021. "The impact of direct environmental, social, and governance reporting: Empirical evidence in European‐listed companies in the agri‐food sector," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1080-1093, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:7017-:d:1129672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.