IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i12p4515-d375367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business Results and Well-Being: An Engaging Leadership Intervention Study

Author

Listed:
  • Lars van Tuin

    (Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands)

  • Wilmar B. Schaufeli

    (Social, Health and Organizational Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
    Research Unit Work Occupational & Organizational Psychology and Professional Learning, KU Leuven, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium)

  • Willem van Rhenen

    (Engagement & Productivity, Nyenrode Business Universiteit, 3621 BG Breukelen, The Netherlands)

  • Rebecca M. Kuiper

    (Department of Methodology and Statistics, Utrecht University, 3584 CH Utrecht, The Netherlands)

Abstract

The present quasi-experimental study tested the business impact of a leadership development program focusing on psychological well-being through the satisfaction of basic psychological needs. Based on the concept of engaging leadership and self-determination theory, the 8-month program targeted midlevel team leaders of the customer fulfilment center of a health systems multinational organization. The program was designed in co-creation between senior leadership and the team leaders that participated in the program. Outcomes showed positive business results through significant increases in a preselected key performance indicator and decreased employee absenteeism. Through changes in autonomy satisfaction and intrinsic motivation, the team leaders ( N = 14) benefitted in a moderate to very large extent relative to a similar control group ( N = 52). In contrast, team members ( N = 148) displayed no such benefits. Specifically, higher levels of autonomy satisfaction are said to lead to higher levels of psychological well-being and motivation. Still, the link with business performance is absent in most organizational studies within self-determination theory, making the present study one of the first to fill this gap. The study discloses the program design, compares the effects to a relevant control group, evaluates the lessons learned, and provides practical suggestions.

Suggested Citation

  • Lars van Tuin & Wilmar B. Schaufeli & Willem van Rhenen & Rebecca M. Kuiper, 2020. "Business Results and Well-Being: An Engaging Leadership Intervention Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-18, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4515-:d:375367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4515/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/12/4515/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Estampe, Dominique & Lamouri, Samir & Paris, Jean-Luc & Brahim-Djelloul, Sakina, 2013. "A framework for analysing supply chain performance evaluation models," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(2), pages 247-258.
    2. Guoquan Chen & Dean Tjosvold & Chunhong Liu, 2006. "Cooperative Goals, Leader People and Productivity Values: Their Contribution to Top Management Teams in China," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(5), pages 1177-1200, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suhong Li & Thomas Ngniatedema & Fang Chen, 2017. "Understanding the Impact of Green Initiatives and Green Performance on Financial Performance in the US," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(6), pages 776-790, September.
    2. Hassan Mehrmanesh & Seyed Rahim Safavi Mirmahalleh, 2017. "Examining the Relationship between Supply Chain Relationships and Practice of Distributors (Case Study: NoshinCo)," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 7(2), pages 67-70.
    3. Bo Yan & Zhuo Chen & Hongyuan Li, 2019. "Evaluation of agri-product supply chain competitiveness based on extension theory," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 543-570, June.
    4. Daniela Petrikova & Tatiana Sorokova, 2016. "Managerial And Entrepreneurial Skills As Determinants Of Business," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 14(1), pages 184-194, December.
    5. Christopher Kurzhals & Lorenz Graf‐Vlachy & Andreas König, 2020. "Strategic leadership and technological innovation: A comprehensive review and research agenda," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 437-464, November.
    6. Yueqiao Qiao & Zhe Zhang & Ming Jia, 2021. "Their Pain, Our Pleasure: How and When Peer Abusive Supervision Leads to Third Parties’ Schadenfreude and Work Engagement," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 695-711, April.
    7. Dean Tjosvold & Nancy Yifeng Chen & Xu Huang & Da Xu, 2014. "Developing Cooperative Teams to Support Individual Performance and Well-Being in a Call Center in China," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 325-348, March.
    8. Mian Muhammad Atif & Sajjad Nazir & Syed Muhammad Abdullah, 2017. "Antecedents of Organizational Performance in Challenging Business Environment: The role of Employee Commitment and Supply Chain Integration," Business & Economic Review, Institute of Management Sciences, Peshawar, Pakistan, vol. 9(4), pages 65-82, December.
    9. Blanka Tundys & Tomasz Wiśniewski, 2018. "The Selected Method and Tools for Performance Measurement in the Green Supply Chain—Survey Analysis in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-26, February.
    10. Manel Elmsalmi & Wafik Hachicha & Awad M. Aljuaid, 2021. "Prioritization of the Best Sustainable Supply Chain Risk Management Practices Using a Structural Analysis Based-Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Lau, Chung-Ming, 2011. "Team and organizational resources, strategic orientations, and firm performance in a transitional economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 64(12), pages 1344-1351.
    12. Adivar, Burcu & Hüseyinoğlu, Işık Özge Yumurtacı & Christopher, Martin, 2019. "A quantitative performance management framework for assessing omnichannel retail supply chains," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 257-269.
    13. Seiler, A. & Papanagnou, C. & Scarf, P., 2020. "On the relationship between financial performance and position of businesses in supply chain networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2019. "Predicting supply chain performance based on SCOR® metrics and multilayer perceptron neural networks," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 19-38.
    15. Brint, Andrew & Genovese, Andrea & Piccolo, Carmela & Taboada-Perez, Gerardo J., 2021. "Reducing data requirements when selecting key performance indicators for supply chain management: The case of a multinational automotive component manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    16. Chahal, Hardeep & Gupta, Mahesh & Bhan, Namrita & Cheng, T.C.E., 2020. "Operations management research grounded in the resource-based view: A meta-analysis," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    17. Widarti Widarti & Desfitrina Desfitrina & Zulfadhli Zulfadhli, 2020. "Business Process Life Cycle Affects Company Financial Performance: Micro, Small, and Medium Business Enterprises During The Covid-19 Period," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 10(5), pages 211-219.
    18. Ayça Yüksel Sakınç & Ercan Ergün, 2024. "Leadership Behaviors and Leader Effectiveness: The Mediating Role of Cultural Intelligence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
    19. Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Ho, William, 2015. "Strategic supplier performance evaluation: A case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 192-214.
    20. Sze‐Sze Wong & Wai Fong Boh & Anne Wu, 2021. "When Three’s (Good) Company: Third‐Party Friendships on Cooperation across Departments," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(2), pages 389-420, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:12:p:4515-:d:375367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.