IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3874-d364977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Well-Being and Anxiety among University Students

Author

Listed:
  • Luis Felipe Dias Lopes

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Bianca Michels Chaves

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Adriane Fabrício

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Adriana Porto

    (Department of Business Administration, University Luterana of Braszil—ULBRA, Cachoeira do Sul—Rua Martinho Lutero 301, Bairro Universitário, Cachoeira do Sul, Rio Grande do Sul 96.501-595, Brazil)

  • Damiana Machado de Almeida

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Sandra Leonara Obregon

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Mauren Pimentel Lima

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Wesley Vieira da Silva

    (Department of Management, Federal Rural University of Semi-Arid—UFERSA, Rua Francisco Mota, 572, Presidente Costa e Silva, Mossoró, RN 59625-900, Brazil)

  • Maria Emilia Camargo

    (Graduate Program in Industrial Engineering, University of Caxias do Sul, Rua Francisco Getúlio Vargas 1130, Caxias do Sul 95070-560, Brazil)

  • Claudimar Pereira da Veiga

    (School of Management—PPGOLD, Federal University of Parana—UFPR, 632 Prefeito Lothário Meissner Ave, Jardim Botânico, Curitiba, Paraná 80210-170, Brazil)

  • Gilnei Luiz de Moura

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

  • Luciana Santos Costa Vieira da Silva

    (Department of Management, Municipal Center of São José, Rua Jaír Viêira, 2–68, Kobrasol, São José, Santa Catarina 88102-180, Brazil)

  • Vânia Medianeira Flores Costa

    (Graduate Program in Business Administration—PPGA, Federal University of Santa Maria—UFSM, Av. Roraima n° 1000, Cidade Universitária, Camobi, Santa Maria, Rio Grande do Sul estado 97105-900, Brazil)

Abstract

This article aims to interrelate dimensions of the well-being validation instruments proposed by Watson, Clark and Tellegen (PANAS) with generalized anxiety dimensions proposed by Spitzer et al. (GAD-7) and state-trait anxiety inventories proposed by Biaggio and Natalício (IDATE), using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), in the case of individual university students in southern Brazil and the city of Buenos Aires, Argentina. We conducted a behavioral study, characterized as exploratory-descriptive, by applying a questionnaire survey to collect data though face-to face interviews to a group of 460 university students from June to August 2019. A non-probabilistic sampling method for convenience was used, justified by the heterogeneous incidence of the participants. Our results support most of the proposed hypotheses. Only one hypothesis was rejected, i.e., that the Positive Affection Scale (WBS) is not related to the State Anxiety Inventory (IAE)—when a person is feeling in full activity, this situation does not affect the momentary state, characterized by tension, apprehension and by increased activity in the autonomic nervous system. In terms of the subjective well-being of students, 14.13% were found to have a low rating. 86.74% were found to have generalized anxiety; 75% had trait anxiety, and 80.22% had state anxiety. Our results indicate the need for preventive measures to minimize anxiety and help maintain necessary levels of well-being during this phase of academic development and when forging a professional career. It is expected that new studies will contribute to the advancement of such themes, particularly with university students.

Suggested Citation

  • Luis Felipe Dias Lopes & Bianca Michels Chaves & Adriane Fabrício & Adriana Porto & Damiana Machado de Almeida & Sandra Leonara Obregon & Mauren Pimentel Lima & Wesley Vieira da Silva & Maria Emilia C, 2020. "Analysis of Well-Being and Anxiety among University Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3874-:d:364977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3874/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3874/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard M. Ryan & Veronika Huta & Edward Deci, 2008. "Living well: a self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 139-170, January.
    2. Ana Silva & António Caetano, 2013. "Validation of the Flourishing Scale and Scale of Positive and Negative Experience in Portugal," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 110(2), pages 469-478, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Delhii Hoid & Dong-Ni Pan & Chun Liao & Xuebing Li, 2023. "Effects of a Smartphone-Based, Multisession Interpretation-Bias Modification for Anxiety: Positive Intervention Effects and Low Attrition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexandra Ganglmair-Wooliscroft & Ben Wooliscroft, 2019. "Well-Being and Everyday Ethical Consumption," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 141-163, January.
    2. Małgorzata W Kożusznik & José M Peiró & Aida Soriano, 2019. "Daily eudaimonic well-being as a predictor of daily performance: A dynamic lens," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Sjoerd Halem & Eeske Roekel & Jaap Denissen, 2024. "Understanding the Dynamics of Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives on Daily Well-Being: Insights from Experience Sampling Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 25(7), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Violeta Misheva, 2016. "What Determines Emotional Well-Being? The Role of Adverse Experiences: Evidence Using Twin Data," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1921-1937, October.
    5. Andrew D. Napier & Gavin R. Slemp & Dianne A. Vella-Brodrick, 2024. "Crafting One’s Life and its Relationship with Psychological Needs: A Scoping Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 19(4), pages 2063-2101, August.
    6. Geurim Han & Junghwa Kim & Sun W. Park, 2018. "Extrinsic Value Orientation and Decreased Sustainability of Shared Resources: The Moderating Role of Situational Characteristics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Therese Kobbeltvedt & Katharina Wolff, 2009. "The Risk-as-feelings hypothesis in a Theory-of-planned-behaviour perspective," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 4(7), pages 567-586, December.
    8. Isabella Romano & Mark A. Ferro & Karen A. Patte & Ed Diener & Scott T. Leatherdale, 2020. "Measurement Invariance of the Flourishing Scale among a Large Sample of Canadian Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Waratta Authayarat & Hiroyuki Umemuro, 2012. "Workplace Environment Characteristics as Antecedents of Affective Well-being in the Workplace," International Journal of Business Research and Management (IJBRM), Computer Science Journals (CSC Journals), vol. 3(6), pages 307-324, December.
    10. Mohsen Joshanloo, 2013. "A Comparison of Western and Islamic Conceptions of Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 14(6), pages 1857-1874, December.
    11. Brand-Correa, Lina I. & Steinberger, Julia K., 2017. "A Framework for Decoupling Human Need Satisfaction From Energy Use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 43-52.
    12. Jen-Ho Chang & Chin-Lan Huang & Yi-Cheng Lin, 2015. "Mindfulness, Basic Psychological Needs Fulfillment, and Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 16(5), pages 1149-1162, October.
    13. Schubert, Christian, 2015. "Opportunity And Preference Learning," Economics and Philosophy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 275-295, July.
    14. Marta Martín-Carbonell & Irene Checa & Martha Fernández-Daza & Yadid Paternina & Begoña Espejo, 2021. "Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Scale of Positive and Negative Experience (SPANE) in the General Colombian Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    15. Nona C. Kiknadze & Blaine J. Fowers, 2023. "Cultural Variation in Flourishing," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 24(7), pages 2223-2244, October.
    16. Gregor Wolbring, 2022. "Auditing the ‘Social’ of Quantum Technologies: A Scoping Review," Societies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-38, March.
    17. Ana Junça-Silva, 2022. "Friends with Benefits: The Positive Consequences of Pet-Friendly Practices for Workers’ Well-Being," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-10, January.
    18. Qin Yang & Young-Chan Lee, 2021. "Why Do People Hide Knowledge in the Online Knowledge Community? An Integrated Framework of Protection Motivation, Self-Determination, and Social Exchange Beliefs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-24, September.
    19. Horacio Molina-Sánchez & Gabriele Giorgi & Dante Castillo Guajardo & Antonio Ariza-Montes, 2022. "Special Issue “Rethinking the Subjective Wellbeing for a New Workplace Scenario”," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-6, April.
    20. Kautonen, Teemu & Kibler, Ewald & Minniti, Maria, 2017. "Late-career entrepreneurship, income and quality of life," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 318-333.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3874-:d:364977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.