IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3845-d364246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationships between Economic Scarcity, Concrete Mindset and Risk Behavior: A Study of Nicaraguan Adolescents

Author

Listed:
  • Pilar Aguilar

    (ETEA-Instituto de Desarrollo, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, 14004 Córdoba, Spain)

  • Amparo Caballero

    (Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Verónica Sevillano

    (Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Itziar Fernández

    (Department of Social and Organizational Psychology, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, UNED, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Dolores Muñoz

    (Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Pilar Carrera

    (Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Background: Nicaragua is one of the poorest countries in Latin America, with an extremely low human development index (HDI). Fifty-two percent of the Nicaraguan population are children and adolescents under 18 years of age. Nicaraguan adolescents present several risk behaviors (such as teenage pregnancies, consumption of alcohol, tobacco, cannabis). Our study examines the links between risk behaviors, fatalism, real economic scarcity, and concrete construal level for adolescents with low and middle-low socioeconomic status in Nicaragua. Methods: Nicaraguan adolescents ( N = 834) from schools located in especially vulnerable areas (low economic status) or in neighborhoods with middle-low social class completed several scales and questions to evaluate fatalism (SFC—social fatalism scale), construal level (BIF) and their past and future risk behaviors (smoking cigarettes, smoking cannabis, unsafe sex, and alcohol consumption). Results: We identified that the poorest individuals who maintained a concrete style of thinking had the highest rates of past and future risk behaviors. This vulnerable group also reported the highest levels of fatalism, i.e., negative attitudes and feelings of helplessness. Encouragingly, the adolescents who were able to maintain an abstract mindset reported healthier past and future habits and lower fatalism, even when they belonged to the lowest social status. In the middle-low economic group, the construal level was not as relevant to maintaining healthy habits, as adolescents reported similar rates of past and future risk behavior at both construal levels. Conclusions: All these results support the importance of considering construal level when studying vulnerable populations and designing risk prevention programs.

Suggested Citation

  • Pilar Aguilar & Amparo Caballero & Verónica Sevillano & Itziar Fernández & Dolores Muñoz & Pilar Carrera, 2020. "The Relationships between Economic Scarcity, Concrete Mindset and Risk Behavior: A Study of Nicaraguan Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3845-:d:364246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3845/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3845/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jochim Hansen & Florian Kutzner & Michaela Wänke, 2013. "Money and Thinking: Reminders of Money Trigger Abstract Construal and Shape Consumer Judgments," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 39(6), pages 1154-1166.
    2. Darío Díaz & Amalio Blanco & Miriam Bajo & Maria Stavraki, 2015. "Fatalism and Well-Being Across Hispanic Cultures: The Social Fatalism Scales (SFS)," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 929-945, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dimitriu, Radu & Warlop, Luk, 2022. "Is similarity a constraint for service-to-service brand extensions?," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1019-1041.
    2. Luqiong Tong & Yuhuang Zheng & Ping Zhao, 2013. "Is money really the root of all evil? The impact of priming money on consumer choice," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 119-129, June.
    3. Gurzki, Hannes & Woisetschläger, David M., 2017. "Mapping the luxury research landscape: A bibliometric citation analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 147-166.
    4. Gasiorowska, Agata, 2012. "Psychologiczne skutki aktywacji idei pieniędzy a obdarowywanie bliskich [The psychological consequences of mere exposure to money and gift-giving]," MPRA Paper 48170, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Navarro, Raúl & Yubero, Santiago & Larrañaga, Elisa, 2018. "Cyberbullying victimization and fatalism in adolescence: Resilience as a moderator," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 215-221.
    6. Liu, Yunxin & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2021. "A replication study of the credit card effect on spending behavior and an extension to mobile payments," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    7. Kim Saxton, M. & Colby, Helen & Saxton, Todd & Pasumarti, Vikram, 2024. "Why or How? the impact of Construal-Level Theory on vaccine message receptivity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    8. Yao, Qing & Chen, Rong, 2014. "Gift Cards and Gifted Cash: The Impact of Fit between Gift Type and Message Construal," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 90(4), pages 481-492.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3845-:d:364246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.