IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p74-d300249.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on PM 2.5 Concentration in China’s Inland Cities: A Case Study from Chengdu Plain Economic Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Ye Yang

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agriculture University, Dujiangyan 611830, China)

  • Haifeng Lan

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang 621010, China)

  • Jing Li

    (School of Architecture and Urban-Rural Planning, Sichuan Agriculture University, Dujiangyan 611830, China)

Abstract

Particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ), one of the main sources of air pollution, has increasingly become a concern of the people and governments in China. Examining the socioeconomic factors influencing on PM 2.5 concentration is important for regional prevention and control. Previous studies mainly concentrated on the economically developed eastern coastal cities, but few studies focused on inland cities. This study selected Chengdu Plain Economic Zone (CPEZ), an inland region with heavy smog, and used spatial econometrics methods to identify the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of PM 2.5 concentration and the socioeconomic factors underlying it from 2006 to 2016. Moran’s index indicates that PM 2.5 concentration in CPEZ does have spatial aggregation characteristics. In general, the spatial clustering from the fluctuation state to the stable low state decreased by 1% annually on average, from 0.190 ( p < 0.05) in 2006 to 0.083 ( p < 0.1) in 2016. According to the results of the spatial Durbin model (SDM), socioeconomic factors including population density, energy consumption per unit of output, gross domestic product (GDP), and per capita GDP have a positive effect on PM 2.5 concentration, while greening rate and per capita park space have a negative effect. Additionally, those factors have identified spatial spillover effects on PM 2.5 concentration. This study could be a reference and support for the formulation of more efficient air pollution control policies in inland cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye Yang & Haifeng Lan & Jing Li, 2019. "Spatial Econometric Analysis of the Impact of Socioeconomic Factors on PM 2.5 Concentration in China’s Inland Cities: A Case Study from Chengdu Plain Economic Zone," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:74-:d:300249
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/74/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/74/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chuanglin Fang & Haimeng Liu & Guangdong Li & Dongqi Sun & Zhuang Miao, 2015. "Estimating the Impact of Urbanization on Air Quality in China Using Spatial Regression Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-23, November.
    2. Chen, Jing & Zhou, Chunshan & Wang, Shaojian & Li, Shijie, 2018. "Impacts of energy consumption structure, energy intensity, economic growth, urbanization on PM2.5 concentrations in countries globally," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 94-105.
    3. Bo Li & Xuejing Liu & Zhenhong Li, 2015. "Using the STIRPAT model to explore the factors driving regional CO 2 emissions: a case of Tianjin, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(3), pages 1667-1685, April.
    4. James P. Lesage, 2008. "An Introduction to Spatial Econometrics," Revue d'économie industrielle, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(3), pages 19-44.
    5. Wen-Wen Zhang & Basil Sharp & Shi-Chun Xu, 2019. "Does economic growth and energy consumption drive environmental degradation in China’s 31 provinces? New evidence from a spatial econometric perspective," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(42), pages 4658-4671, September.
    6. Shen Zhao & Yong Xu, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Variation Characteristics and Influencing Factors of PM 2.5 Pollution in China: Evidence from 289 Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Ruoyu Yang & Weidong Chen, 2019. "Spatial Correlation, Influencing Factors and Environmental Supervision on Mechanism Construction of Atmospheric Pollution: An Empirical Study on SO 2 Emissions in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Yi Yang & Jie Li & Guobin Zhu & Qiangqiang Yuan, 2019. "Spatio–Temporal Relationship and Evolvement of Socioeconomic Factors and PM 2.5 in China During 1998–2016," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    9. J. Elhorst, 2010. "Applied Spatial Econometrics: Raising the Bar," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 9-28.
    10. Bao, Shuming & Chang, Gene Hsin & Sachs, Jeffrey D. & Woo, Wing Thye, 2002. "Geographic factors and China's regional development under market reforms, 1978-1998," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 89-111.
    11. Yigang Wei & Cui Huang & Patrick T. I. Lam & Yong Sha & Yong Feng, 2015. "Using Urban-Carrying Capacity as a Benchmark for Sustainable Urban Development: An Empirical Study of Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-25, March.
    12. Ji, Xi & Yao, Yixin & Long, Xianling, 2018. "What causes PM2.5 pollution? Cross-economy empirical analysis from socioeconomic perspective," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 458-472.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jin-Wei Yan & Fei Tao & Shuai-Qian Zhang & Shuang Lin & Tong Zhou, 2021. "Spatiotemporal Distribution Characteristics and Driving Forces of PM2.5 in Three Urban Agglomerations of the Yangtze River Economic Belt," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Wang Jie & Rabnawaz Khan, 2024. "Breaking the CO 2 Gridlock: Can Renewables Lead the Way for the OECD?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-29, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tuo Shi & Yuanman Hu & Miao Liu & Chunlin Li & Chuyi Zhang & Chong Liu, 2020. "How Do Economic Growth, Urbanization, and Industrialization Affect Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations? An Assessment in Liaoning Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-14, July.
    2. Yao Zhang & Taoyuan Wei & Wentao Tian & Kai Zhao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and Driving Mechanism of Coupling Coordination between New-Type Urbanization and Ecological Environment in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-19, September.
    3. Huanhuan Xiong & Lingyu Lan & Longwu Liang & Yaobin Liu & Xiaoyu Xu, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Differences and Dynamic Evolution of PM 2.5 Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Hansol Mun & Mengying Li & Juchul Jung, 2022. "Spatial-Temporal Characteristics and Influencing Factors of Particulate Matter: Geodetector Approach," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-26, December.
    5. Junjie Cao & Yao Zhang & Taoyuan Wei & Hui Sun, 2021. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Influencing Factors of Coordinated Development of the Population, Resources, Economy and Environment (PREE) System: Evidence from 31 Provinces in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Simon K. C. Cheung & Tommy K. Y. Cheung, 2022. "Mixed membership nearest neighbor model with feature difference," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(8), pages 1578-1594, December.
    7. Emil Georgiev & Emil Mihaylov, 2015. "Economic growth and the environment: reassessing the environmental Kuznets Curve for air pollution emissions in OECD countries," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 29-47, March.
    8. Eleonora Dávalos & Leonardo Fabio Morales, 2023. "Diffusion of crime control benefits: forced eradication and coca crops in Colombia," Spatial Economic Analysis, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(3), pages 292-317, July.
    9. Julie Bulteau & Thierry Feuillet & Rémy Le Boennec, 2018. "Spatial Heterogeneity of Sustainable Transportation Offer Values: A Comparative Analysis of Nantes Urban and Periurban/Rural Areas (France)," Post-Print hal-04362203, HAL.
    10. De Salvo, Maria & Capitello, Roberta & Gaudenzi, Barbara & Begalli, Diego, 2019. "Risk management strategies and residual risk perception in the wine industry: A spatial analysis in Northeast Italy," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 47-62.
    11. Amarin Siripanich & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Emily Moylan, 2019. "Interaction of Public Transport Accessibility and Residential Property Values Using Smart Card Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, May.
    12. Vélez-Henao, Johan-Andrés & Font Vivanco, David & Hernández-Riveros, Jesús-Antonio, 2019. "Technological change and the rebound effect in the STIRPAT model: A critical view," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 1372-1381.
    13. Lv, Zhike & Liu, Wangxin & Xu, Ting, 2022. "Evaluating the impact of information and communication technology on renewable energy consumption: A spatial econometric approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 1-12.
    14. Rosalia Castellano & Gaetano Musella & Gennaro Punzo, 2019. "The effect of environmental attitudes and policies on separate waste collection: the case of Insular Italy," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 63-85, April.
    15. Yu Sang Chang & Byong-Jin You & Hann Earl Kim, 2020. "Dynamic Trends of Fine Particulate Matter Exposure across 190 Countries: Analysis and Key Insights," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-34, April.
    16. Wenqin Gong & Yu Kong, 2022. "Nonlinear Influence of Chinese Real Estate Development on Environmental Pollution: New Evidence from Spatial Econometric Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-22, January.
    17. Ruyin Long & Qin Zhang & Hong Chen & Meifen Wu & Qianwen Li, 2020. "Measurement of the Energy Intensity of Human Well-Being and Spatial Econometric Analysis of Its Influencing Factors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
    18. Chun Liu & Gui-hua Nie, 2021. "Identifying the Driving Factors of Food Nitrogen Footprint in China, 2000–2018: Econometric Analysis of Provincial Spatial Panel Data by the STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-23, May.
    19. Hongjie Bao & Ling Shan & Yufei Wang & Yuehua Jiang & Cheonjae Lee & Xufeng Cui, 2021. "How Does Local Real Estate Investment Influence Neighborhood PM 2.5 Concentrations? A Spatial Econometric Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-21, May.
    20. Raffaella Santolini, 2020. "Spatial effects on local government efficiency," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 99(1), pages 183-200, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:74-:d:300249. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.