IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2019i1p231-d302808.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Technological Scenario for a Healthier, More Equitable and Sustainable Europe in 2040: Citizen Perceptions and Policy Implications

Author

Listed:
  • Arlind Xhelili

    (Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP), 42107 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Rosa Strube

    (Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP), 42107 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Francesca Grossi

    (Collaborating Centre on Sustainable Consumption and Production (CSCP), 42107 Wuppertal, Germany)

  • Iva Zvěřinová

    (Charles University, Environment Centre (CUNI), 162 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

  • Timothy Taylor

    (European Centre on Environment and Human Health, University of Exeter Medical School, Truro TR1 3HD, UK)

  • Pablo Martinez-Juarez

    (Health Economics Group, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter EX1 2LU, UK)

  • Sonia Quiroga

    (Department of Economics, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá, Spain)

  • Cristina Suárez

    (Department of Economics, Universidad de Alcalá, 28801 Alcalá, Spain)

  • Dragan Gjorgjev

    (The Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Macedonia (IJZRM), 1000 Skopje, North Macedonia)

Abstract

This article aims at exploring, understanding and comparing European citizens’ insights and perceptions towards “My life between realities”, a positive future scenario which depicts a narrative of reaching healthier, more equitable and sustainable societies by 2040 with the support of technology and technological solutions. It responds to the need for gathering and incorporating more citizen insights into future policy developments and strategic actions to tackle the global challenge of unsustainable development. Citizens of five European countries—the Czech Republic, Germany, North Macedonia, Spain and the United Kingdom—have been consulted through focus groups. The exercise has uncovered citizens’ preferences and attitudes towards four main lifestyle areas; namely, green spaces, energy efficient housing, active mobility and (food) consumption. The technological attributes of the scenario led to citizens expressing diametrically opposed and critical perceptions and attitudes. Given the prospects of technology in driving sustainable development, based on these insights, policy recommendations for the better integration and acceptance of technological advances by the public are discussed herein.

Suggested Citation

  • Arlind Xhelili & Rosa Strube & Francesca Grossi & Iva Zvěřinová & Timothy Taylor & Pablo Martinez-Juarez & Sonia Quiroga & Cristina Suárez & Dragan Gjorgjev, 2019. "A Technological Scenario for a Healthier, More Equitable and Sustainable Europe in 2040: Citizen Perceptions and Policy Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-18, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:231-:d:302808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/231/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/1/231/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cornwall, Andrea & Jewkes, Rachel, 1995. "What is participatory research?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 41(12), pages 1667-1676, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Caroline Patsias & Anne Latendresse & Laurence Bherer, 2013. "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 2214-2230, November.
    2. Ines Testoni & Irene Nencioni & Maibrit Arbien & Erika Iacona & Francesca Marrella & Vittoria Gorzegno & Cristina Selmi & Francesca Vianello & Alfonso Nava & Adriano Zamperini & Michael Alexander Wies, 2021. "Mental Health in Prison: Integrating the Perspectives of Prison Staff," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Zemadim, B. & McCartney, Matthew & Langan, Simon & Sharma, Bharat, 2013. "A participatory approach for hydrometeorological monitoring in the Blue Nile River Basin of Ethiopia," IWMI Reports 201009, International Water Management Institute.
    4. Lisa M. Vaughn & MaryAnn Lohmueller, 2014. "Calling All Stakeholders," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 336-355, August.
    5. Ana Luiza Fontenelle & Erik Nilsson & Ieda Geriberto Hidalgo & Cintia B. Uvo & Drielli Peyerl, 2022. "Temporal Understanding of the Water–Energy Nexus: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. So Pyay Thar & Thiagarajah Ramilan & Robert J. Farquharson & Deli Chen, 2021. "Identifying Potential for Decision Support Tools through Farm Systems Typology Analysis Coupled with Participatory Research: A Case for Smallholder Farmers in Myanmar," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-20, June.
    7. Theresia Krieger & Sandra Salm & Antje Dresen & Anna Arning & Kathrin Schwickerath & Andrea Göttel & Stefanie Houwaart & Holger Pfaff & Natalia Cecon, 2022. "Optimizing Patient Information Material for a New Psycho-Oncological Care Program Using a Participatory Health Research Approach in Germany," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-17, January.
    8. Sollis, Kate & Yap, Mandy & Campbell, Paul & Biddle, Nicholas, 2022. "Conceptualisations of wellbeing and quality of life: A systematic review of participatory studies," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    9. Bernard Amadei, 2020. "A Systems Approach to Building Community Capacity and Resilience," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Chung, Kimberly & Lounsbury, David W., 2006. "The role of power, process, and relationships in participatory research for statewide HIV/AIDS programming," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2129-2140, October.
    11. Alexandra Lenis Escobar & Ramón Rueda López & Jorge E. García Guerrero & Enrique Salinas Cuadrado, 2020. "Design of Strategies for the Implementation and Management of a Complementary Monetary System Using the SWOT-AHP Methodology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    12. Melvyn W.B. Zhang & Jiangbo Ying, 2019. "Incorporating Participatory Action Research in Attention Bias Modification Interventions for Addictive Disorders: Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Nidhi Wali & Andre M N Renzaho, 2018. "“Our riches are our family”, the changing family dynamics & social capital for new migrant families in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, December.
    14. John‐Michael Davis & Yaakov Garb, 2019. "Participatory shaping of community futures in e‐waste processing hubs: Complexity, conflict and stewarded convergence in a Palestinian context," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 37(1), pages 67-89, January.
    15. Corrine Nöel Knapp & Robin S. Reid & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Julia A. Klein & Kathleen A. Galvin, 2019. "Placing Transdisciplinarity in Context: A Review of Approaches to Connect Scholars, Society and Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    16. Hamzeh, J. & Pluye, P. & Bush, P.L. & Ruchon, C. & Vedel, I. & Hudon, C., 2019. "Towards an assessment for organizational participatory research health partnerships: A systematic mixed studies review with framework synthesis," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 116-128.
    17. Catherine Wilkinson & Samantha Wilkinson, 2017. "Doing It Write: Representation and Responsibility in Writing Up Participatory Research Involving Young People," Social Inclusion, Cogitatio Press, vol. 5(3), pages 219-227.
    18. Kahina Le Louvier & Perla Innocenti, 2022. "Heritage as an affective and meaningful information literacy practice: An interdisciplinary approach to the integration of asylum seekers and refugees," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(5), pages 687-701, May.
    19. Jashim Uddin Ahmed, 2009. "Action Research: A New Look," KASBIT Business Journals (KBJ), Khadim Ali Shah Bukhari Institute of Technology (KASBIT), vol. 2, pages 19-33, December.
    20. Ilan Kelman & Myles Harris, 2020. "Linking Disaster Risk Reduction and Healthcare in Locations with Limited Accessibility: Challenges and Opportunities of Participatory Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2019:i:1:p:231-:d:302808. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.