IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i7p1271-d221299.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

PM 2.5 Cooperative Control with Fuzzy Cost and Fuzzy Coalitions

Author

Listed:
  • Zhen Zhou

    (School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China)

  • Meijia Zhang

    (School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China)

  • Xiaohui Yu

    (School of Logistics, Beijing Wuzi University, Beijing 101149, China)

  • Xijun He

    (College of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China)

  • Kang Wang

    (School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China)

  • Quan Shao

    (School of Economics and Management Engineering, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Jie Wang

    (School of Management, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100089, China)

  • Hongxia Sun

    (School of Business, Beijing Industrial and Commercial University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

Haze control cost is hard to value by a crisp number because it is often affected by various factors such as regional uncertain meteorological conditions and topographical features. Furthermore, regions may be involved in different coalitions for haze control with different levels of effort. In this paper, we propose a PM 2.5 cooperative control model with fuzzy cost and crisp coalitions or fuzzy coalitions based on the uncertain cross-border transmission factor. We focus on the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regions of China and obtain the following major findings. In the case of haze control in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regions of China, local governments in the global crisp coalition can achieve their emission reduction targets with the lowest aggregated cost. However, Hebei fails to satisfy its individual rationality if there is no cost sharing. Therefore, the Hukuhara–Shapley value is used to allocate the aggregated cost among these regions so that the grand coalition is stable. However, the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei regions cannot achieve their emission reduction targets in the global fuzzy coalition without government subsidies.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhen Zhou & Meijia Zhang & Xiaohui Yu & Xijun He & Kang Wang & Quan Shao & Jie Wang & Hongxia Sun, 2019. "PM 2.5 Cooperative Control with Fuzzy Cost and Fuzzy Coalitions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1271-:d:221299
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1271/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/7/1271/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shawei He & Keith Hipel & D. Kilgour, 2014. "Water Diversion Conflicts in China: A Hierarchical Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1823-1837, May.
    2. Armaghan Abed-Elmdoust & Reza Kerachian, 2012. "Water Resources Allocation Using a Cooperative Game with Fuzzy Payoffs and Fuzzy Coalitions," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(13), pages 3961-3976, October.
    3. Zhisong Chen & Huimin Wang & Xiangtong Qi, 2013. "Pricing and Water Resource Allocation Scheme for the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(5), pages 1457-1472, March.
    4. Armaghan Abed-Elmdoust & Reza Kerachian, 2013. "Incorporating Economic and Political Considerations in Inter-Basin Water Allocations: A Case Study," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 27(3), pages 859-870, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhisong Chen & Lingling Pei, 2018. "Inter-Basin Water Transfer Green Supply Chain Equilibrium and Coordination under Social Welfare Maximization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-28, April.
    2. Shawei He & Keith Hipel & D. Kilgour, 2014. "Water Diversion Conflicts in China: A Hierarchical Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(7), pages 1823-1837, May.
    3. Armaghan Abed-Elmdoust & Reza Kerachian, 2014. "Evaluating the Relative Power of Water Users in Inter-Basin Water Transfer Systems," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(2), pages 495-509, January.
    4. Chunlong Li & Jianzhong Zhou & Shuo Ouyang & Chao Wang & Yi Liu, 2015. "Water Resources Optimal Allocation Based on Large-scale Reservoirs in the Upper Reaches of Yangtze River," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(7), pages 2171-2187, May.
    5. Mahdi Zarghami & Nasim Safari & Ferenc Szidarovszky & Shafiqul Islam, 2015. "Nonlinear Interval Parameter Programming Combined with Cooperative Games: a Tool for Addressing Uncertainty in Water Allocation Using Water Diplomacy Framework," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 29(12), pages 4285-4303, September.
    6. Marcella Maia Urtiga & Danielle Costa Morais & Keith W. Hipel & D. Marc Kilgour, 2017. "Group Decision Methodology to Support Watershed Committees in Choosing Among Combinations of Alternatives," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 729-752, July.
    7. S. Jamshid Mousavi & Nasrin Rafiee Anzab & Bentolhoda Asl-Rousta & Joong Hoon Kim, 2017. "Multi-Objective Optimization-Simulation for Reliability-Based Inter-Basin Water Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(11), pages 3445-3464, September.
    8. Lijun Jiao & Ruimin Liu & Linfang Wang & Lin Li & Leiping Cao, 2021. "Evaluating Spatiotemporal Variations in the Impact of Inter-basin Water Transfer Projects in Water-receiving Basin," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(15), pages 5409-5429, December.
    9. Ben Li & Guangming Tan & Gang Chen, 2016. "Generalized Uncooperative Planar Game Theory Model for Water Distribution in Transboundary Rivers," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 30(1), pages 225-241, January.
    10. Maryam Ghashghaie & Safar Marofi & Hossein Marofi, 2014. "Using System Dynamics Method to Determine the Effect of Water Demand Priorities on Downstream Flow," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 28(14), pages 5055-5072, November.
    11. Shen, Jianjian & Cheng, Chuntian & Zhang, Xiufei & Zhou, Binbin, 2018. "Coordinated operations of multiple-reservoir cascaded hydropower plants with cooperation benefit allocation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 509-518.
    12. Liangyan Tao & Xuebi Su & Saad Ahmed Javed, 2021. "Inverse Preference Optimization in the Graph Model for Conflict Resolution based on the Genetic Algorithm," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1085-1112, October.
    13. Giri R. Kattel & Wenxiu Shang & Zhongjing Wang & John Langford, 2019. "China’s South-to-North Water Diversion Project Empowers Sustainable Water Resources System in the North," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-12, July.
    14. Kaiyong Wang & Pengyan Zhang & Bo Pang, 2018. "Process and Mechanism of Agricultural Irrigation Benefit Allocation Coefficient Based on Emergy Analysis—A Case Study of Henan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-15, November.
    15. Zhe Cheng & Yuntong Zhao & Tao Song & Le Cheng & Wenbin Wang, 2023. "White Elephant or Golden Goose? An Assessment of Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project from the Perspective of Regional Water Use Efficiency," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 37(2), pages 819-834, January.
    16. Liang Zhang & Sisi Li & Hugo A. Loáiciga & Yanhua Zhuang & Yun Du, 2015. "Opportunities and challenges of interbasin water transfers: a literature review with bibliometric analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(1), pages 279-294, October.
    17. Mohammad Nikoo & Reza Kerachian & Mohammad Niksokhan, 2012. "Equitable Waste Load Allocation in Rivers Using Fuzzy Bi-matrix Games," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(15), pages 4539-4552, December.
    18. He, Shawei & Marc Kilgour, D. & Hipel, Keith W., 2017. "A general hierarchical graph model for conflict resolution with application to greenhouse gas emission disputes between USA and China," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(3), pages 919-932.
    19. Wenyi Du & Yubing Fan & Lina Yan, 2018. "Pricing Strategies for Competitive Water Supply Chains under Different Power Structures: An Application to the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-13, August.
    20. Zhisong Chen & Shong-Iee Ivan Su & Huimin Wang, 2019. "Inter-Basin Water Transfer Supply Chain Equilibrium and Coordination: A Social Welfare Maximization Perspective," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2577-2598, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:7:p:1271-:d:221299. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.