IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i6p1076-d217172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Continuous Rural-Urban Coding for Cancer Disparity Studies: Is It Appropriate for Statistical Analysis?

Author

Listed:
  • Lusine Yaghjyan

    (Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health and Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Christopher R. Cogle

    (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Guangran Deng

    (Department of Geography, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Jue Yang

    (Department of Geography, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Pauline Jackson

    (Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Nancy Hardt

    (College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Jaclyn Hall

    (Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

  • Liang Mao

    (Department of Geography, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32601, USA)

Abstract

Background : The dichotomization or categorization of rural-urban codes, as nominal variables, is a prevailing paradigm in cancer disparity studies. The paradigm represents continuous rural-urban transition as discrete groups, which results in a loss of ordering information and landscape continuum, and thus may contribute to mixed findings in the literature. Few studies have examined the validity of using rural-urban codes as continuous variables in the same analysis. Methods : We geocoded cancer cases in north central Florida between 2005 and 2010 collected by Florida Cancer Data System. Using a linear hierarchical model, we regressed the occurrence of late stage cancer (including breast, colorectal, hematological, lung, and prostate cancer) on the rural-urban codes as continuous variables. To validate, the results were compared to those from using a truly continuous rurality data of the same study region. Results : In term of associations with late-stage cancer risk, the regression analysis showed that the use of rural-urban codes as continuous variables produces consistent outcomes with those from the truly continuous rurality for all types of cancer. Particularly, the rural-urban codes at the census tract level yield the closest estimation and are recommended to use when the continuous rurality data is not available. Conclusions : Methodologically, it is valid to treat rural-urban codes directly as continuous variables in cancer studies, in addition to converting them into categories. This proposed continuous-variable method offers researchers more flexibility in their choice of analytic methods and preserves the information in the ordering. It can better inform how cancer risk varies, degree by degree, over a finer spectrum of rural-urban landscape.

Suggested Citation

  • Lusine Yaghjyan & Christopher R. Cogle & Guangran Deng & Jue Yang & Pauline Jackson & Nancy Hardt & Jaclyn Hall & Liang Mao, 2019. "Continuous Rural-Urban Coding for Cancer Disparity Studies: Is It Appropriate for Statistical Analysis?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1076-:d:217172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1076/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/6/1076/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald Cossman & Jeralynn Cossman & Arthur Cosby & Rebel Reavis, 2008. "Reconsidering the Rural–Urban Continuum in Rural Health Research: A Test of Stable Relationships Using Mortality as a Health Measure," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 27(4), pages 459-476, August.
    2. Smith, Blair J. & Parvin, David W., 1973. "Defining and Measuring Rurality," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(1), pages 109-113, July.
    3. Waldorf, Brigitte S., 2006. "A Continuous Multi-dimensional Measure of Rurality: Moving Beyond Threshold Measures," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21383, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Haynes, Robin & Pearce, Jamie & Barnett, Ross, 2008. "Cancer survival in New Zealand: Ethnic, social and geographical inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(6), pages 928-937, September.
    5. Smith, Blair J. & Parvin, David W., Jr., 1973. "Defining And Measuring Rurality," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 5(1), pages 1-5, July.
    6. Mao, Liang & Stacciarini, Jeanne-Marie R. & Smith, Rebekah & Wiens, Brenda, 2015. "An individual-based rurality measure and its health application: A case study of Latino immigrants in North Florida, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 300-308.
    7. Shugarman, L.R. & Sorbero, M.E.S. & Tian, H. & Jain, A.K. & Ashwood, J.S., 2008. "An exploration of urban and rural differences in lung cancer survival among medicare beneficiaries," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 98(7), pages 1280-1287.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Smith, Blair J. & Parvin, David W., Jr., 1975. "Estimating The Relative Rurality Of U.S. Counties," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 7(2), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Steinführer, Annett, 2021. "Urbanität und Ruralität: Kleinstädte im "Dazwischen"?," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Steinführer, Annett & Porsche, Lars & Sondermann, Martin (ed.), Kompendium Kleinstadtforschung, volume 16, pages 62-84, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Tse-Chuan Yang & Stephen A Matthews, 2015. "Death by Segregation: Does the Dimension of Racial Segregation Matter?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-26, September.
    4. Man Wang & Rachel Garshick Kleit & Jane Cover & Christopher S. Fowler, 2012. "Spatial Variations in US Poverty," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(3), pages 563-585, February.
    5. Tong Wang & David A. Hennessy & Annette M. O'Connor, 2010. "Where Are the Veterinarian Shortage Areas Anyway?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 10-wp513, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    6. Viñas Carmen Delgado, 2019. "Depopulation Processes in European Rural Areas: A Case Study of Cantabria (Spain)," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(3), pages 341-369, September.
    7. Kimhi, Ayal & Sarit Menahem-Carmi, 2017. "Does rural household income depend on neighboring urban centers?Evidence from Israel," Review of Applied Socio-Economic Research, Pro Global Science Association, vol. 13(1), pages 26-35, JUNE.
    8. Waldorf, Brigitte S., 2007. "The Effects Of Rurality And Industrial Specialization Income Growth: U.S. Counties 2000 To 2003," Working papers 7334, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    9. Beghin, John C. & Meade, Birgit Gisela Saager & Rosen, Stacey, 2014. "A Consistent Food Demand Framework for International Food Security Assessment," 2014: Food, Resources and Conflict, December 7-9, 2014. San Diego, California 197167, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    10. Thomas F. P. Wiesen & Todd Gabe & Lakshya Bharadwaj, 2023. "Econometric connectedness as a measure of urban influence: evidence from Maine," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    11. Ge Shi & Jingran Zhang & Jiahang Liu & Jinghai Xu & Yu Chen & Yutong Wang, 2024. "Spatial Analysis of Lung Cancer Patients and Associated Influencing Factors from the Perspective of Urban Sustainable Development: A Case Study of Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-16, November.
    12. Carmen Delgado-Viñas & María-Luisa Gómez-Moreno, 2022. "The Interaction between Urban and Rural Areas: An Updated Paradigmatic, Methodological and Bibliographic Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, August.
    13. Tong Wang & David A. Hennessy & Seong C. Park, 2016. "Demand Side Change, Rurality, and Gender in the United States Veterinarian Market, 1990–2010," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(2), pages 236-253, April.
    14. Pearson, Amber L. & Pearce, Jamie & Kingham, Simon, 2013. "Deprived yet healthy: Neighbourhood-level resilience in New Zealand," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 238-245.
    15. Rekhter, Natalia & Ermasova, Natalia, 2021. "Culture of prevention and early disease detection of cancer in Russia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    16. Mao, Liang & Stacciarini, Jeanne-Marie R. & Smith, Rebekah & Wiens, Brenda, 2015. "An individual-based rurality measure and its health application: A case study of Latino immigrants in North Florida, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 300-308.
    17. Sun, Feinuo, 2022. "Rurality and opioid prescribing rates in U.S. counties from 2006 to 2018: A spatiotemporal investigation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    18. Ellen M. Hoffmann & Monish Jose & Nils Nölke & Thomas Möckel, 2017. "Construction and Use of a Simple Index of Urbanisation in the Rural–Urban Interface of Bangalore, India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-21, November.
    19. Yang, Tse-Chuan & Chen, Vivian Yi-Ju & Shoff, Carla & Matthews, Stephen A., 2012. "Using quantile regression to examine the effects of inequality across the mortality distribution in the U.S. counties," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(12), pages 1900-1910.
    20. Eathington, Liesl, 2015. "Nanopolitans and Picopolitans: Exploring the Value of Core-Based Definitions Below the Micropolitan Level," Staff General Research Papers Archive 38991, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:6:p:1076-:d:217172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.