IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i3p484-d204057.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bicycle Facilities Safest from Crime and Crashes: Perceptions of Residents Familiar with Higher Crime/Lower Income Neighborhoods in Boston

Author

Listed:
  • Anne C. Lusk

    (Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Walter C. Willett

    (Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

  • Vivien Morris

    (Mattapan Food and Fitness Coalition, Boston, MA 02126, USA)

  • Christopher Byner

    (Boston Centers for Youth & Families, Boston, MA 02120, USA)

  • Yanping Li

    (Department of Nutrition, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

While studies of bicyclist’s perceptions of crime and crash safety exist, it is also important to ask lower-income predominantly-minority residents what bicycle-route surface or context they perceive as safest from crime and crashes. With their insights, their chosen bike environments could be in engineering guidelines and built in their neighborhoods to improve residents’ health and lessen their risk of exposure to crime or crashing. This study involved two populations in Boston: (a) community-sense participants (eight groups-church/YMCA n = 116); and (b) street-sense participants (five groups-halfway house/homeless shelter/gang members n = 96). Participants ranked and described what they saw in 32 photographs of six types of bicycle environments. Quantitative data (Likert Scale 0–6 with 0 being low risk of crime/crash) involved regression analysis to test differences. Qualitative comments were categorized into 55 themes for surface or context and if high or low in association with crime or crashes. For crime, two-way cycle tracks had a significantly lower score (safest) than all others (2.35; p < 0.01) and share-use paths had a significantly higher score (least safe) (3.39; p < 0.01). For crashes, participants rated shared-use paths as safest (1.17) followed by two-way cycle tracks (1.68), one-way cycle tracks (2.95), bike lanes (4.06), sharrows (4.17), and roads (4.58), with a significant difference for any two groups ( p < 0.01) except between bike lane and sharrow ( p = 0.9). Street-sense participants ranked all, except shared-use paths, higher for crime and crash. For surface, wide two-way cycle tracks with freshly painted lines, stencils, and arrows were low risk for crime and a cycle track’s median, red color, stencils, and arrows low risk for crash. For context, clean signs, balconies, cafes, street lights, no cuts between buildings, and flowers were low risk for crime and witnesses, little traffic, and bike signals low risk for crash. As bicycle design guidelines and general Crime Perception Through Environmental Design (CPTED) principles do not include these details, perhaps new guidelines could be written.

Suggested Citation

  • Anne C. Lusk & Walter C. Willett & Vivien Morris & Christopher Byner & Yanping Li, 2019. "Bicycle Facilities Safest from Crime and Crashes: Perceptions of Residents Familiar with Higher Crime/Lower Income Neighborhoods in Boston," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:484-:d:204057
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/3/484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rachel Aldred & Bridget Elliott & James Woodcock & Anna Goodman, 2017. "Cycling provision separated from motor traffic: a systematic review exploring whether stated preferences vary by gender and age," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 29-55, January.
    2. Pucher, J. & Buehler, R., 2016. "Safer cycling through improved infrastructure," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 106(12), pages 2089-2091.
    3. Henderson, Jason, 2011. "Level of service: the politics of reconfiguring urban streets in San Francisco, CA," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1138-1144.
    4. Buehler, R. & Pucher, J., 2017. "Trends in walking and cycling safety: Recent evidence from high-income countries, with a focus on the United States and Germany," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(2), pages 281-287.
    5. Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R., 2003. "Health, Supportive Environments, and the Reasonable Person Model," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(9), pages 1484-1489.
    6. Zhan Guo, 2013. "Residential Street Parking and Car Ownership," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 32-48, January.
    7. Lusk, A.C. & Morency, P. & Miranda-Moreno, L.F. & Willett, W.C. & Dennerlein, J.T., 2013. "Bicycle guidelines and crash rates on cycle tracks in the United States," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(7), pages 1240-1248.
    8. Chen, L. & Chen, C. & Srinivasan, R. & McKnight, C.E. & Ewing, R. & Roe, M., 2012. "Evaluating the safety effects of bicycle lanes in New York City," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(6), pages 1120-1127.
    9. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303546_3 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Teschke, K. & Harris, M.A. & Reynolds, C.C.O. & Winters, M. & Babul, S. & Chipman, M. & Cusimano, M.D. & Brubacher, J.R. & Hunte, G. & Friedman, S.M. & Monro, M. & Shen, H. & Vernich, L. & Cripton, P., 2012. "Route infrastructure and the risk of injuries to bicyclists: A case-crossover study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 102(12), pages 2336-2343.
    11. Powell, L.M. & Slater, S. & Chaloupka, F.J. & Harper, D., 2006. "Availability of physical activity-related facilities and neighborhood demographic and socioeconomic characteristics: A national study," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(9), pages 1676-1680.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sagaris, Lake, 2018. "Citizen participation for sustainable transport: Lessons for change from Santiago and Temuco, Chile," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 402-410.
    2. Wang, Hwachyi & De Backer, Hans & Lauwers, Dirk & Chang, S.K.Jason, 2019. "A spatio-temporal mapping to assess bicycle collision risks on high-risk areas (Bridges) - A case study from Taipei (Taiwan)," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 94-109.
    3. Hwachyi Wang & S. K. Jason Chang & Hans De Backer & Dirk Lauwers & Philippe De Maeyer, 2019. "Integrating Spatial and Temporal Approaches for Explaining Bicycle Crashes in High-Risk Areas in Antwerp (Belgium)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Houde, Maxime & Apparicio, Philippe & Séguin, Anne-Marie, 2018. "A ride for whom: Has cycling network expansion reduced inequities in accessibility in Montreal, Canada?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 9-21.
    5. Marcel E Moran, 2021. "What’s your angle? Analyzing angled parking via satellite imagery to aid bike-network planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(7), pages 1912-1925, September.
    6. Teixeira, Inaian Pignatti & Rodrigues da Silva, Antônio Nélson & Schwanen, Tim & Manzato, Gustavo Garcia & Dörrzapf, Linda & Zeile, Peter & Dekoninck, Luc & Botteldooren, Dick, 2020. "Does cycling infrastructure reduce stress biomarkers in commuting cyclists? A comparison of five European cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Luís Rita & Miguel Peliteiro & Tudor-Codrin Bostan & Tiago Tamagusko & Adelino Ferreira, 2023. "Using Deep Learning and Google Street View Imagery to Assess and Improve Cyclist Safety in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Inés Alveano-Aguerrebere & Francisco Javier Ayvar-Campos & Maryam Farvid & Anne Lusk, 2017. "Bicycle Facilities That Address Safety, Crime, and Economic Development: Perceptions from Morelia, Mexico," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-22, December.
    9. John Pucher & Ralph Buehler, 2017. "Cycling towards a more sustainable transport future," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(6), pages 689-694, November.
    10. Gabriele Prati & Víctor Marín Puchades & Marco De Angelis & Federico Fraboni & Luca Pietrantoni, 2018. "Factors contributing to bicycle–motorised vehicle collisions: a systematic literature review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(2), pages 184-208, March.
    11. Barbour, Elisa & Jin, Janet & Goldsmith, Emma & Grover, Salvador & Martinez, Jacqueline & Handy, Susan, 2021. "Tensions and Trade-offs in Planning and Policymaking for Transit-Oriented Development, Transit, and Active Transport in California Cities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt49t729rc, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    12. Sékou Samadoulougou & Laurence Letarte & Alexandre Lebel, 2022. "Association between Neighbourhood Deprivation Trajectories and Self-Perceived Health: Analysis of a Linked Survey and Health Administrative Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-14, December.
    13. Van Holle, Veerle & Van Cauwenberg, Jelle & Deforche, Benedicte & Goubert, Liesbet & Maes, Lea & Nasar, Jack & Van de Weghe, Nico & Salmon, Jo & De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse, 2014. "Environmental invitingness for transport-related cycling in middle-aged adults: A proof of concept study using photographs," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 432-446.
    14. Lukas Adam & Tim Jones & Marco Brömmelstroet, 2020. "Planning for cycling in the dispersed city: establishing a hierarchy of effectiveness of municipal cycling policies," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 503-527, April.
    15. Anne Christine Lusk & Xin Li & Qiming Liu, 2023. "If the Government Pays for Full Home-Charger Installation, Would Affordable-Housing and Middle-Income Residents Buy Electric Vehicles?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-26, March.
    16. Meryem Hayir-Kanat & Jürgen Breuste, 2019. "Which Natural Areas are Preferred for Recreation? An Investigation of the Most Popular Natural Resting Types for Istanbul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-14, November.
    17. Steve O’Hern & Roni Utriainen & Hanne Tiikkaja & Markus Pöllänen & Niina Sihvola, 2021. "Exploratory Analysis of Pedestrian Road Trauma in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Tyler Prochnow & Meg Patterson & M. Renée Umstattd Meyer & Joseph Lightner & Luis Gomez & Joseph Sharkey, 2022. "Conducting Physical Activity Research on Racially and Ethnically Diverse Adolescents Using Social Network Analysis: Case Studies for Practical Use," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Scheiner, Joachim & Faust, Nico & Helmer, Johannes & Straub, Michael & Holz-Rau, Christian, 2020. "What's that garage for? Private parking and on-street parking in a high-density urban residential neighbourhood," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    20. Jun-Hyun Kim & Chanam Lee & Wonmin Sohn, 2016. "Urban Natural Environments, Obesity, and Health-Related Quality of Life among Hispanic Children Living in Inner-City Neighborhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:3:p:484-:d:204057. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.