IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i24p5107-d297926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global and Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Models for Modeling PM 2.5 in Heilongjiang, China from 2015 to 2018

Author

Listed:
  • Qingbin Wei

    (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Lianjun Zhang

    (Department of Forest and Natural Resources Management, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, One Forestry Drive, Syracuse, New York, NY 13210, USA)

  • Wenbiao Duan

    (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

  • Zhen Zhen

    (School of Forestry, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
    Key Laboratory of Sustainable Forest Ecosystem Management-Ministry of Education, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China)

Abstract

Objective: This study investigated the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 criteria air pollutants (SO 2 , NO 2 , PM 10 , CO, and O 3 ) in Heilongjiang, China, from 2015 to 2018 using global and geographically and temporally weighted regression models. Methods: Ordinary least squares regression (OLS), linear mixed models (LMM), geographically weighted regression (GWR), temporally weighted regression (TWR), and geographically and temporally weighted regression (GTWR) were applied to model the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 air pollutants. Results: The LMM and all GWR-based models (i.e., GWR, TWR, and GTWR) showed great advantages over OLS in terms of higher model R 2 and more desirable model residuals, especially TWR and GTWR. The GWR, LMM, TWR, and GTWR improved the model explanation power by 3%, 5%, 12%, and 12%, respectively, from the R 2 (0.85) of OLS. TWR yielded slightly better model performance than GTWR and reduced the root mean squared errors (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the model residuals by 67% compared with OLS; while GWR only reduced RMSE and MAE by 15% against OLS. LMM performed slightly better than GWR by accounting for both temporal autocorrelation between observations over time and spatial heterogeneity across the 13 cities under study, which provided an alternative for modeling PM 2.5 . Conclusions: The traditional OLS and GWR are inadequate for describing the non-stationarity of PM 2.5 . The temporal dependence was more important and significant than spatial heterogeneity in our data. Our study provided evidence of spatial–temporal heterogeneity and possible solutions for modeling the relationships between PM 2.5 and 5 criteria air pollutants for Heilongjiang province, China.

Suggested Citation

  • Qingbin Wei & Lianjun Zhang & Wenbiao Duan & Zhen Zhen, 2019. "Global and Geographically and Temporally Weighted Regression Models for Modeling PM 2.5 in Heilongjiang, China from 2015 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-20, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5107-:d:297926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/24/5107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jinhuang Lin & An Zhang & Wenhui Chen & Mingshui Lin, 2018. "Estimates of Daily PM 2.5 Exposure in Beijing Using Spatio-Temporal Kriging Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    2. Orelien, Jean G. & Edwards, Lloyd J., 2008. "Fixed-effect variable selection in linear mixed models using R2 statistics," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 52(4), pages 1896-1907, January.
    3. Byron C. Jaeger & Lloyd J. Edwards & Kalyan Das & Pranab K. Sen, 2017. "An statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1086-1105, April.
    4. Daniela Dias & Oxana Tchepel, 2018. "Spatial and Temporal Dynamics in Air Pollution Exposure Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-23, March.
    5. Jiawei Wu & Yehua Dennis Wei & Qizhai Li & Feng Yuan, 2018. "Economic Transition and Changing Location of Manufacturing Industry in China: A Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-28, July.
    6. Lianfa Li & Jiehao Zhang & Wenyang Qiu & Jinfeng Wang & Ying Fang, 2017. "An Ensemble Spatiotemporal Model for Predicting PM 2.5 Concentrations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    7. Hua Wang & Changwei Tian & Wenming Wang & Xiaoming Luo, 2019. "Temporal Cross-Correlations between Ambient Air Pollutants and Seasonality of Tuberculosis: A Time-Series Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-11, May.
    8. Antonio Páez & Takashi Uchida & Kazuaki Miyamoto, 2002. "A General Framework for Estimation and Inference of Geographically Weighted Regression Models: 1. Location-Specific Kernel Bandwidths and a Test for Locational Heterogeneity," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 34(4), pages 733-754, April.
    9. Dongsheng Zhan & Mei-Po Kwan & Wenzhong Zhang & Shaojian Wang & Jianhui Yu, 2017. "Spatiotemporal Variations and Driving Factors of Air Pollution in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, December.
    10. Feng Xu & Nan Xiang & Yoshiro Higano, 2017. "How to reach haze control targets by air pollutants emission reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region of China?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Gollini, Isabella & Lu, Binbin & Charlton, Martin & Brunsdon, Christopher & Harris, Paul, 2015. "GWmodel: An R Package for Exploring Spatial Heterogeneity Using Geographically Weighted Models," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 63(i17).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Longhui Fu & Qibang Wang & Jianhui Li & Huiran Jin & Zhen Zhen & Qingbin Wei, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Heterogeneity and the Key Influencing Factors of PM 2.5 and PM 10 in Heilongjiang, China from 2014 to 2018," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Alexis Comber & Khanh Chi & Man Q Huy & Quan Nguyen & Binbin Lu & Hoang H Phe & Paul Harris, 2020. "Distance metric choice can both reduce and induce collinearity in geographically weighted regression," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 47(3), pages 489-507, March.
    3. Gainbi Park & Zengwang Xu, 2022. "The constituent components and local indicator variables of social vulnerability index," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(1), pages 95-120, January.
    4. Abdullah Al Saim & Mohamed H. Aly, 2022. "Machine Learning for Modeling Wildfire Susceptibility at the State Level: An Example from Arkansas, USA," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Zaijun Li & Jianquan Cheng & Qiyan Wu, 2016. "Analyzing regional economic development patterns in a fast developing province of China through geographically weighted principal component analysis," Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 233-245, October.
    6. Andréia S. Santos & Lucas Teles Faria & Mara Lúcia M. Lopes & Carlos R. Minussi, 2023. "Power Distribution Systems’ Vulnerability by Regions Caused by Electrical Discharges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    7. Kirtonia, Sajeeb & Sun, Yanshuo, 2022. "Evaluating rail transit's comparative advantages in travel cost and time over taxi with open data in two U.S. cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 75-87.
    8. Alexis Comber & Paul Harris, 2018. "Geographically weighted elastic net logistic regression," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 317-341, October.
    9. Huiwen Gong & Robert Hassink & Cassandra Wang, 2021. "Strategic coupling and regional resilience in times of uncertainty: the industrial chain chief model in Zhejiang, China," PEGIS geo-disc-2021_06, Institute for Economic Geography and GIScience, Department of Socioeconomics, Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    10. Yigong Hu & Binbin Lu & Yong Ge & Guanpeng Dong, 2022. "Uncovering spatial heterogeneity in real estate prices via combined hierarchical linear model and geographically weighted regression," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1715-1740, July.
    11. Wiktor Budziński & Danny Campbell & Mikołaj Czajkowski & Urška Demšar & Nick Hanley, 2018. "Using Geographically Weighted Choice Models to Account for the Spatial Heterogeneity of Preferences," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 69(3), pages 606-626, September.
    12. Byron C. Jaeger & Lloyd J. Edwards & Kalyan Das & Pranab K. Sen, 2017. "An statistic for fixed effects in the generalized linear mixed model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(6), pages 1086-1105, April.
    13. Gianfranco Piras & Mauricio Sarrias, 2023. "Heterogeneous spatial models in R: spatial regimes models," Journal of Spatial Econometrics, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Xuliang Zhang & Xiaohui Hu & Wei Xu, 2020. "Spatio‐temporal dynamics of technical efficiency in China’s specialized markets: A stochastic frontier analysis approach," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(3), pages 1182-1202, September.
    15. Dabao Zhang, 2022. "Coefficients of Determination for Mixed-Effects Models," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 27(4), pages 674-689, December.
    16. Ying Song & Lu Yang & Stavros Sindakis & Sakshi Aggarwal & Charles Chen, 2023. "Analyzing the Role of High-Tech Industrial Agglomeration in Green Transformation and Upgrading of Manufacturing Industry: the Case of China," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 3847-3877, December.
    17. Ulrich Schmoch & Birgit Gehrke, 2022. "China’s technological performance as reflected in patents," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(1), pages 299-317, January.
    18. Minghai Luo & Sixian Qin & Haoxue Chang & Anqi Zhang, 2019. "Disaggregation Method of Carbon Emission: A Case Study in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-17, April.
    19. Yaqiong Wang & Ke Xu & Shaomin Li, 2020. "The Functional Spatio-Temporal Statistical Model with Application to O 3 Pollution in Beijing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-15, May.
    20. Xiaoping Zhou & Zhenyang Qin & Yingjie Zhang & Linyi Zhao & Yan Song, 2019. "Quantitative Estimation and Spatiotemporal Characteristic Analysis of Price Deviation in China's Housing Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    GTWR; GWR; TWR; LMM; PM 2.5 ; air pollutants;
    All these keywords.

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:24:p:5107-:d:297926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.