IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v16y2019i22p4312-d284026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cost-Effectiveness of Using Mass Media to Prevent Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults: The FinishIt Campaign

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth C. Hair

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA
    Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • David R. Holtgrave

    (School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12144, USA)

  • Alexa R. Romberg

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA)

  • Morgane Bennett

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA
    Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA)

  • Jessica M. Rath

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA
    Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA)

  • Megan C. Diaz

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA)

  • Donna M. Vallone

    (Schroeder Institute at Truth Initiative, Washington, DC 20001, USA
    Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
    Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU College of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA)

Abstract

Mass media campaigns have been hailed as some of the most effective tobacco prevention interventions. This study examined the cost-effectiveness of the national tobacco prevention campaign, truth ® FinishIt, to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved and the return on investment (ROI). The cost–utility analysis used four main parameters: program costs, number of smoking careers averted, treatment costs, and number of QALYs saved whenever a smoking career is averted. Parameters were varied to characterize cost-effectiveness under different assumptions (base case, conservative, optimistic, and most optimistic). The ROI estimate compared campaign expenditures to the cost saved due to the campaign implementation. Analyses were conducted in 2019. The base case analysis indicated the campaign results in a societal cost savings of $3.072 billion. Under the most conservative assumptions, estimates indicated the campaign was highly cost-effective at $1076 per QALY saved. The overall ROI estimate was $174 ($144 in costs to smokers, $24 in costs to the smoker’s family, and $7 in costs to society) in cost savings for every $1 spent on the campaign. In all analyses, the FinishIt campaign was found to reach or exceed the threshold levels of cost savings or cost-effectiveness, with a positive ROI. These findings point to the value of this important investment in the health of the younger generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth C. Hair & David R. Holtgrave & Alexa R. Romberg & Morgane Bennett & Jessica M. Rath & Megan C. Diaz & Donna M. Vallone, 2019. "Cost-Effectiveness of Using Mass Media to Prevent Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults: The FinishIt Campaign," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-9, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4312-:d:284026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/22/4312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farrelly, M.C. & Healton, C.G. & Davis, K.C. & Messeri, P. & Hersey, J.C. & Haviland, M.L., 2002. "Getting to the truth: Evaluating national tobacco countermarketing campaigns," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(6), pages 901-907.
    2. Jonathan Gruber & Jonathan Zinman, 2000. "Youth Smoking in the U.S.: Evidence and Implications," NBER Working Papers 7780, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Brian W. Weir & Jennifer Cantrell & David R. Holtgrave & Marisa S. Greenberg & Ryan D. Kennedy & Jessica M. Rath & Elizabeth C. Hair & Donna Vallone, 2018. "Cost and Threshold Analysis of the FinishIt Campaign to Prevent Youth Smoking in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-7, August.
    4. Farrelly, M.C. & Davis, K.C. & Haviland, M.L. & Messeri, P. & Healton, C.G., 2005. "Evidence of a dose-response relationship between "truth" antismoking ads and youth smoking prevalence," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 95(3), pages 425-431.
    5. Donna Vallone & Marisa Greenberg & Haijun Xiao & Morgane Bennett & Jennifer Cantrell & Jessica Rath & Elizabeth Hair, 2017. "The Effect of Branding to Promote Healthy Behavior: Reducing Tobacco Use among Youth and Young Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-13, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alexa R. Romberg & Morgane Bennett & Shreya Tulsiani & Bethany Simard & Jennifer M. Kreslake & Dionisios Favatas & Donna M. Vallone & Elizabeth C. Hair, 2020. "Validating Self-Reported Ad Recall as a Measure of Exposure to Digital Advertising: An Exploratory Analysis Using Ad Tracking Methodology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Anger, Silke & Kvasnicka, Michael & Siedler, Thomas, 2011. "One Last Puff? Public Smoking Bans and Smoking Behavior," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 30(3), pages 591-601.
    3. David Silvera & FRANK R. KARDES & BRUCE E. PFEIFFER & ASHLEY R. ARSENA & R. JUSTIN GOSS, 2013. "Getting consumers to generate their own ad content: The impact of imagine instructions on persuasion," Working Papers 0202mkt, College of Business, University of Texas at San Antonio.
    4. Göhlmann, Silja, 2007. "The Determinants of Smoking Initiation - Empirical Evidence for Germany," Ruhr Economic Papers 27, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    5. Jun Hyun Hwang & Dong-Hee Ryu & Soon-Woo Park, 2020. "Influence of School-Based Smoking Prevention Education on Reducing Gap in Exposure to Anti-Tobacco Media Message among Korean Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-10, November.
    6. Frank A. Sloan & Justin G. Trogdon, 2004. "Litigation and the Political Clout of the Tobacco Companies: Cigarette Taxes, Prices, and the Master Settlement Agreement," School of Economics and Public Policy Working Papers 2004-04, University of Adelaide, School of Economics and Public Policy.
    7. Hong Liu & Wei Tan, 2009. "The Effect of Anti-Smoking Media Campaign on Smoking Behavior: The California Experience," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 10(1), pages 29-47, May.
    8. Chau Quy Ngo & Ryan G. Chiu & Hanh Thi Chu & Giap Van Vu & Quang Nhat Nguyen & Long Hoang Nguyen & Tung Thanh Tran & Cuong Tat Nguyen & Bach Xuan Tran & Carl A. Latkin & Cyrus S.H. Ho & Roger C.M. Ho, 2018. "Correlated Factors with Quitting Attempts Among Male Smokers in Vietnam: A QUITLINE-Based Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Maria L. Loureiro & Anna Sanz-de-Galdeano & Daniela Vuri, 2010. "Smoking Habits: Like Father, Like Son, Like Mother, Like Daughter?," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 72(6), pages 717-743, December.
    10. Dimitris Christelis & Anna Sanz-de-Galdeano, 2009. "Smoking Persistence in Europe: A Semi-Parametric Panel Data Analysis with Selectivity," Working Papers 403, Barcelona School of Economics.
    11. Jessica Liu & Donghee N. Lee & Elise M. Stevens, 2023. "Characteristics Associated with Young Adults’ Intentions to Engage with Anti-Vaping Instagram Posts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Lemarié, Linda & Chebat, Jean-Charles, 2013. "Resist or comply: Promoting responsible gambling among youth," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 137-140.
    13. Kim, Hyunchul & Lee, Dongwon, 2023. "Tax incidence for menthol cigarettes by race: Evidence from Nielsen Homescan data," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    14. Thomas Bauer & Silja Göhlmann & Mathias Sinning, 2007. "Gender differences in smoking behavior," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(9), pages 895-909, September.
    15. Emery, Sherry & White, Martha M. & Pierce, John P., 2001. "Does cigarette price influence adolescent experimentation?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 261-270, March.
    16. Marie A. Bragg & Brian Elbel & Marion Nestle, 2020. "Food Industry Donations to Academic Programs: A Cross-Sectional Examination of the Extent of Publicly Available Data," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    17. Silja Göhlmann & Christoph M. Schmidt & Harald Tauchmann, 2010. "Smoking initiation in Germany: the role of intergenerational transmission," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(2), pages 227-242, February.
    18. David C. Colston & Yanmei Xie & James F. Thrasher & Sherry Emery & Megan E. Patrick & Andrea R. Titus & Michael R. Elliott & Nancy L. Fleischer, 2021. "Exploring How Exposure to Truth and State-Sponsored Anti-Tobacco Media Campaigns Affect Smoking Disparities among Young Adults Using a National Longitudinal Dataset, 2002–2017," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-11, July.
    19. Amy Jordan & Jessica Taylor Piotrowski & Amy Bleakley & Giridhar Mallya, 2012. "Developing Media Interventions to Reduce Household Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 640(1), pages 118-135, March.
    20. Eunsoon Lee & Gyu-il Lee, 2021. "Perceived Exposure and Acceptance Model of Appearance-Related Health Campaigns: Roles of Parents’ Healthy-Appearance Talk, Self-Objectification, and Interpersonal Conversations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:16:y:2019:i:22:p:4312-:d:284026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.