IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i7p1496-d158158.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scale for the Management of Aggressive and Violent Behaviour (C_MAVAS): Psychometric Properties Testing in Mental Health Nurses

Author

Listed:
  • Teris Cheung

    (School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Jolene Mui

    (Castle Peak Hospital, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong, China)

  • Yuen Shan Ho

    (School of Nursing, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China)

  • Wai Tong Chien

    (Nethersole School of Nursing, Chinese University of Hong Kong, China)

Abstract

Background : This study set out to examine the psychometric properties of C_MAVAS, a newly Chinese-translated version of MAVAS, a 27-item scale assessing healthcare professionals’ attitudes to the management of patient violence. Method : The English version of the MAVAS was translated and back-translated to come up with C_MAVAS. A convenience sample of 262 qualified mental health nurses working in a local psychiatric hospital was recruited. Exploratory factor analysis tested C_MAVAS’s construct validity. Results : Content validity of the C_MAVAS was very satisfactory with validity indices of 97.4% for the overall scale and 90% to 100% for individual items. Exploratory factor analysis yielded a four-factor solution: ‘interactional perspectives on patient violence’, ‘best ways perceived for violence management’, ‘internal or biomedical perspectives on patient violence’, and ‘external perspectives on patient aggression and violence’, were important in shaping their attitudes towards managing violence and patient disruptiveness. Internal consistency of the Chinese version was barely satisfactory (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.51–0.67) for the four factors/subscales and its test-retest reliability was good (Pearson’s coefficient = 0.84). Conclusion : The findings suggest the C_MAVAS is a valid and reliable tool to measure mental health nurses’ attitudes towards patient violence/aggression in a mental hospital setting.

Suggested Citation

  • Teris Cheung & Jolene Mui & Yuen Shan Ho & Wai Tong Chien, 2018. "A Scale for the Management of Aggressive and Violent Behaviour (C_MAVAS): Psychometric Properties Testing in Mental Health Nurses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-14, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1496-:d:158158
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Teris Cheung & Paul H. Lee & Paul S. F. Yip, 2017. "Workplace Violence toward Physicians and Nurses: Prevalence and Correlates in Macau," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pei-Yu Wang & Pin-Hui Fang & Chen-Long Wu & Hsiang-Chin Hsu & Chih-Hao Lin, 2019. "Workplace Violence in Asian Emergency Medical Services: A Pilot Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Kinfong Leong & Pedro Fong & Chiufai Kuok & Lirong Meng, 2022. "Cross-Sectional Association and Influencing Factors of Job Satisfaction and Burnout Among Nurses in Macao," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, June.
    3. Kisa Valladão Carvalho & Priscila Norié de Araujo & Felipe Lima dos Santos & Poliana Silva de Oliveira & Janaina Pereira da Silva & Karen da Silva Santos & Angelina Lettiere Viana & Cinira Magali Fort, 2023. "Violence in the Nursing Workplace in the Context of Primary Health Care: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(17), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Yi-Lu Li & Rui-Qi Li & Dan Qiu & Shui-Yuan Xiao, 2020. "Prevalence of Workplace Physical Violence against Health Care Professionals by Patients and Visitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Bing Liu & Naixin Zhu & Huijuan Wang & Fengyu Li & Chenghao Men, 2021. "Protecting Nurses from Mistreatment by Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study on the Roles of Emotional Contagion Susceptibility and Emotional Regulation Ability," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    6. Anja Schablon & Dana Wendeler & Agnessa Kozak & Albert Nienhaus & Susanne Steinke, 2018. "Prevalence and Consequences of Aggression and Violence towards Nursing and Care Staff in Germany—A Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, June.
    7. Cynthia Atamba & John Kipngetich Mosonik & David Stuckler & Lincoln Jisuvei Sungu & Cornelia Melinda Adi Santoso & Halima Habuba Mohamed, 2023. "Impact of Workplace Mistreatment on Employees’ Health and Well-Being in Chinese Firms: A Systematic Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:7:p:1496-:d:158158. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.