IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i1p135-d126958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Positive Survivorship Experiences of Indigenous Australian Cancer Patients

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Tam

    (School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Gail Garvey

    (Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia)

  • Judith Meiklejohn

    (QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia)

  • Jennifer Martin

    (School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
    School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Jon Adams

    (Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia)

  • Euan Walpole

    (Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD 4102, Australia)

  • Michael Fay

    (School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
    Genesis Cancer Care, Newcastle, NSW 2290, Australia)

  • Patricia Valery

    (School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia
    Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT 0811, Australia
    QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia)

Abstract

Amongst Indigenous Australians, “cancer” has negative connotations that detrimentally impact upon access to cancer care services. Barriers to accessing cancer services amongst Indigenous Australians are widely reported. In contrast, factors that facilitate this cohort to successfully navigate cancer care services (“enablers”) are scarcely reported in the literature. Through qualitative interviews, this article examines factors that assist Indigenous Australians to have positive cancer experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with twelve adult Indigenous oncology patients recruited from a tertiary hospital in Queensland, Australia during 2012–2014. Data generated from the interviews were independently reviewed by two researchers via inductive thematic analytical processes. Discussions followed by consensus on the major categories allowed conclusions to be drawn on potential enablers. Two major categories of enablers were identified by the researchers: resilience and communication. Individual’s intrinsic strength, their coping strategies, and receipt of support improved participant’s resilience and consequently supported a positive experience. Communication methods and an effective patient-provider relationship facilitated positive experiences for participants. Despite potential barriers to access of care for Indigenous cancer patients, participants in the study demonstrated that it was still possible to focus on the positive aspects of their cancer experiences. Many participants explained how cancer changed their outlook on life, often for the better, with many feeling empowered as they progressed through their cancer diagnosis and treatment processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Tam & Gail Garvey & Judith Meiklejohn & Jennifer Martin & Jon Adams & Euan Walpole & Michael Fay & Patricia Valery, 2018. "Exploring Positive Survivorship Experiences of Indigenous Australian Cancer Patients," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:135-:d:126958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/1/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John M Kelley & Gordon Kraft-Todd & Lidia Schapira & Joe Kossowsky & Helen Riess, 2014. "The Influence of the Patient-Clinician Relationship on Healthcare Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(4), pages 1-7, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anneliese de Groot & Bena Brown & Daniel Lindsay & Alana Gall & Nicole Hewlett & Amy Hickman & Gail Garvey, 2024. "‘How Your Spirit Is Travelling’—Understanding First Nations Peoples’ Experiences of Living Well with and after Cancer," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen R. Sepucha & Steven J. Atlas & Yuchiao Chang & Andrew Freiberg & Henrik Malchau & Mahima Mangla & Harry Rubash & Leigh H. Simmons & Thomas Cha, 2018. "Informed, Patient-Centered Decisions Associated with Better Health Outcomes in Orthopedics: Prospective Cohort Study," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 38(8), pages 1018-1026, November.
    2. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Tung-Manh Ho & Hong-Kong Nguyen & Thu-Trang Vuong, 2018. "Healthcare consumers’ sensitivity to costs: a reflection on behavioural economics from an emerging market," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ying Lau & Kin Sun Chan, 2018. "Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the fear of intimacy with helping professionals scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-18, May.
    4. Ana Maria Rodriguez & Beth A Lown, 2019. "Measuring compassionate healthcare with the 12-item Schwartz Center Compassionate Care Scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Hardman, Doug & Geraghty, Adam W.A. & Lown, Mark & Bishop, Felicity L., 2020. "Subjunctive medicine: Enacting efficacy in general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    6. Óscar Rodríguez-Nogueira & Jaume Morera Balaguer & Abel Nogueira López & Juan Roldán Merino & José-Martín Botella-Rico & Sonia Del Río-Medina & Antonio R Moreno Poyato, 2020. "The psychometric properties of the person-centered therapeutic relationship in physiotherapy scale," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-16, November.
    7. Francesco Tramonti & Franco Giorgi & Annibale Fanali, 2021. "Systems thinking and the biopsychosocial approach: A multilevel framework for patient‐centred care," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 215-230, March.
    8. Michelle L Dossett & Lin Mu & Roger B Davis & Iris R Bell & Anthony J Lembo & Ted J Kaptchuk & Gloria Y Yeh, 2015. "Patient-Provider Interactions Affect Symptoms in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Pilot Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(9), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Luther, Louisa & Benkenstein, Martin & Rummelhagen, Katja, 2016. "Enhancing patients' hospital satisfaction by taking advantage of interpersonal similarity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 50-58.
    10. Kovacs, Roxanne J. & Lagarde, Mylene & Cairns, John, 2022. "Can patients improve the quality of care they receive? Experimental evidence from Senegal," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    11. Meredith A. Perry & Bernadette Jones & Matthew Jenkins & Hemakumar Devan & Alister Neill & Tristram Ingham, 2023. "Health System Factors Affecting the Experience of Non-Invasive Ventilation Provision of People with Neuromuscular Disorders in New Zealand," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Krunoslav Nikodem & Marko Ćurković & Ana Borovečki, 2022. "Trust in the Healthcare System and Physicians in Croatia: A Survey of the General Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Lazzaro-Salazar, Mariana & Pujol-Cols, Lucas J., 2022. "Instrumentos estandarizados para medir la relación médico-paciente: una revisión sistemática de la literatura internacional e iberoamericana," Nülan. Deposited Documents 3753, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Sociales, Centro de Documentación.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:1:p:135-:d:126958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.