IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v15y2018i10p2254-d175735.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combining AHP-Entropy Approach with GIS for Construction Waste Landfill Selection—A Case Study of Shenzhen

Author

Listed:
  • Zhikun Ding

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Menglian Zhu

    (Financial Investment Management Service Center of Honghuagang District, Zunyi 563100, China)

  • Zezhou Wu

    (Department of Construction Management and Real Estate, College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Yanbin Fu

    (Department of Civil Engineering, College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)

  • Xia Liu

    (Architecture Engineering School, Chongqing Vocational Institute of Engineering, Chongqing, 400037, China)

Abstract

With the recent fast economy development and rapid urbanization, the huge generation of construction waste has become a threat to sustainable development in China. Though efforts have been made to promote reuse and recycling of construction waste, landfilling of waste remains the most commonly adapted approach for construction waste disposal. As the space for landfills is limited and because of the negative issues in terms of environmental and social aspects that may be caused, the appropriate site selection of landfills is crucial. With this background, this paper aims to establish a framework for facilitating landfill selection for construction waste. To begin with, a total of sixteen factors that may influence landfill site selection were identified from a literature review. Then, based on the combined analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and entropy method, the weights and the final comprehensive scores of the identified factors were calculated. According to the derived results, potential sites for landfills were divided into three levels, namely the most appropriate (0.38%), appropriate (17.58%), and inappropriate (82.04%). The proposed decision-making methods in this paper can provide a valuable reference for the selection of construction waste landfill sites.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhikun Ding & Menglian Zhu & Zezhou Wu & Yanbin Fu & Xia Liu, 2018. "Combining AHP-Entropy Approach with GIS for Construction Waste Landfill Selection—A Case Study of Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-21, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2254-:d:175735
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2254/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/10/2254/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Giannikos, Ioannis, 1998. "A multiobjective programming model for locating treatment sites and routing hazardous wastes," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 104(2), pages 333-342, January.
    2. Libiao Bai & Hailing Wang & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang, 2018. "An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Sapfo Τsolaki-Fiaka & George D. Bathrellos & Hariklia D. Skilodimou, 2018. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for an Abandoned Quarry in the Evros Region (NE Greece)," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-16, April.
    4. Saaty, Thomas L., 1990. "How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 9-26, September.
    5. Ying Zhao & Qiang Xue & Lei Liu, 2012. "A Coupling Kinetics Model for Pollutant Release and Transport in the Process of Landfill Settlement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Tam, Maggie C. Y. & Tummala, V. M. Rao, 2001. "An application of the AHP in vendor selection of a telecommunications system," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 171-182, April.
    7. Yuyu Chen & Bangyi Li & Qingguo Bai & Zhi Liu, 2018. "Decision-Making and Environmental Implications under Cap-and-Trade and Take-Back Regulations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, April.
    8. Xudong Chen & Zhongwen Xu & Liming Yao & Ning Ma, 2018. "Processing Technology Selection for Municipal Sewage Treatment Based on a Multi-Objective Decision Model under Uncertainty," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Huifang Sun & Yaoguo Dang & Wenxin Mao, 2018. "A Decision-Making Method with Grey Multi-Source Heterogeneous Data and Its Application in Green Supplier Selection," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-24, March.
    10. Ping Lu & Xuan Yang & Zhou-Jing Wang, 2018. "Fuzzy Group Consensus Decision Making and Its Use in Selecting Energy-Saving and Low-Carbon Technology Schemes in Star Hotels," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Çetinkaya, Cihan & Erbaş, Mehmet & Kabak, Mehmet & Özceylan, Eren, 2023. "A mass vaccination site selection problem: An application of GIS and entropy-based MAUT approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Hamid Reza Fazeli & Qingjin Peng, 2023. "Integrated approaches of BWM-QFD and FUCOM-QFD for improving weighting solution of design matrix," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 1003-1020, March.
    3. Yen-Chieh Chen & Hsiao-Li Yao & Shou-Der Weng & Yang-Fei Tai, 2022. "An Analysis of the Optimal Facility Location of Tourism Industry in Plain Region by Utilizing GIS," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    4. Moghaddam, Hossein Azizi & Shorabeh, Saman Nadizadeh, 2022. "Designing and implementing a location-based model to identify areas suitable for multi-renewable energy development for supplying electricity to agricultural wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1251-1264.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wenshuai Wu & Gang Kou, 2016. "A group consensus model for evaluating real estate investment alternatives," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 2(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Libiao Bai & Hailing Wang & Ning Huang & Qiang Du & Youdan Huang, 2018. "An Environmental Management Maturity Model of Construction Programs Using the AHP-Entropy Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Ning Zhang & Zaiwu Gong & Kedong Yin & Yuhong Wang, 2018. "Special Issue “Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, May.
    4. Hariklia D. Skilodimou & George D. Bathrellos & Dimitrios E. Alexakis, 2021. "Flood Hazard Assessment Mapping in Burned and Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Flavio Martins & Maria Fatima Almeida & Rodrigo Calili & Agatha Oliveira, 2020. "Design Thinking Applied to Smart Home Projects: A User-Centric and Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-27, December.
    6. Jochen Wulf, 2020. "Development of an AHP hierarchy for managing omnichannel capabilities: a design science research approach," Business Research, Springer;German Academic Association for Business Research, vol. 13(1), pages 39-68, April.
    7. Wu, Zhangsheng & Li, Yue & Wang, Rong & Xu, Xu & Ren, Dongyang & Huang, Quanzhong & Xiong, Yunwu & Huang, Guanhua, 2023. "Evaluation of irrigation water saving and salinity control practices of maize and sunflower in the upper Yellow River basin with an agro-hydrological model based method," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    8. D’Inverno, Giovanna & Carosi, Laura & Romano, Giulia & Guerrini, Andrea, 2018. "Water pollution in wastewater treatment plants: An efficiency analysis with undesirable output," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 24-34.
    9. Nermin Kişi, 2019. "A Strategic Approach to Sustainable Tourism Development Using the A’WOT Hybrid Method: A Case Study of Zonguldak, Turkey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, February.
    10. Pathiraja, Erandathie & Griffith, Garry & Farquharson, Robert & Faggia, Rob, 2019. "The Cost of Climate Change to Agricultural Industries: Coconuts in Sri Lanka," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 10(05), December.
    11. Ayodele, T.R. & Ogunjuyigbe, A.S.O. & Odigie, O. & Munda, J.L., 2018. "A multi-criteria GIS based model for wind farm site selection using interval type-2 fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: The case study of Nigeria," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1853-1869.
    12. V. Srinivasan & G. Shainesh & Anand K. Sharma, 2015. "An approach to prioritize customer-based, cost-effective service enhancements," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(14), pages 747-762, October.
    13. Patricija Bajec & Danijela Tuljak-Suban, 2019. "An Integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process—Slack Based Measure-Data Envelopment Analysis Model for Evaluating the Efficiency of Logistics Service Providers Considering Undesirable Performance Criteria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    14. Abareshi, Maryam & Zaferanieh, Mehdi, 2019. "A bi-level capacitated P-median facility location problem with the most likely allocation solution," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-20.
    15. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Wenjuan Liu & Sinta Sulistyo & Philippe LeBillon & Je'anne Wegner, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability impacts of critical mineral extractions: Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment and SDGs frameworks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 746-759, June.
    16. Xinxin Liu & Xiaosheng Wang & Haiying Guo & Xiaojie An, 2021. "Benefit Allocation in Shared Water-Saving Management Contract Projects Based on Modified Expected Shapley Value," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(1), pages 39-62, January.
    17. Sushil, 2019. "Efficient interpretive ranking process incorporating implicit and transitive dominance relationships," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 283(1), pages 1489-1516, December.
    18. Kokaraki, Nikoleta & Hopfe, Christina J. & Robinson, Elaine & Nikolaidou, Elli, 2019. "Testing the reliability of deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods using building performance simulation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 991-1007.
    19. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    20. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:15:y:2018:i:10:p:2254-:d:175735. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.