IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i12p1526-d121958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Robin

    (Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
    NIHR Health Protection Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Ronald Ross Building, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK)

  • Elizabeth Perkins

    (NIHR Health Protection Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Ronald Ross Building, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
    Health Services Research Department, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK)

  • Francine Watkins

    (NIHR Health Protection Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Ronald Ross Building, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
    Department of Public Health & Policy, Institute of Psychology Health and Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK)

  • Robert Christley

    (Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, School of Veterinary Science, University of Liverpool, Leahurst Campus, Neston CH64 7TE, UK
    NIHR Health Protection Research Unit, University of Liverpool, Ronald Ross Building, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK)

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, following the emergence of Seoul hantavirus in pet rat owners in 2012, public health authorities tried to communicate the risk of this zoonotic disease, but had limited success. To explore this lack of engagement with health advice, we conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with pet rat owners and analysed them using a grounded theory approach. The findings from these interviews suggest that rat owners construct their pets as different from wild rats, and by elevating the rat to the status of a pet, the powerful associations that rats have with dirt and disease are removed. Removing the rat from the contaminated outside world moves their pet rat from being ‘out of place’ to ‘in place’. A concept of ‘bounded purity’ keeps the rat protected within the home, allowing owners to interact with their pet, safe in the knowledge that it is clean and disease-free. Additionally, owners constructed a ‘hierarchy of purity’ for their pets, and it is on this structure of disease and risk that owners base their behaviour, not conventional biomedical models of disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Robin & Elizabeth Perkins & Francine Watkins & Robert Christley, 2017. "Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:12:p:1526-:d:121958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/12/1526/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/12/1526/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Green, 2004. "Book Review: Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(4), pages 108-109, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faith Osasumwen Olanrewaju & Adekunle Olanrewaju & Femi Omotoso & Joshua Olaniyi Alabi & Emmanuel Amoo & Ejiroghene Loromeke & Lady Adaina Ajayi, 2019. "Insurgency and the Invisible Displaced Population in Nigeria: A Situational Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    2. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    3. Thomas Reindersma & Isabelle Fabbricotti & Kees Ahaus & Sandra Sülz, 2022. "Integrated Payment, Fragmented Realities? A Discourse Analysis of Integrated Payment in the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Aicha Boukthir & Jihene Bettaieb & Astrid C Erber & Hind Bouguerra & Rym Mallekh & Ikbel Naouar & Adel Gharbi & Manal Alghamdi & Emma Plugge & Piero Olliaro & Afif Ben Salah, 2020. "Psycho-social impacts, experiences and perspectives of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis regarding treatment options and case management: An exploratory qualitative study in Tunisia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Sara C. Owczarczak-Garstecka & Robert M. Christley & Francine Watkins & Huadong Yang & Carri Westgarth, 2021. "“ If You Don’t See the Dog, What Can You Do?” Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
    6. Ngwira, Chikosa & Mayhew, Susannah H. & Hutchinson, Eleanor, 2021. "Community-level integration of health services and community health workers’ agency in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    7. Pauline Katharina Mantell & Annika Baumeister & Stephan Ruhrmann & Anna Janhsen & Christiane Woopen, 2021. "Attitudes towards Risk Prediction in a Help Seeking Population of Early Detection Centers for Mental Disorders—A Qualitative Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Häggström, Felix & Borsch, Anne Sofie & Skovdal, Morten, 2020. "Caring alone: The boundaries of teachers' ethics of care for newly arrived immigrant and refugee learners in Denmark," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Theriault, Veronique & Kirimi, Lilian & Wineman, Ayala & Kinyumu, Ephiphania & Tschirley, David, 2022. "Assessment of the Policy Enabling Environment for Large-Scale Food Fortification (LSFF) —With an Application to Kenya—," PRCI Research Papers 330121, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Food Security Group.
    10. Molefi Motsoeneng, 2021. "The silent voices of the migrant domestic workers in the South African metropolitan: An exploratory study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 807-818, November.
    11. Guldbrandsson, Karin & Bremberg, Sven, 2020. "Cross-sectoral cooperation at the ministerial level in three Nordic countries - With a focus on health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    12. Mathew Carter & Colleen Fisher & Mohan Isaac, 2013. "Recovery From Comorbidity," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    13. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Talent Conceptualisation and Talent Management Practices within the Banking Sector in Vietnam," OSF Preprints y6r4q, Center for Open Science.
    14. Joshua Mugambwa & George William Mugerwa & Wilson Williams Mutumba & Claire Muganzi & Bridget Namubiru & Yusuf Waswa & Isaac Newton Kayongo, 2016. "Privately Provided Accommodation Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    15. Remar A. Mangaoil & Kristin Cleverley & Elizabeth Peter, 2020. "Immediate Staff Debriefing Following Seclusion or Restraint Use in Inpatient Mental Health Settings: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 479-495, September.
    16. Muhammad Atif & Dr. Naila Nazir, 2023. "Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Services Tax Collection in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 701-708.
    17. T. A. Allo & P. A. Edewor & D. Imhonopi, 2019. "Assessment of Perceived Risks of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women in Five Selected Local Governments in Ogun State, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    18. Joe Antoun & Daniel J. Brown & Daniel J. W. Jones & Nicholas C. Sangala & Robert J. Lewis & Anthony I. Shepherd & Melitta A. McNarry & Kelly A. Mackintosh & Laura Mason & Jo Corbett & Zoe L. Saynor, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Initial COVID-19 Restrictions on Physical Activity, Wellbeing and Quality of Life in Shielding Adults with End-Stage Renal Disease in the United Kingdom Dialysing at Home v," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.
    19. Josefine Hansson & Bodil J Landstad & Stig Vinberg & Marianne Hedlund & Åsa Tjulin, 2022. "Small business managers and Covid-19—The role of a sense of coherence and general resistance resources in coping with stressors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Nayreen Daruwalla & Shruti Chakravarty & Sangeeta Chatterji & Neena Shah More & Glyn Alcock & Sarah Hawkes & David Osrin, 2013. "Violence Against Women With Disability in Mumbai, India," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440134, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:12:p:1526-:d:121958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.