IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7377-d591821.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

“ If You Don’t See the Dog, What Can You Do?” Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Sara C. Owczarczak-Garstecka

    (Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
    Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Chadwick Building, Peach Street, Liverpool L7 7BD, UK
    Dogs Trust, Canine Behaviour and Research Team, 17 Wakley Street, London EC1V 7RQ, UK)

  • Robert M. Christley

    (Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
    Dogs Trust, Canine Behaviour and Research Team, 17 Wakley Street, London EC1V 7RQ, UK)

  • Francine Watkins

    (Public Health, Policy & Systems, Institute of Population Health, University of Liverpool, Waterhouse Building, Block B, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GL, UK)

  • Huadong Yang

    (Management School, University of Liverpool, Chatham Street, Liverpool L69 7ZH, UK)

  • Carri Westgarth

    (Department of Livestock and One Health, Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool, 8 West Derby Street, Liverpool L69 7BE, UK
    Institute for Risk and Uncertainty, University of Liverpool, Chadwick Building, Peach Street, Liverpool L7 7BD, UK)

Abstract

Dog bites are a health risk in a number of workplaces such as the delivery, veterinary and dog rescue sectors. This study aimed to explore how workers negotiate the risk of dog bites in daily interactions with dogs and the role of procedures in workplace safety. Participants who encounter dogs at work were recruited using snowball sampling. Ethnographic methods (interviews, focus group discussions, participant-observations) were used for data collection. All data were coded qualitatively into themes. Six themes describing dog bite risk management were identified: ‘Surveillance of dogs’; ‘Communicating risk; ‘Actions taken to manage perceived risk’; ‘Reporting bites and near-misses’, ‘Investigating bites and near-misses’, and; ‘Learning and teaching safety’. While the procedures described dog bite risk as objective, when interacting with dogs, participants drew on experiential knowledge and subjective judgment of risk. There was a discrepancy between risks that the procedures aimed to guard against and the risk participants were experiencing in the course of work. This often led to disregarding procedures. Paradoxically, procedures generated risks to individual wellbeing and sometimes employment, by contributing to blaming employees for bites. Dog bite prevention could be improved by clarifying definitions of bites, involving at risk staff in procedure development, and avoiding blaming the victim for the incident.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara C. Owczarczak-Garstecka & Robert M. Christley & Francine Watkins & Huadong Yang & Carri Westgarth, 2021. "“ If You Don’t See the Dog, What Can You Do?” Using Procedures to Negotiate the Risk of Dog Bites in Occupational Contexts," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-20, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7377-:d:591821
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7377/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7377/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Judith Green, 2004. "Book Review: Qualitative Methods and Health Policy Research," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 9(4), pages 108-109, November.
    2. Finn Nilson & John Damsager & Jens Lauritsen & Carl Bonander, 2018. "The effect of breed-specific dog legislation on hospital treated dog bites in Odense, Denmark—A time series intervention study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-8, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Faith Osasumwen Olanrewaju & Adekunle Olanrewaju & Femi Omotoso & Joshua Olaniyi Alabi & Emmanuel Amoo & Ejiroghene Loromeke & Lady Adaina Ajayi, 2019. "Insurgency and the Invisible Displaced Population in Nigeria: A Situational Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    2. Francesca Gennari, 2023. "The transition towards a circular economy. A framework for SMEs," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 27(4), pages 1423-1457, December.
    3. Thomas Reindersma & Isabelle Fabbricotti & Kees Ahaus & Sandra Sülz, 2022. "Integrated Payment, Fragmented Realities? A Discourse Analysis of Integrated Payment in the Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-14, July.
    4. Aicha Boukthir & Jihene Bettaieb & Astrid C Erber & Hind Bouguerra & Rym Mallekh & Ikbel Naouar & Adel Gharbi & Manal Alghamdi & Emma Plugge & Piero Olliaro & Afif Ben Salah, 2020. "Psycho-social impacts, experiences and perspectives of patients with Cutaneous Leishmaniasis regarding treatment options and case management: An exploratory qualitative study in Tunisia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(12), pages 1-16, December.
    5. Ngwira, Chikosa & Mayhew, Susannah H. & Hutchinson, Eleanor, 2021. "Community-level integration of health services and community health workers’ agency in Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    6. Charlotte Robin & Elizabeth Perkins & Francine Watkins & Robert Christley, 2017. "Pets, Purity and Pollution: Why Conventional Models of Disease Transmission Do Not Work for Pet Rat Owners," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Pauline Katharina Mantell & Annika Baumeister & Stephan Ruhrmann & Anna Janhsen & Christiane Woopen, 2021. "Attitudes towards Risk Prediction in a Help Seeking Population of Early Detection Centers for Mental Disorders—A Qualitative Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-13, January.
    8. Häggström, Felix & Borsch, Anne Sofie & Skovdal, Morten, 2020. "Caring alone: The boundaries of teachers' ethics of care for newly arrived immigrant and refugee learners in Denmark," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Theriault, Veronique & Kirimi, Lilian & Wineman, Ayala & Kinyumu, Ephiphania & Tschirley, David, 2022. "Assessment of the Policy Enabling Environment for Large-Scale Food Fortification (LSFF) —With an Application to Kenya—," PRCI Research Papers 330121, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food and Resource Economics, Food Security Group.
    10. Lori R. Kogan & Wendy Packman & Phyllis Erdman & Jennifer Currin-McCulloch & Cori Bussolari, 2022. "US Adults’ Perceptions of Dog Breed Bans, Dog Aggression and Breed-Specific Laws," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Molefi Motsoeneng, 2021. "The silent voices of the migrant domestic workers in the South African metropolitan: An exploratory study," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 25(1), pages 807-818, November.
    12. Guldbrandsson, Karin & Bremberg, Sven, 2020. "Cross-sectoral cooperation at the ministerial level in three Nordic countries - With a focus on health inequalities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    13. Mathew Carter & Colleen Fisher & Mohan Isaac, 2013. "Recovery From Comorbidity," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(4), pages 21582440135, November.
    14. Lori R. Kogan & Regina M. Schoenfeld-Tacher & Peter W. Hellyer & James A. Oxley & Mark Rishniw, 2019. "Small Animal Veterinarians’ Perceptions, Experiences, and Views of Common Dog Breeds, Dog Aggression, and Breed-Specific Laws in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-15, October.
    15. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2021. "Talent Conceptualisation and Talent Management Practices within the Banking Sector in Vietnam," OSF Preprints y6r4q, Center for Open Science.
    16. Joshua Mugambwa & George William Mugerwa & Wilson Williams Mutumba & Claire Muganzi & Bridget Namubiru & Yusuf Waswa & Isaac Newton Kayongo, 2016. "Privately Provided Accommodation Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(2), pages 21582440166, April.
    17. Remar A. Mangaoil & Kristin Cleverley & Elizabeth Peter, 2020. "Immediate Staff Debriefing Following Seclusion or Restraint Use in Inpatient Mental Health Settings: A Scoping Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 29(7), pages 479-495, September.
    18. Muhammad Atif & Dr. Naila Nazir, 2023. "Impact of Fiscal Decentralization on Services Tax Collection in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 701-708.
    19. T. A. Allo & P. A. Edewor & D. Imhonopi, 2019. "Assessment of Perceived Risks of Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Screening Among Women in Five Selected Local Governments in Ogun State, Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(2), pages 21582440198, April.
    20. Joe Antoun & Daniel J. Brown & Daniel J. W. Jones & Nicholas C. Sangala & Robert J. Lewis & Anthony I. Shepherd & Melitta A. McNarry & Kelly A. Mackintosh & Laura Mason & Jo Corbett & Zoe L. Saynor, 2021. "Understanding the Impact of Initial COVID-19 Restrictions on Physical Activity, Wellbeing and Quality of Life in Shielding Adults with End-Stage Renal Disease in the United Kingdom Dialysing at Home v," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7377-:d:591821. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.