IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i11p1361-d118066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Development and Relative Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Intakes of Total and Free Sugars in Australian Toddlers

Author

Listed:
  • Gemma Devenish

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia)

  • Aqif Mukhtar

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia)

  • Andrea Begley

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia)

  • Loc Do

    (Australian Research Centre for Population Oral Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5000, Australia)

  • Jane Scott

    (School of Public Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia)

Abstract

Background : Dental research into early childhood caries is hindered by a lack of suitable dietary assessment tools that have been developed and validated for the population and outcomes of interest. The aim of this study was to develop and investigate the relative validity and reproducibility of the Study of Mothers’ and Infants’ Life Events Food Frequency Questionnaire (SMILE-FFQ), to assess the total and free sugars intakes of Australian toddlers. Methods : The SMILE-FFQ was designed to capture the leading dietary contributors to dental caries risk in toddlers aged 18–30 months via a proxy report. Ninety-five parents of Australian toddlers completed the questionnaire online before and after providing three 24-h recalls (24HR), collected on non-consecutive days using the multipass method. Total and free sugars were compared between the two SMILE-FFQ administrations and between each SMILE-FFQ and the 24HR using multiple statistical tests and standardised validity criteria. Correlation (Pearson), mean difference (Wilcoxon rank test) and Bland Altman analyses were conducted to compare absolute values, with cross-classification (Chi-Square and Weighted Kappa) used to compare agreement across tertiles. Results : All reproducibility tests showed good agreement except weighted kappa, which showed acceptable agreement. Relative validity tests revealed a mix of good and acceptable agreement, with total sugars performing better at the individual level than free sugars. Compared to the 24HR, the SMILE-FFQ tended to underestimate absolute values at lower levels and overestimate them at higher levels. Conclusions : The combined findings of the various tests indicate that the SMILE-FFQ performs comparably to the 24HR for assessing both total and free sugars among individuals, is most effective for ranking participants rather than determining absolute intakes, and is therefore suitable for use in observational studies of Australian toddlers.

Suggested Citation

  • Gemma Devenish & Aqif Mukhtar & Andrea Begley & Loc Do & Jane Scott, 2017. "Development and Relative Validity of a Food Frequency Questionnaire to Assess Intakes of Total and Free Sugars in Australian Toddlers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1361-:d:118066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1361/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/11/1361/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Inge Huybrechts & Guy De Backer & Dirk De Bacquer & Lea Maes & Stefaan De Henauw, 2009. "Relative Validity and Reproducibility of a Food-Frequency Questionnaire for Estimating Food Intakes among Flemish Preschoolers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miaobing Zheng & Mihiri Silva & Stephanie Heitkonig & Gavin Abbott & Sarah A. McNaughton & Karen J. Campbell, 2023. "Evaluation of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Capturing Free Sugars Intake in Australian Young Children: The InFANT FFQ," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-9, January.
    2. Lucinda K. Bell & Huy V. Nguyen & Diep H. Ha & Gemma Devenish-Coleman & Rebecca K. Golley & Loc G. Do & Jane A. Scott, 2024. "Predictors of Free Sugars Intake Trajectories across Early Childhood—Results from the SMILE Birth Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(2), pages 1-10, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yatiman Noor Hafizah & Lee Choo Ang & Fendy Yap & Wan Nurul Najwa & Whye Lian Cheah & Abd Talib Ruzita & Farra Aidah Jumuddin & Denise Koh & Julia Ai Cheng Lee & Cecilia A. Essau & Sue Reeves & Caroly, 2019. "Validity and Reliability of a Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to Assess Dietary Intake of Preschool Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-11, November.
    2. Khorramrouz, Fatemeh & Khosravi, Maryam & Eslami, Kazem & Khadem-Rezaiyan, Majid, 2024. "Developing and evaluating the validity and reliability of the Iranian preschool food frequency questionnaire (IP-FFQ)," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Dominika Głąbska & Aneta Książek & Dominika Guzek, 2017. "Development and Validation of the Brief Folate-Specific Food Frequency Questionnaire for Young Women’s Diet Assessment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:11:p:1361-:d:118066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.