IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v14y2017i10p1219-d114959.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Regional Sustainable Development Analysis Based on Information Entropy—Sichuan Province as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Xuedong Liang

    (School of Economics, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Dongyang Si

    (The Economy and Enterprise Development Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

  • Xinli Zhang

    (The Economy and Enterprise Development Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610065, China)

Abstract

According to the implementation of a scientific development perspective, sustainable development needs to consider regional development, economic and social development, and the harmonious development of society and nature, but regional sustainable development is often difficult to quantify. Through an analysis of the structure and functions of a regional system, this paper establishes an evaluation index system, which includes an economic subsystem, an ecological environmental subsystem and a social subsystem, to study regional sustainable development capacity. A sustainable development capacity measure model for Sichuan Province was established by applying the information entropy calculation principle and the Brusselator principle. Each subsystem and entropy change in a calendar year in Sichuan Province were analyzed to evaluate Sichuan Province’s sustainable development capacity. It was found that the established model could effectively show actual changes in sustainable development levels through the entropy change reaction system, at the same time this model could clearly demonstrate how those forty-six indicators from the three subsystems impact on the regional sustainable development, which could make up for the lack of sustainable development research.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuedong Liang & Dongyang Si & Xinli Zhang, 2017. "Regional Sustainable Development Analysis Based on Information Entropy—Sichuan Province as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1219-:d:114959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1219/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/14/10/1219/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bohringer, Christoph & Jochem, Patrick E.P., 2007. "Measuring the immeasurable -- A survey of sustainability indices," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 1-8, June.
    2. Xuefeng Xie & Lijie Pu, 2017. "Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on Matter Element Analysis: A Case Study of 13 Cities in Jiangsu Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Li Shen & Jared M. Kyllo & Xulin Guo, 2013. "An Integrated Model Based on a Hierarchical Indices System for Monitoring and Evaluating Urban Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-36, February.
    4. Haiyan Zhang & Michinori Uwasu & Keishiro Hara & Helmut Yabar, 2011. "Sustainable Urban Development and Land Use Change—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(7), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Fang Yang & Shiying Pan & Xin Yao, 2016. "Regional Convergence and Sustainable Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Tianbao Qin, 2014. "Challenges for Sustainable Development and Its Legal Response in China: A Perspective for Social Transformation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-32, August.
    7. Jian Wu & Guangdong Wu & Qing Zhou & Mi Li, 2014. "Spatial Variation of Regional Sustainable Development and its Relationship to the Allocation of Science and Technology Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, September.
    8. Jeffrey M. Berry & Kent E. Portney, 2013. "Sustainability and Interest Group Participation in City Politics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 5(5), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ning Zhang & Zaiwu Gong & Kedong Yin & Yuhong Wang, 2018. "Special Issue “Decision Models in Green Growth and Sustainable Development”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-8, May.
    2. Kaile Wang & Yunwei Chen, 2025. "An Evaluation and Correlation Analysis of Regional Development Under the Background of Chinese-Style Modernization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Fengfan Han & Anqi Ren & Jinxin Liu & Lixingbo Yu & Fei Jia & Haochen Hou & Ying Liu, 2024. "Towards Sustainable Industry: A Comprehensive Review of Energy–Economy–Environment System Analysis and Future Trends," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Zifeng Liang & Manli Zhang & Qingduo Mao & Bingxin Yu & Ben Ma, 2018. "Improvement of Eco-Efficiency in China: A Comparison of Mandatory and Hybrid Environmental Policy Instruments," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuedong Liang & Weiwei Zhang & Lei Chen & Fumin Deng, 2016. "Sustainable Urban Development Capacity Measure—A Case Study in Jiangsu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-13, March.
    2. Anibal Gusso & Cristina Cafruni & Fabiane Bordin & Mauricio Roberto Veronez & Leticia Lenz & Sabrina Crija, 2015. "Multi-Temporal Patterns of Urban Heat Island as Response to Economic Growth Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Dukhabandhu Sahoo & Diptimayee Mishra & Auro Kumar Sahoo & Phendulwa Zikhona Makunga & Jayanti Behera, 2020. "Regional and subregional analyses of macroeconomic policy strategies for growth and equality in Southern Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2020-176, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    4. Yongrok Choi & Malin Song & Seunghwan Myeong, 2016. "Introduction to the Special Issue on the Sustainable Asia Conference 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, March.
    5. Daniela Cristina Momete & Manuel Mihail Momete, 2021. "Map and Track the Performance in Education for Sustainable Development across the European Union," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Duck Bong Kim, 2019. "An approach for composing predictive models from disparate knowledge sources in smart manufacturing environments," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1999-2012, April.
    7. Zhicheng Lai & Lei Li & Zhuomin Tao & Tao Li & Xiaoting Shi & Jialing Li & Xin Li, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of Ecological Well-Being Performance from the Perspective of Strong Sustainability: A Case Study of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    8. Svatava Janoušková & Tomáš Hák & Bedřich Moldan, 2018. "Global SDGs Assessments: Helping or Confusing Indicators?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Ernest Reig‐Martínez & José A. Gómez‐Limón & Andrés J. Picazo‐Tadeo, 2011. "Ranking farms with a composite indicator of sustainability," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 42(5), pages 561-575, September.
    10. Kajsa Borgnäs, 2017. "Indicators as ‘circular argumentation constructs’? An input–output analysis of the variable structure of five environmental sustainability country rankings," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 769-790, June.
    11. Shelby D. Hunt, 2017. "Strategic marketing, sustainability, the triple bottom line, and resource-advantage (R-A) theory: Securing the foundations of strategic marketing theory and research," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 7(1), pages 52-66, June.
    12. Rickels, Wilfried & Weigand, Christian & Grasse, Patricia & Schmidt, Jörn Oliver & Voss, Rüdiger, 2018. "Does the European Union achieve comprehensive blue growth? Progress of EU coastal states in the Baltic and North Sea, and the Atlantic Ocean against sustainable development Goal 14," Kiel Working Papers 2112, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    13. Becken, S. & Simmons, D., 2008. "Using the concept of yield to assess the sustainability of different tourist types," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 420-429, October.
    14. Richard R. Shaker & Joseph Aversa & Victoria Papp & Bryant M. Serre & Brian R. Mackay, 2020. "Showcasing Relationships between Neighborhood Design and Wellbeing Toronto Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, January.
    15. Zhou, P. & Wang, M., 2016. "Carbon dioxide emissions allocation: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 47-59.
    16. Francis Rathinam & Sayak Khatua & Zeba Siddiqui & Manya Malik & Pallavi Duggal & Samantha Watson & Xavier Vollenweider, 2021. "Using big data for evaluating development outcomes: A systematic map," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(3), September.
    17. Böhringer, Christoph & Bortolamedi, Markus, 2015. "Sense and no(n)-sense of energy security indicators," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 359-371.
    18. Falko Leukhardt & Simon Allen, 2013. "How environmentally focused is the German sustainability strategy? A critical discussion of the indicators used to measure sustainable development in Germany," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 149-166, February.
    19. Pietro Lanzini & Andrea Stocchetti, 2017. "The evolution of the conceptual basis for the assessment of urban mobility sustainability impacts," Working Papers 02, Venice School of Management - Department of Management, Università Ca' Foscari Venezia.
    20. Abdulaziz Aldegheishem, 2024. "Assessing progress towards smart governance in Saudi Arabia," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-9, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:14:y:2017:i:10:p:1219-:d:114959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.