IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2014i9p6400-6417d40260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Variation of Regional Sustainable Development and its Relationship to the Allocation of Science and Technology Resources

Author

Listed:
  • Jian Wu

    (School of Management, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Xiasha, Jianggan District, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Guangdong Wu

    (School of Tourism and Urban Management, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Qing Zhou

    (School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100022, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Mi Li

    (College of Electro-mechanics Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314000, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

With the increasing of labor salaries, the RMB exchange rate, resource product prices and requirements of environmental protection, inexpensive labor and land are no longer the decisive factor of regional competitiveness. From this perspective, China needs to shift from the extensive development mode to the sustainable development mode. Science and technology resources rational allocation is one of the key issues in sustainable development. Based on the counties (districts) data of Zhejiang Province in China, this paper portrays the spatial variation of regional sustainable development level of this area. This paper finds that counties tend to cluster in groups with the same sustainable development level, and this agglomeration trend has been enforced during the past several years. It then testifies to the relationship between the allocation of science and technology resources and local sustainable development, identifies science and technology human resources, financial resources and environmental resource are positively related to local sustainable development, except government financial support. The economic level has a negative relationship with regional sustainable development. This is because the development of the Zhejiang economy grown at the expense of the environment and ecosystem. Some advice is given according to the empirical analysis result.

Suggested Citation

  • Jian Wu & Guangdong Wu & Qing Zhou & Mi Li, 2014. "Spatial Variation of Regional Sustainable Development and its Relationship to the Allocation of Science and Technology Resources," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(9), pages 1-18, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:9:p:6400-6417:d:40260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/6400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/9/6400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cairns, Robert D. & Martinet, Vincent, 2014. "An environmental-economic measure of sustainable development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 4-17.
    2. Schilling, Markus & Chiang, Lichun, 2011. "The effect of natural resources on a sustainable development policy: The approach of non-sustainable externalities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 990-998, February.
    3. Szymanska, Daniela & Chodkowska-Miszczuk, Justyna, 2011. "Endogenous resources utilization of rural areas in shaping sustainable development in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 1497-1501, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sangsung Park & Seung-Joo Lee & Sunghae Jun, 2015. "A Network Analysis Model for Selecting Sustainable Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-16, September.
    2. Kyung-Young Lee, 2021. "Relationship between Public Service Satisfaction and Intention of Continuous Residence of Younger Generations in Rural Areas: The Case of Jeonbuk, Korea," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Sheng Zhang & Meng Xu & Yifu Yang & Zeyu Song, 2021. "Technological Innovation, Production Efficiency, and Sustainable Development: A Case Study from Shenzhen in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-12, September.
    4. Lu Zhang & Xiaochao Guo & Zhimei Lei & Ming K. Lim, 2019. "Social Network Analysis of Sustainable Human Resource Management from the Employee Training’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-20, January.
    5. Sungchul Kim & Dongsik Jang & Sunghae Jun & Sangsung Park, 2015. "A Novel Forecasting Methodology for Sustainable Management of Defense Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Xuedong Liang & Dongyang Si & Xinli Zhang, 2017. "Regional Sustainable Development Analysis Based on Information Entropy—Sichuan Province as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cairns, Robert D. & Del Campo, Stellio & Martinet, Vincent, 2019. "Sustainability of an economy relying on two reproducible assets," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 145-160.
    2. Cairns, Robert D. & Martinet, Vincent, 2021. "Growth and long-run sustainability," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 26(4), pages 381-402, August.
    3. Ortega, Margarita & del Río, Pablo & Montero, Eduardo A., 2013. "Assessing the benefits and costs of renewable electricity. The Spanish case," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 294-304.
    4. Hussain, C.M. Iftekhar & Norton, Brian & Duffy, Aidan, 2017. "Technological assessment of different solar-biomass systems for hybrid power generation in Europe," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1115-1129.
    5. Aldona Standar & Agnieszka Kozera & Łukasz Satoła, 2021. "The Importance of Local Investments Co-Financed by the European Union in the Field of Renewable Energy Sources in Rural Areas of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, January.
    6. Fleurbaey, Marc, 2015. "On sustainability and social welfare," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 34-53.
    7. Siddharth Shankar Rai & Shivam Rai & Nitin Kumar Singh, 2021. "Organizational resilience and social-economic sustainability: COVID-19 perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(8), pages 12006-12023, August.
    8. Martinet, Vincent & Del Campo, Stellio & Cairns, Robert D., 2022. "Intragenerational inequality aversion and intergenerational equity," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, issue forthcomi.
    9. Daniela Szymańska & Aleksandra Lewandowska, 2015. "Biogas Power Plants in Poland—Structure, Capacity, and Spatial Distribution," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Gennady Ougolnitsky & Olga Gorbaneva, 2022. "Sustainable Management in Active Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(16), pages 1-22, August.
    11. Senetra Adam & Szczepańska Agnieszka & Wasilewicz-Pszczółkowska Monika, 2014. "Analysis of changes in the land use structure of developed and urban areas in Eastern Poland," Bulletin of Geography. Socio-economic Series, Sciendo, vol. 24(24), pages 1-12, June.
    12. Antony, Jürgen & Klarl, Torben, 2022. "Poverty and sustainable development around the world during transition periods," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    13. John M. Hartwick & Ngo Van Long, 2020. "Sustainability with endogenous discounting," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 16(2), pages 216-221, June.
    14. Lucas Bretschger, 2018. "Greening Economy, Graying Society," CER-ETH Press, CER-ETH - Center of Economic Research (CER-ETH) at ETH Zurich, edition 2, number 18-001.
    15. Nana Yang & Jiansong Li & Binbin Lu & Minghai Luo & Linze Li, 2019. "Exploring the Spatial Pattern and Influencing Factors of Land Carrying Capacity in Wuhan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, May.
    16. Andrea Emma Pravitasari & Rista Ardy Priatama & Setyardi Pratika Mulya & Ernan Rustiadi & Alfin Murtadho & Adib Ahmad Kurnia & Izuru Saizen & Candraningratri Ekaputri Widodo, 2022. "Local Sustainability Performance and Its Spatial Interdependency in Urbanizing Java Island: The Case of Jakarta-Bandung Mega Urban Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Batubara, Marwan & Purwanto, Widodo Wahyu & Fauzi, Akhmad, 2016. "Proposing a decision-making process for the development of sustainable oil and gas resources using the petroleum fund: A case study of the East Natuna gas field," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 372-384.
    18. Daniela Szymańska & Jadwiga Biegańska, 2012. "Infrastructure’s and Housing’s Development in the Rural Areas in Poland—Some Problems," Journal of Infrastructure Development, India Development Foundation, vol. 4(1), pages 1-17, June.
    19. Gustavo Leite Gonçalves & Raphael Abrahão & Paulo Rotella Junior & Luiz Célio Souza Rocha, 2022. "Economic Feasibility of Conventional and Building-Integrated Photovoltaics Implementation in Brazil," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Paul Marinescu & Marin Burcea, 2012. "Information and Ecological Behaviour towards the Natural Resources Consumption of the Population of Bucharest," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 14(31), pages 142-156, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2014:i:9:p:6400-6417:d:40260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.