IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i5p487-d69877.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, China

Author

Listed:
  • Xianyu Yu

    (Faculty of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yi Wang

    (Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Ruiqing Niu

    (Institute of Geophysics and Geomatics, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Youjian Hu

    (Faculty of Information Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

In this study, a novel coupling model for landslide susceptibility mapping is presented. In practice, environmental factors may have different impacts at a local scale in study areas. To provide better predictions, a geographically weighted regression (GWR) technique is firstly used in our method to segment study areas into a series of prediction regions with appropriate sizes. Meanwhile, a support vector machine (SVM) classifier is exploited in each prediction region for landslide susceptibility mapping. To further improve the prediction performance, the particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is used in the prediction regions to obtain optimal parameters for the SVM classifier. To evaluate the prediction performance of our model, several SVM-based prediction models are utilized for comparison on a study area of the Wanzhou district in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Experimental results, based on three objective quantitative measures and visual qualitative evaluation, indicate that our model can achieve better prediction accuracies and is more effective for landslide susceptibility mapping. For instance, our model can achieve an overall prediction accuracy of 91.10%, which is 7.8%–19.1% higher than the traditional SVM-based models. In addition, the obtained landslide susceptibility map by our model can demonstrate an intensive correlation between the classified very high-susceptibility zone and the previously investigated landslides.

Suggested Citation

  • Xianyu Yu & Yi Wang & Ruiqing Niu & Youjian Hu, 2016. "A Combination of Geographically Weighted Regression, Particle Swarm Optimization and Support Vector Machine for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study at Wanzhou in the Three Gorges Area, Chin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-35, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:5:p:487-:d:69877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/5/487/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/5/487/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. C. Chalkias & S. Kalogirou & M. Ferentinou, 2014. "Landslide susceptibility, Peloponnese Peninsula in South Greece," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 211-222, April.
    2. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Martin Charlton & Chris Brunsdon, 1997. "Measuring Spatial Variations in Relationships with Geographically Weighted Regression," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Arthur Getis (ed.), Recent Developments in Spatial Analysis, chapter 4, pages 60-82, Springer.
    3. Pawlak, Zdzisaw & Sowinski, Roman, 1994. "Rough set approach to multi-attribute decision analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 72(3), pages 443-459, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuai Li & Zhongyun Ni & Yinbing Zhao & Wei Hu & Zhenrui Long & Haiyu Ma & Guoli Zhou & Yuhao Luo & Chuntao Geng, 2022. "Susceptibility Analysis of Geohazards in the Longmen Mountain Region after the Wenchuan Earthquake," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-30, March.
    2. Xianyu Yu & Yang Xia & Jianguo Zhou & Weiwei Jiang, 2023. "Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Based on Multitemporal Remote Sensing Image Change Detection and Multiexponential Band Math," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-29, January.
    3. Arezoo Mokhtari & Behnam Tashayo & Kaveh Deilami, 2021. "Implications of Nonstationary Effect on Geographically Weighted Total Least Squares Regression for PM 2.5 Estimation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    4. M. Ponziani & D. Ponziani & A. Giorgi & H. Stevenin & S. M. Ratto, 2023. "The use of machine learning techniques for a predictive model of debris flows triggered by short intense rainfall," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 117(1), pages 143-162, May.
    5. Xianyu Yu & Tingting Xiong & Weiwei Jiang & Jianguo Zhou, 2023. "Comparative Assessment of the Efficacy of the Five Kinds of Models in Landslide Susceptibility Map for Factor Screening: A Case Study at Zigui-Badong in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-26, January.
    6. Yumiao Wang & Xueling Wu & Zhangjian Chen & Fu Ren & Luwei Feng & Qingyun Du, 2019. "Optimizing the Predictive Ability of Machine Learning Methods for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping Using SMOTE for Lishui City in Zhejiang Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin, Peizhen & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin, 2021. "Moving towards a sustainable and innovative city: Internal urban traffic accessibility and high-level innovation based on platform monitoring data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    2. Azam, Nouman & Zhang, Yan & Yao, JingTao, 2017. "Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(2), pages 704-714.
    3. Zaras, Kazimierz, 2001. "Rough approximation of a preference relation by a multi-attribute stochastic dominance for determinist and stochastic evaluation problems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 130(2), pages 305-314, April.
    4. Pawlak, Zdzislaw, 1997. "Rough set approach to knowledge-based decision support," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(1), pages 48-57, May.
    5. Chikalov, Igor & Hussain, Shahid & Moshkov, Mikhail, 2018. "Bi-criteria optimization of decision trees with applications to data analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(2), pages 689-701.
    6. Qiang Yang & Ping-an Du & Yong Wang & Bin Liang, 2018. "Developing a rough set based approach for group decision making based on determining weights of decision makers with interval numbers," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 757-779, October.
    7. Hu, Qiwei & Chakhar, Salem & Siraj, Sajid & Labib, Ashraf, 2017. "Spare parts classification in industrial manufacturing using the dominance-based rough set approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(3), pages 1136-1163.
    8. Arezoo Mokhtari & Behnam Tashayo & Kaveh Deilami, 2021. "Implications of Nonstationary Effect on Geographically Weighted Total Least Squares Regression for PM 2.5 Estimation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, July.
    9. LE GALLO, Julie, 2000. "Econométrie spatiale 2 -Hétérogénéité spatiale," LATEC - Document de travail - Economie (1991-2003) 2001-01, LATEC, Laboratoire d'Analyse et des Techniques EConomiques, CNRS UMR 5118, Université de Bourgogne.
    10. Lin, Rong-Ho, 2012. "An integrated model for supplier selection under a fuzzy situation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 138(1), pages 55-61.
    11. Salvatore Barbagallo & Simona Consoli & Nello Pappalardo & Salvatore Greco & Santo Zimbone, 2006. "Discovering Reservoir Operating Rules by a Rough Set Approach," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 20(1), pages 19-36, February.
    12. Greco, Salvatore & Matarazzo, Benedetto & Slowinski, Roman, 2004. "Axiomatic characterization of a general utility function and its particular cases in terms of conjoint measurement and rough-set decision rules," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(2), pages 271-292, October.
    13. Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michael, 2002. "Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 229-246, April.
    14. Doumpos, Michael & Zopounidis, Constantin, 2011. "Preference disaggregation and statistical learning for multicriteria decision support: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 209(3), pages 203-214, March.
    15. Arturo Bujanda & Thomas M. Fullerton, 2017. "Impacts of transportation infrastructure on single-family property values," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(51), pages 5183-5199, November.
    16. Liming Yao & Jiuping Xu & Yifan Li, 2014. "Evaluation of the Efficiency of Low Carbon Industrialization in Cultural and Natural Heritage: Taking Leshan as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-18, June.
    17. Michael Brady & Elena Irwin, 2011. "Accounting for Spatial Effects in Economic Models of Land Use: Recent Developments and Challenges Ahead," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 48(3), pages 487-509, March.
    18. J. Paul Elhorst, 2003. "Specification and Estimation of Spatial Panel Data Models," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 26(3), pages 244-268, July.
    19. Hocine, Amine & Kouaissah, Noureddine, 2020. "XOR analytic hierarchy process and its application in the renewable energy sector," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    20. Yun Kang & Shunxiang Wu & Yuwen Li & Wei Weng, 2017. "New and improved: grey multi-granulation rough sets," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(12), pages 2575-2589, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:5:p:487-:d:69877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.