IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i4p414-d67994.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simulation-Based Comparison of Covariate Adjustment Methods for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre Chaussé

    (Department of Economics, University of Waterloo, Hagey Hall of Humanities, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Jin Liu

    (Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • George Luta

    (Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics and Biomathematics, Georgetown University Medical Center, 4000 Reservoir Road NW, Washington, DC 20057, USA)

Abstract

Covariate adjustment methods are frequently used when baseline covariate information is available for randomized controlled trials. Using a simulation study, we compared the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with three nonparametric covariate adjustment methods with respect to point and interval estimation for the difference between means. The three alternative methods were based on important members of the generalized empirical likelihood (GEL) family, specifically on the empirical likelihood (EL) method, the exponential tilting (ET) method, and the continuous updated estimator (CUE) method. Two criteria were considered for the comparison of the four statistical methods: the root mean squared error and the empirical coverage of the nominal 95% confidence intervals for the difference between means. Based on the results of the simulation study, for sensitivity analysis purposes, we recommend the use of ANCOVA (with robust standard errors when heteroscedasticity is present) together with the CUE-based covariate adjustment method.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre Chaussé & Jin Liu & George Luta, 2016. "A Simulation-Based Comparison of Covariate Adjustment Methods for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:414-:d:67994
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/4/414/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/4/414/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hansen, Lars Peter, 1982. "Large Sample Properties of Generalized Method of Moments Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 50(4), pages 1029-1054, July.
    2. Whitney K. Newey & Richard J. Smith, 2004. "Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 72(1), pages 219-255, January.
    3. Antoine, Bertille & Bonnal, Helene & Renault, Eric, 2007. "On the efficient use of the informational content of estimating equations: Implied probabilities and Euclidean empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 138(2), pages 461-487, June.
    4. Yuichi Kitamura & Taisuke Otsu & Kirill Evdokimov, 2013. "Robustness, Infinitesimal Neighborhoods, and Moment Restrictions," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 81(3), pages 1185-1201, May.
    5. Zeileis, Achim, 2004. "Econometric Computing with HC and HAC Covariance Matrix Estimators," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 11(i10).
    6. Hansen, Lars Peter & Heaton, John & Yaron, Amir, 1996. "Finite-Sample Properties of Some Alternative GMM Estimators," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 14(3), pages 262-280, July.
    7. Susanne M. Schennach, 2007. "Point estimation with exponentially tilted empirical likelihood," Papers 0708.1874, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. repec:bla:ecorec:v:91:y:2015:i::p:1-24 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Alastair R. Hall, 2015. "Econometricians Have Their Moments: GMM at 32," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 91(S1), pages 1-24, June.
    3. Seojeong Lee, 2018. "Asymptotic Refinements of a Misspecification-Robust Bootstrap for Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators," Papers 1806.00953, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2018.
    4. Lee, Seojeong, 2016. "Asymptotic refinements of a misspecification-robust bootstrap for GEL estimators," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 192(1), pages 86-104.
    5. Pierre Chausse & George Luta, 2017. "Casual Inference using Generalized Empirical Likelihood Methods," Working Papers 1707, University of Waterloo, Department of Economics, revised Dec 2017.
    6. Hwang, Jungbin & Kang, Byunghoon & Lee, Seojeong, 2022. "A doubly corrected robust variance estimator for linear GMM," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 276-298.
    7. A. Felipe & N. Martín & P. Miranda & L. Pardo, 2018. "Testing with Exponentially Tilted Empirical Likelihood," Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 1319-1358, December.
    8. Alain Guay & Florian Pelgrin, 2007. "Using Implied Probabilities to Improve Estimation with Unconditional Moment Restrictions," Cahiers de recherche 0747, CIRPEE.
    9. Antoine, Bertille & Dovonon, Prosper, 2021. "Robust estimation with exponentially tilted Hellinger distance," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 224(2), pages 330-344.
    10. Fan, Yanqin & Gentry, Matthew & Li, Tong, 2011. "A new class of asymptotically efficient estimators for moment condition models," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 162(2), pages 268-277, June.
    11. Nikolay Gospodinov & Raymond Kan & Cesare Robotti, 2018. "Asymptotic variance approximations for invariant estimators in uncertain asset-pricing models," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 695-718, August.
    12. Kirill Evdokimov & Yuichi Kitamura & Taisuke Otsu, 2014. "Robust estimation of moment condition models with weakly dependent data," STICERD - Econometrics Paper Series 579, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
    13. repec:cep:stiecm:/2014/579 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Prosper Dovonon, 2016. "Large Sample Properties of the Three-Step Euclidean Likelihood Estimators under Model Misspecification," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 465-514, April.
    15. Lavergne, Pascal, 2015. "Assessing the Approximate Validity of Moment Restrictions," TSE Working Papers 15-562, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised May 2020.
    16. Chaudhuri, Saraswata & Renault, Eric, 2020. "Score tests in GMM: Why use implied probabilities?," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 219(2), pages 260-280.
    17. Alain Guay & Jean-Francois Lamarche, 2005. "The Information Content of Implied Probabilities to Detect Structural Change," Working Papers 0804, Brock University, Department of Economics, revised Oct 2008.
    18. Hill, Jonathan B., 2015. "Robust Generalized Empirical Likelihood for heavy tailed autoregressions with conditionally heteroscedastic errors," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 131-152.
    19. Otsu, Taisuke, 2010. "On Bahadur efficiency of empirical likelihood," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 157(2), pages 248-256, August.
    20. Giuseppe Ragusa, 2011. "Minimum Divergence, Generalized Empirical Likelihoods, and Higher Order Expansions," Econometric Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(4), pages 406-456, August.
    21. Peñaranda, Francisco & Sentana, Enrique, 2012. "Spanning tests in return and stochastic discount factor mean–variance frontiers: A unifying approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 170(2), pages 303-324.
    22. Lô, Serigne N. & Ronchetti, Elvezio, 2012. "Robust small sample accurate inference in moment condition models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 3182-3197.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:4:p:414-:d:67994. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.