IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v13y2016i11p1086-d82182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Psychometric Properties of a 36-Item Version of the “Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool”

Author

Listed:
  • Stefano Toderi

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Viale Berti Pichat, 5-40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Guido Sarchielli

    (School of Psychology and Education, University of Bologna, Piazza Aldo Moro, 90-47521 Cesena (FC), Italy)

Abstract

The development of supervisors’ behaviours has been proposed as an innovative approach for the reduction of employees’ work stress. The UK Health and Safety Executive (HSE) developed the “Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool” (SMCIT), designed to be used within a learning and development intervention. However, its psychometric properties have never been evaluated, and the length of the questionnaire (66 items) limits its practical applicability. We developed a brief 36-item version of the questionnaire, assessed its psychometric properties and studied the relationship with the employees’ psychosocial work environment. 353 employees filled in the brief SMCIT and the “Stress Management Indicator Tool”. The latter is a self-report questionnaire developed by the UK HSE, measuring workers’ perceptions of seven dimensions of the psychosocial work environment that if not properly managed can lead to harm. Data were analysed with structural equation modelling and multiple regressions. The results confirmed the factorial structure of the brief SMCIT questionnaire and mainly supported the convergent validity and internal consistency of the scales. Furthermore, with few exceptions, the relations hypothesized between supervisors’ competencies and the psychosocial work environment were confirmed, supporting the criterion validity of the revised questionnaire and the UK HSE framework. We conclude that the brief 36-item version of the SMCIT represents an important step toward the development of interventions directed at supervisors and we discuss the practical implications for work stress prevention.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefano Toderi & Guido Sarchielli, 2016. "Psychometric Properties of a 36-Item Version of the “Stress Management Competency Indicator Tool”," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1086-:d:82182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1086/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/13/11/1086/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Prottas, 2008. "Perceived Behavioral Integrity: Relationships with Employee Attitudes, Well-Being, and Absenteeism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 81(2), pages 313-322, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesco Perrini & Angeloantonio Russo & Antonio Tencati & Clodia Vurro, 2011. "Deconstructing the Relationship Between Corporate Social and Financial Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 102(1), pages 59-76, March.
    2. David Prottas, 2013. "Relationships Among Employee Perception of Their Manager’s Behavioral Integrity, Moral Distress, and Employee Attitudes and Well-Being," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 113(1), pages 51-60, March.
    3. Belinda Xarba & Alketa Bejko & Etleva Peta, 2015. "Record-Keeping as a Factor Related to Meeting the Personal Financial Ratios Guideline," European Journal of Economics and Business Studies Articles, Revistia Research and Publishing, vol. 1, ejes_v1_i.
    4. He Peng & Feng Wei, 2018. "Trickle-Down Effects of Perceived Leader Integrity on Employee Creativity: A Moderated Mediation Model," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(3), pages 837-851, July.
    5. He Peng & Feng Wei, 2020. "How and When Does Leader Behavioral Integrity Influence Employee Voice? The Roles of Team Independence Climate and Corporate Ethical Values," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 505-521, October.
    6. K. Michele Kacmar & Reginald Tucker, 2016. "The Moderating Effect of Supervisor’s Behavioral Integrity on the Relationship between Regulatory Focus and Impression Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 87-98, April.
    7. Yinghong Susan Wei & Hugh O’Neill & Nan Zhou, 2020. "How Does Perceived Integrity in Leadership Matter to Firms in a Transitional Economy?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(4), pages 623-641, December.
    8. Yongjun Choi & David J. Yoon & Dongkyu Kim, 2020. "Leader Behavioral Integrity and Employee In-Role Performance: The Roles of Coworker Support and Job Autonomy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Mark Gosling & Heh Huang, 2009. "The Fit Between Integrity and Integrative Social Contracts Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 407-417, December.
    10. Martha Andrews & K. Kacmar & Charles Kacmar, 2015. "The Interactive Effects of Behavioral Integrity and Procedural Justice on Employee Job Tension," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 126(3), pages 371-379, February.
    11. Gretchen R. Vogelgesang & Craig Crossley & Tony Simons & Bruce J. Avolio, 2021. "Behavioral Integrity: Examining the Effects of Trust Velocity and Psychological Contract Breach," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 172(1), pages 175-190, August.
    12. Norman Bishara & Cindy Schipani, 2009. "Complementary Alternative Benefits to Promote Peace," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 89(4), pages 539-557, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:13:y:2016:i:11:p:1086-:d:82182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.