IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i8p9141-9153d53825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brand Cigarillos: Low Price but High Particulate Matter Levels—Is Their Favorable Taxation in the European Union Justified?

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Wasel
  • Michael Boll
  • Michaela Schulze
  • Daniel Mueller
  • Matthias Bundschuh
  • David A. Groneberg
  • Alexander Gerber

Abstract

Background : Second hand smoke (ETS)-associated particulate matter (PM) contributes considerably to indoor air contamination and constitutes a health risk for passive smokers. Easy to measure, PM is a useful parameter to estimate the dosage of ETS that passive smokers are exposed to. Apart from its suitability as a surrogate parameter for ETS-exposure, PM itself affects human morbidity and mortality in a dose-dependent manner. We think that ETS-associated PM should be considered an independent hazard factor, separately from the many other known harmful compounds of ETS. We believe that brand-specific and tobacco-product-specific differences in the release of PM matter and that these differences are of public interest. Methods : To generate ETS of cigarettes and cigarillos as standardized and reproducible as possible, an automatic second hand smoke emitter (AETSE) was developed and placed in a glass chamber. L&M cigarettes (“without additives”, “red label”, “blue label”), L&M filtered cigarillos (“red”) and 3R4F standard research cigarettes (as reference) were smoked automatically according to a self-developed, standardized protocol until the tobacco product was smoked down to 8 mm distance from the tipping paper of the filter. Results : Mean concentration (Cmean) and area under the curve (AUC) in a plot of PM 2.5 against time were measured, and compared. CmeanPM 2.5 were found to be 518 μg/m 3 for 3R4F cigarettes, 576 μg/m 3 for L&M “without additives” (“red”), 448 μg/m 3 for L&M “blue label”, 547 μg/m 3 for L&M “red label”, and 755 μg/m 3 for L&M filtered cigarillos (“red”). AUCPM2.5-values were 208,214 μg/m 3 ·s for 3R4F reference cigarettes, 204,629 μg/m 3 ·s for L&M “without additives” (“red”), 152,718 μg/m 3 ·s for L&M “blue label”, 238,098 μg/m 3 ·s for L&M “red label” and 796,909 μg/m 3 ·s for L&M filtered cigarillos (“red”). Conclusion : Considering the large and significant differences in particulate matter emissions between cigarettes and cigarillos, we think that a favorable taxation of cigarillos is not justifiable.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Wasel & Michael Boll & Michaela Schulze & Daniel Mueller & Matthias Bundschuh & David A. Groneberg & Alexander Gerber, 2015. "Brand Cigarillos: Low Price but High Particulate Matter Levels—Is Their Favorable Taxation in the European Union Justified?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:8:p:9141-9153:d:53825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/9141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/8/9141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexander Gerber & Alexander Bigelow & Michaela Schulze & David A. Groneberg, 2015. "Brand Cigarillos — A Cheap and Less Harmful Alternative to Cigarettes? Particulate Matter Emissions Suggest Otherwise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Chiang-Ming Chen & Kuo-Liang Chang & Lin Lin & Jwo-Leun Lee, 2014. "Brand switching or reduced consumption? A study of how cigarette taxes affect tobacco consumption," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 15(9), pages 991-998, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Markus Braun & Friedemann Koger & Doris Klingelhöfer & Ruth Müller & David A. Groneberg, 2019. "Particulate Matter Emissions of Four Different Cigarette Types of One Popular Brand: Influence of Tobacco Strength and Additives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, January.
    2. Maria Schulz & Alexander Gerber & David A. Groneberg, 2016. "Are Filter-Tipped Cigarettes Still Less Harmful than Non-Filter Cigarettes?—A Laser Spectrometric Particulate Matter Analysis from the Non-Smokers Point of View," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Markus Braun & Rawya Al-Qaysi & Doris Klingelhöfer & Ruth Müller & David A. Groneberg, 2020. "High Particulate Matter Burden of Cigarettes from the United Arab Emirates and Germany: Are There Country-Specific Differences?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Vittoria Cammalleri & Daniela Marotta & Carmela Protano & Matteo Vitali & Paolo Villari & Maria Sofia Cattaruzza & on behalf of the Smoke-free Department Working Group, 2020. "How Do Combustion and Non-Combustion Products Used Outdoors Affect Outdoor and Indoor Particulate Matter Levels? A Field Evaluation Near the Entrance of an Italian University Library," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-15, July.
    5. Nora Kant & Ruth Müller & Markus Braun & Alexander Gerber & David Groneberg, 2016. "Particulate Matter in Second-Hand Smoke Emitted from Different Cigarette Sizes and Types of the Brand Vogue Mainly Smoked by Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greta Gerlach & Markus Braun & Janis Dröge & David A. Groneberg, 2022. "Do Budget Cigarettes Emit More Particles? An Aerosol Spectrometric Comparison of Particulate Matter Concentrations between Private-Label Cigarettes and More Expensive Brand-Name Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-11, May.
    2. Maria Schulz & Alexander Gerber & David A. Groneberg, 2016. "Are Filter-Tipped Cigarettes Still Less Harmful than Non-Filter Cigarettes?—A Laser Spectrometric Particulate Matter Analysis from the Non-Smokers Point of View," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-11, April.
    3. Jarmila Zimmermannová & Jan Široký, 2016. "Economic Impacts of Cigarette Taxation Development in the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 64(6), pages 2191-2200.
    4. Markus Braun & Friedemann Koger & Doris Klingelhöfer & Ruth Müller & David A. Groneberg, 2019. "Particulate Matter Emissions of Four Different Cigarette Types of One Popular Brand: Influence of Tobacco Strength and Additives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-11, January.
    5. Burguillo, Mercedes & Romero-Jordán, Desiderio & Sanz-Sanz, José-Félix, 2019. "Efficacy of the tobacco tax policy in the presence of product heterogeneity: A pseudo-panel approach applied to Spain," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(10), pages 924-931.
    6. Durr-e-Nayab & Muhammad Nasir & Junaid Alam Memon & Omer Siddique, 2021. "Switch, Reduce, OR Quit: How Do Smokers Respond to Tobacco Tax Increases in Pakistan?," PIDE Research Report 2021:3, Pakistan Institute of Development Economics.
    7. Paolo Liberati & Francesco Crespi & Massimo Paradiso & Simone Tedeschi & Antonio Scialà, 2018. "Smokers Are Different: The Heterogeneity Of Smokers’ Responses To Price Increases," Departmental Working Papers of Economics - University 'Roma Tre' 0237, Department of Economics - University Roma Tre.
    8. Nora Kant & Ruth Müller & Markus Braun & Alexander Gerber & David Groneberg, 2016. "Particulate Matter in Second-Hand Smoke Emitted from Different Cigarette Sizes and Types of the Brand Vogue Mainly Smoked by Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-10, August.
    9. Crespi, Francesco & Liberati, Paolo & Paradiso, Massimo & Scialà, Antonio & Tedeschi, Simone, 2021. "Smokers are different: The impact of price increases on smoking reduction and downtrading," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 326-334.
    10. Alexander Gerber & Alexander Bigelow & Michaela Schulze & David A. Groneberg, 2015. "Brand Cigarillos — A Cheap and Less Harmful Alternative to Cigarettes? Particulate Matter Emissions Suggest Otherwise," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:8:p:9141-9153:d:53825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.