IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v3y2023i1p11-196d1081582.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand

Author

Listed:
  • Vladyslav Zakharovskyi

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand)

  • Károly Németh

    (School of Agriculture and Environment, Massey University, Palmerston North 4474, New Zealand
    Lithosphere Physics Group, Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, 9400 Sopron, Hungary
    The Geoconservation Trust Aotearoa Pacific, Ōpōtiki 3122, New Zealand
    National Earthquakes and Volcanoes Program, Saudi Geological Survey, Jeddah 21514, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Hydrology is one of the most influential elements of geodiversity, where geology and geomorphology stand as the main values of abiotic nature. Hydrological erosion created by river systems destructing rock formations (eluvial process) from streams’ sources and then transporting and redepositing (alluvial process) the rock debris into the main river channels, make it an ongoing transformation element of the abiotic environment along channel networks. Hence, this manuscript demonstrates the influence of hydrological elements on geosite recognition, specifically for qualitative–quantitative assessment of geodiversity, which is based on a combination of geological and geomorphological values. In this concept, a stream system will be treated as an additional element. The basement area of the Manawatu Region has been utilized as the territory for the research of hydrological assessment. The region is in the southern part of the North Island of New Zealand and has relatively low geological and geomorphological values and diversity. The Strahler order parameter will be demonstrated as a hydrological element for geodiversity assessment. This parameter has been chosen as one of the most common and acceptable within geographical information system (GIS) environments. The result of this assessment compares the influences of Strahler order on qualitative–quantitative assessment of geodiversity and provides its drawbacks. Additionally, the places with high values will be considered for more accurate field observation to be nominated as potential geosites with an opportunity for geoeducational and geotouristic significance.

Suggested Citation

  • Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2023. "Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:11-196:d:1081582
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/11/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/3/1/11/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Hyunju Jo & Harumi Ikei & Yoshifumi Miyazaki, 2022. "Physiological and Psychological Responses of Viewing a Waterfall Image: A Crossover Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-9, December.
    3. África de la Hera-Portillo & Julio López-Gutiérrez & Luis Moreno-Merino & Miguel Llorente-Isidro & Rod Fensham & Mario Fernández & Marwan Ghanem & Karmah Salman & Jose Ángel Sánchez-Fabián & Nicolás G, 2023. "Geodiversity of Las Loras UNESCO Global Geopark: Hydrogeological Significance of Groundwater and Landscape Interaction and Conceptual Model of Functioning," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-32, January.
    4. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Quantitative-Qualitative Method for Quick Assessment of Geodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Geomorphological Model Comparison for Geosites, Utilizing Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity, Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, October.
    6. Juliana P. Silva & Diamantino I. Pereira & Alexandre M. Aguiar & Cleide Rodrigues, 2013. "Geodiversity assessment of the Xingu drainage basin," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 254-262, June.
    7. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mousa, Fatma A. & Ruban, Dmitry A. & Abu El-Hassan, Mohamed M. & Sallam, Emad S., 2024. "Late Mesozoic–Cenozoic geoheritage resources of the Kharga Oasis (Egypt): Novel assessment, exploitation perspectives, and policy implications," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Valentini & Veronica Guerra & Olivia Nesci, 2023. "The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone Ridge in the North-Marchean Apennines (Central Italy): A Potential Geopark?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Geomorphological Model Comparison for Geosites, Utilizing Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity, Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Mária Barančoková & Daniela Hutárová & Maroš Nikolaj, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity for Conservation Purposes in Slovenské rudohorie Mountains (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    4. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Qualitative-Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity of Western Samoa (SW Pacific) to Identify Places of Interest for Further Geoconservation, Geoeducation, and Geotourism Development," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Borut Stojilković, 2022. "Towards Transferable Use of Terrain Ruggedness Component in the Geodiversity Index," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Alejandro Arias-Díaz & Hugo Murcia & Felipe Vallejo-Hincapié & Károly Németh, 2023. "Understanding Geodiversity for Sustainable Development in the Chinchiná River Basin, Caldas, Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-36, November.
    7. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    8. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Tianyu Rong & Shuting Xu & Yayan Lu & Yanjun Tong & Zhaoping Yang, 2022. "Quantitative Assessment of Spatial Pattern of Geodiversity in the Tibetan Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    10. Pietro Marescotti & Giulia Castello & Antonino Briguglio & Maria Cristina Caprioglio & Laura Crispini & Marco Firpo, 2022. "Geosite Assessment in the Beigua UNESCO Global Geopark (Liguria, Italy): A Case Study in Linking Geoheritage with Education, Tourism, and Community Involvement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, September.
    11. Antonio Martínez-Graña & José Angel González-Delgado & Carlos Nieto & Vanessa Villalba & Teresa Cabero, 2023. "Geodiversity and Geoheritage to Promote Geotourism Using Augmented Reality and 3D Virtual Flights in the Arosa Estuary (NW Spain)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, May.
    12. Margaret Kalacska & Oliver Lucanus & Leandro Sousa & J. Pablo Arroyo-Mora, 2020. "High-Resolution Surface Water Classifications of the Xingu River, Brazil, Pre and Post Operationalization of the Belo Monte Hydropower Complex," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, August.
    13. Marcin Siłuch & Waldemar Kociuba & Leszek Gawrysiak & Piotr Bartmiński, 2023. "Assessment and Quantitative Evaluation of Loess Area Geomorphodiversity Using Multiresolution DTMs (Roztocze Region, SE Poland)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    14. Paola Coratza & Irene Maria Bollati & Valeria Panizza & Pierluigi Brandolini & Doriano Castaldini & Franco Cucchi & Giacomo Deiana & Maurizio Del Monte & Francesco Faccini & Furio Finocchiaro & Dario , 2021. "Advances in Geoheritage Mapping: Application to Iconic Geomorphological Examples from the Italian Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-37, October.
    15. Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    16. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Quantitative-Qualitative Method for Quick Assessment of Geodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    18. Edmundo Wallace Monteiro Lucas & Fabrício Daniel dos Santos Silva & Francisco de Assis Salviano de Souza & David Duarte Cavalcante Pinto & Heliofábio Barros Gomes & Helber Barros Gomes & Mayara Christ, 2022. "Regionalization of Climate Change Simulations for the Assessment of Impacts on Precipitation, Flow Rate and Electricity Generation in the Xingu River Basin in the Brazilian Amazon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:3:y:2023:i:1:p:11-196:d:1081582. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.