IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v12y2023i11p2053-d1278477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Geodiversity for Sustainable Development in the Chinchiná River Basin, Caldas, Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Alejandro Arias-Díaz

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Estratigrafía (IIES), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    Grupo de Investigación en Estratigrafia y Vulcanología (GIEV) Cumanday, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    AURORA, Science Communication SAS, Manizales 170001, Colombia)

  • Hugo Murcia

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Estratigrafía (IIES), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    Grupo de Investigación en Estratigrafia y Vulcanología (GIEV) Cumanday, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    Departamento de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia)

  • Felipe Vallejo-Hincapié

    (Instituto de Investigaciones en Estratigrafía (IIES), Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    Grupo de Investigación en Estratigrafia y Vulcanología (GIEV) Cumanday, Universidad de Caldas, Manizales 170001, Colombia
    AURORA, Science Communication SAS, Manizales 170001, Colombia)

  • Károly Németh

    (Saudi Geological Survey, Jeddah 21514, Saudi Arabia
    Institute of Earth Physics and Space Science, H-9400 Sopron, Hungary)

Abstract

Geodiversity, comprising both endogenous and exogenous geological processes, plays a crucial role in shaping the structure and functionality of natural systems, alongside its substantial impact on human well-being. However, the often-overlooked interconnection between geodiversity components limits our comprehension of geosystems. In the Chinchiná River Basin (CRB) in Colombia, located in the northern Andes in South America, we established criteria to differentiate geodiversity classes, calculated indices to understand the distribution of geological elements, and discussed systemic relationships. This comprehensive approach lays the foundation for a holistic comprehension of the territory’s structure and functionality. Our findings revealed the convergence in an area of 1052 km 2 of 10 rock types, 7 slope ranges, 13 landforms, 5 drainage density features, 610.4 km of faults with 9 kinematic tendencies, 5 soil orders, 5 climate types, a 3328 km surface drainage network with 7 hydrographic orders, 1 underground aquifer, 4 areas with lakes, 2 zones with glaciers, 27 polygenetic and monogenetic volcanoes, and several thermal springs. This discussion explores the implications of various methodologies used to establish the value of the general geodiversity index while also examining the relationships between abiotic elements and their distribution patterns. This forms a fundamental basis for understanding the geosystem services of the basin in terms of regulation, support, and provisioning processes, as well as the culture and knowledge derived from geodiversity. These conceptual elements are indispensable for enhancing the sustainability of a region that is susceptible to the impacts of climate change. Furthermore, they serve as the foundations for the objective’s achievement, as set by the UNESCO Global Geopark project “Volcán del Ruiz”, currently ongoing within the region.

Suggested Citation

  • Alejandro Arias-Díaz & Hugo Murcia & Felipe Vallejo-Hincapié & Károly Németh, 2023. "Understanding Geodiversity for Sustainable Development in the Chinchiná River Basin, Caldas, Colombia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-36, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2053-:d:1278477
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2053/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/12/11/2053/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Catarina Lopes & Zara Teixeira & Diamantino I. Pereira & Paulo Pereira, 2023. "Identifying Optimal Cell Size for Geodiversity Quantitative Assessment with Richness, Diversity and Evenness Indices," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-26, May.
    2. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, August.
    3. Juliana P. Silva & Diamantino I. Pereira & Alexandre M. Aguiar & Cleide Rodrigues, 2013. "Geodiversity assessment of the Xingu drainage basin," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 254-262, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2023. "Recognition of Potential Geosites Utilizing a Hydrological Model within Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity in the Manawatu River Catchment, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Geomorphological Model Comparison for Geosites, Utilizing Qualitative–Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity, Coromandel Peninsula, New Zealand," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(4), pages 1-20, October.
    3. Laura Valentini & Veronica Guerra & Olivia Nesci, 2023. "The Mt. Catria–Mt. Nerone Ridge in the North-Marchean Apennines (Central Italy): A Potential Geopark?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Mária Barančoková & Daniela Hutárová & Maroš Nikolaj, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Geodiversity for Conservation Purposes in Slovenské rudohorie Mountains (Slovakia)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Margaret Kalacska & Oliver Lucanus & Leandro Sousa & J. Pablo Arroyo-Mora, 2020. "High-Resolution Surface Water Classifications of the Xingu River, Brazil, Pre and Post Operationalization of the Belo Monte Hydropower Complex," Data, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-12, August.
    6. Marcin Siłuch & Waldemar Kociuba & Leszek Gawrysiak & Piotr Bartmiński, 2023. "Assessment and Quantitative Evaluation of Loess Area Geomorphodiversity Using Multiresolution DTMs (Roztocze Region, SE Poland)," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24, January.
    7. Tomasz Bartuś & Wojciech Mastej, 2023. "Morphodiversity as a Tool in Geoconservation: A Case Study in a Mountain Area (Pieniny Mts, Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2021. "Quantitative-Qualitative Method for Quick Assessment of Geodiversity," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    9. Paweł Wolniewicz, 2023. "Quantifying Geodiversity at the Continental Scale: Limitations and Prospects," Resources, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-28, May.
    10. Vladyslav Zakharovskyi & Károly Németh, 2022. "Scale Influence on Qualitative–Quantitative Geodiversity Assessments for the Geosite Recognition of Western Samoa," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-15, August.
    11. Andrea Ferrando & Francesco Faccini & Guido Paliaga & Paola Coratza, 2021. "A Quantitative GIS and AHP Based Analysis for Geodiversity Assessment and Mapping," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-18, September.
    12. Edmundo Wallace Monteiro Lucas & Fabrício Daniel dos Santos Silva & Francisco de Assis Salviano de Souza & David Duarte Cavalcante Pinto & Heliofábio Barros Gomes & Helber Barros Gomes & Mayara Christ, 2022. "Regionalization of Climate Change Simulations for the Assessment of Impacts on Precipitation, Flow Rate and Electricity Generation in the Xingu River Basin in the Brazilian Amazon," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-26, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:12:y:2023:i:11:p:2053-:d:1278477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.