IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v16y2024i8p259-d1441218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Weighted Voting-Based Collaborated Malware Detection for Zero-Day Malware: A Case Study on VirusTotal and MalwareBazaar

Author

Listed:
  • Naonobu Okazaki

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Shotaro Usuzaki

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Tsubasa Waki

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan)

  • Hyoga Kawagoe

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan)

  • Mirang Park

    (Faculty of Information Technology, Kanagawa Institute of Technology, 1030 Shimo-Ogino, Atsugi-shi 243-0292, Kanagawa, Japan)

  • Hisaaki Yamaba

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan)

  • Kentaro Aburada

    (Faculty of Engineering, University of Miyazaki, 1-1 Gakuen-Kibanadai-Nishi, Miyazaki-shi 889-2192, Miyazaki, Japan)

Abstract

We propose a detection system incorporating a weighted voting mechanism that reflects the vote’s reliability based on the accuracy of each detector’s examination, which overcomes the problem of cooperative detection. Collaborative malware detection is an effective strategy against zero-day attacks compared to one using only a single detector because the strategy might pick up attacks that a single detector overlooked. However, cooperative detection is still ineffective if most anti-virus engines lack sufficient intelligence to detect zero-day malware. Most collaborative methods rely on majority voting, which prioritizes the quantity of votes rather than the quality of those votes. Therefore, our study investigated the zero-day malware detection accuracy of the collaborative system that optimally rates their weight of votes based on their malware categories of expertise of each anti-virus engine. We implemented the prototype system with the VirusTotal API and evaluated the system using real malware registered in MalwareBazaar. To evaluate the effectiveness of zero-day malware detection, we measured recall using the inspection results on the same day the malware was registered in the MalwareBazaar repository. Through experiments, we confirmed that the proposed system can suppress the false negatives of uniformly weighted voting and improve detection accuracy against new types of malware.

Suggested Citation

  • Naonobu Okazaki & Shotaro Usuzaki & Tsubasa Waki & Hyoga Kawagoe & Mirang Park & Hisaaki Yamaba & Kentaro Aburada, 2024. "Optimal Weighted Voting-Based Collaborated Malware Detection for Zero-Day Malware: A Case Study on VirusTotal and MalwareBazaar," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-16, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:259-:d:1441218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/8/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/16/8/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akira Akabayashi & Eisuke Nakazawa & Hiroyasu Ino, 2022. "Could artificial intelligence hijack author contributions?," Nature, Nature, vol. 606(7915), pages 653-653, June.
    2. Mustafa İçen, 2022. "The future of education utilizing artificial intelligence in Turkey," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Ben Vinod, 2022. "Artificial Intelligence and Emerging Technologies in Hospitality," Management for Professionals, in: Revenue Management in the Lodging Industry, chapter 9, pages 279-313, Springer.
    4. Chunhao Ma & Jian Ye, 2022. "Linking artificial intelligence to service sabotage," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(13-14), pages 1054-1074, October.
    5. Ariel K. H. Lui & Maggie C. M. Lee & Eric W. T. Ngai, 2022. "Impact of artificial intelligence investment on firm value," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 308(1), pages 373-388, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Fernández, Gastón P. & Rammer, Christian, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and firm-level productivity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 188-205.
    2. Gong Cheng & Eric Jondeau & Benoit Mojon & Dimitri Vayanos, 2023. "The impact of green investors on stock prices," BIS Working Papers 1127, Bank for International Settlements.
    3. Chunhao Ma & Biying Wang & Caozhi Sun & Le Lin, 2023. "The Spillover Effect of Emotional Labor: How It Shapes Frontline Employees’ Proactive Innovation Behavior," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    4. Cresswell, Kathrin & Rigby, Michael & Magrabi, Farah & Scott, Philip & Brender, Jytte & Craven, Catherine K. & Wong, Zoie Shui-Yee & Kukhareva, Polina & Ammenwerth, Elske & Georgiou, Andrew & Medlock,, 2023. "The need to strengthen the evaluation of the impact of Artificial Intelligence-based decision support systems on healthcare provision," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    5. Ksenia V. Ekimova, 2023. "Development of the potential of the digital economy of Russian regions through artificial intelligence humanisation," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    6. Lívia Kelebercová & Michal Munk & František Forgáč, 2023. "Could You Understand Me? The Relationship among Method Complexity, Preprocessing Complexity, Interpretability, and Accuracy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Chi Zhang & Xinyang Li & Andrea Tamoni & Misha Beek & Andrew Ang, 2024. "ESG risk and returns implied by demand-based asset pricing models," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(3), pages 203-221, May.
    8. Konstantinos Mira & Francesca Bugiotti & Tatiana Morosuk, 2023. "Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Energy Conversion and Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-36, November.
    9. Zhou, Shuai & Yi, Ni & Rasiah, Rajah & Zhao, Haipeng & Mo, Zile, 2024. "An empirical study on the dark side of service employees’ AI awareness: Behavioral responses, emotional mechanisms, and mitigating factors," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    10. Yaliu Yang & Yuan Wang & Yingyan Zhang & Conghu Liu, 2022. "Data-Driven Coupling Coordination Development of Regional Innovation EROB Composite System: An Integrated Model Perspective," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-25, June.
    11. Ákos Jarjabka & Norbert Sipos & Gabriella Kuráth, 2024. "Quo vadis higher education? Post-pandemic success digital competencies of the higher educators – a Hungarian university case and actions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    12. Mejd Aures BENLALA, 2023. "Exploring Risks and Issues Related to Policy Making and Regulation in FinTech," Perspectives of Law and Public Administration, Societatea de Stiinte Juridice si Administrative (Society of Juridical and Administrative Sciences), vol. 12(2), pages 249-255, June.
    13. Hengjun Mei & Simona-Aurelia Bodog & Daniel Badulescu, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Sustainable Banking Services: The Critical Role of Technological Literacy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-25, October.
    14. Sleep, Stefan & Gala, Prachi & Harrison, Dana E., 2023. "Removing silos to enable data-driven decisions: The importance of marketing and IT knowledge, cooperation, and information quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:16:y:2024:i:8:p:259-:d:1441218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.