IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i1p35-d1033902.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Redactable Blockchain: Comprehensive Review, Mechanisms, Challenges, Open Issues and Future Research Directions

Author

Listed:
  • Shams Mhmood Abd Ali

    (School of Computer Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia
    College of Literature, Aliraqia University, Hayba Katoon, Street 22, Avenue 308, Adhamyh, Baghdad 7366, Iraq)

  • Mohd Najwadi Yusoff

    (School of Computer Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia)

  • Hasan Falah Hasan

    (School of Computer Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor 11800, Penang, Malaysia
    College of Engineering, Aliraqia University, Hayba Katoon, Street 22, Avenue 308, Adhamyh, Baghdad 7366, Iraq)

Abstract

The continuous advancements of blockchain applications impose constant improvements on their technical features. Particularly immutability, a highly secure blockchain attribute forbidding unauthorized or illicit data editing or deletion, which functions as crucial blockchain security. Nonetheless, the security function is currently being challenged due to improper data stored, such as child pornography, copyright violation, and lately the enaction of the “Right to be Forgotten (RtbF)” principle disseminated by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), where it requires blockchain data to be redacted to suit current applications’ urgent demands, and even compliance with the regulation is a challenge and an unfeasible practice for various blockchain technology providers owing to the immutability characteristic. To overcome this challenge, mutable blockchain is highly demanded to solve previously mentioned issues, where controlled and supervised amendments to certain content within constrained privileges granted are suggested by several researchers through numerous blockchain redaction mechanisms using chameleon and non-chameleon hashing function approaches, and methods were proposed to achieve reasonable policies while ensuring high blockchain security levels. Accordingly, the current study seeks to thoroughly define redaction implementation challenges and security properties criteria. The analysis performed has mapped these criteria with chameleon-based research methodologies, technical approaches, and the latest cryptographic techniques implemented to resolve the challenge posed by the policy in which comparisons paved current open issues, leading to shaping future research directions in the scoped field.

Suggested Citation

  • Shams Mhmood Abd Ali & Mohd Najwadi Yusoff & Hasan Falah Hasan, 2023. "Redactable Blockchain: Comprehensive Review, Mechanisms, Challenges, Open Issues and Future Research Directions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:35-:d:1033902
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/1/35/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/1/35/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Hyla & Jerzy Pejaś, 2019. "eHealth Integrity Model Based on Permissioned Blockchain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Baocheng Wang & Zetao Li, 2021. "Healthchain: A Privacy Protection System for Medical Data Based on Blockchain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Spyros Voulgaris & Nikos Fotiou & Vasilios A. Siris & George C. Polyzos & Mikael Jaatinen & Yannis Oikonomidis, 2019. "Blockchain Technology for Intelligent Environments," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abderrahim Zannou & Abdelhak Boulaalam & El Habib Nfaoui, 2020. "SIoT: A New Strategy to Improve the Network Lifetime with an Efficient Search Process," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    2. Kithmini Godewatte Arachchige & Philip Branch & Jason But, 2023. "Evaluation of Blockchain Networks’ Scalability Limitations in Low-Powered Internet of Things (IoT) Sensor Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    3. Xiaolin Li & Hongbo Jiao & Liming Cheng & Yilin Yin & Huimin Li & Wenqing Mu & Ruirui Zhang, 2023. "A Quantitative and Qualitative Review of Blockchain Research from 2015 to 2021," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Haoli Sun & Bingfeng Pi & Jun Sun & Takeshi Miyamae & Masanobu Morinaga, 2021. "SASLedger: A Secured, Accelerated Scalable Storage Solution for Distributed Ledger Systems," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, November.
    5. José A. García-Berná & Sofia Ouhbi & José L. Fernández-Alemán & Juan M. Carrillo de Gea & Joaquín Nicolás & Begoña Moros & Ambrosio Toval, 2021. "A Study on the Relationship between Usability of GUIs and Power Consumption of a PC: The Case of PHRs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Dénes László Fekete & Attila Kiss, 2021. "A Survey of Ledger Technology-Based Databases," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Horst Treiblmaier, 2022. "What Is Coming across the Horizon and How Can We Handle It? Bitcoin Scenarios as a Starting Point for Rigorous and Relevant Research," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, May.
    8. Menghua Wang & Xuedong Liang & Zhi Li, 2021. "Research on the Evaluation Index System of the Soil Remediation Effect Based on Blockchain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Soukaina Bouarourou & Abderrahim Zannou & El Habib Nfaoui & Abdelhak Boulaalam, 2023. "An Efficient Model-Based Clustering via Joint Multiple Sink Placement for WSNs," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:1:p:35-:d:1033902. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.