IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i9p317-d1244432.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Blockchain Networks’ Scalability Limitations in Low-Powered Internet of Things (IoT) Sensor Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Kithmini Godewatte Arachchige

    (Department of Telecommunications, Electrical, Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Swinburne University, Melbourne 3122, Australia)

  • Philip Branch

    (Department of Telecommunications, Electrical, Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Swinburne University, Melbourne 3122, Australia)

  • Jason But

    (Department of Telecommunications, Electrical, Robotics and Biomedical Engineering, Swinburne University, Melbourne 3122, Australia)

Abstract

With the development of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies, industries such as healthcare have started using low-powered sensor-based devices. Because IoT devices are typically low-powered, they are susceptible to cyber intrusions. As an emerging information security solution, blockchain technology has considerable potential for protecting low-powered IoT end devices. Blockchain technology provides promising security features such as cryptography, hash functions, time stamps, and a distributed ledger function. Therefore, blockchain technology can be a robust security technology for securing IoT low-powered devices. However, the integration of blockchain and IoT technologies raises a number of research questions. Scalability is one of the most significant. Blockchain’ scalability of low-powered sensor networks needs to be evaluated to identify the practical application of both technologies in low-powered sensor networks. In this paper, we analyse the scalability limitations of three commonly used blockchain algorithms running on low-powered single-board computers communicating in a wireless sensor network. We assess the scalability limitations of three blockchain networks as we increase the number of nodes. Our analysis shows considerable scalability variations between three blockchain networks. The results indicate that some blockchain networks can have over 800 ms network latency and some blockchain networks may use a bandwidth over 1600 Kbps. This work will contribute to developing efficient blockchain-based IoT sensor networks.

Suggested Citation

  • Kithmini Godewatte Arachchige & Philip Branch & Jason But, 2023. "Evaluation of Blockchain Networks’ Scalability Limitations in Low-Powered Internet of Things (IoT) Sensor Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:317-:d:1244432
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/9/317/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/9/317/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tomasz Hyla & Jerzy Pejaś, 2019. "eHealth Integrity Model Based on Permissioned Blockchain," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Muhammad Tahir & Muhammad Sardaraz & Shakoor Muhammad & Muhammad Saud Khan, 2020. "A Lightweight Authentication and Authorization Framework for Blockchain-Enabled IoT Network in Health-Informatics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Jesús Peral & Eduardo Gallego & David Gil & Mohan Tanniru & Prashant Khambekar, 2020. "Using Visualization to Build Transparency in a Healthcare Blockchain Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raman Singh & Sean Sturley & Hitesh Tewari, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled Chebyshev Polynomial-Based Group Authentication for Secure Communication in an Internet of Things Network," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Shams Mhmood Abd Ali & Mohd Najwadi Yusoff & Hasan Falah Hasan, 2023. "Redactable Blockchain: Comprehensive Review, Mechanisms, Challenges, Open Issues and Future Research Directions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Abderrahim Zannou & Abdelhak Boulaalam & El Habib Nfaoui, 2020. "SIoT: A New Strategy to Improve the Network Lifetime with an Efficient Search Process," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, December.
    4. Habib Ullah Khan & Yasir Ali & Faheem Khan, 2023. "A Features-Based Privacy Preserving Assessment Model for Authentication of Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Devices in Healthcare," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, February.
    5. José A. García-Berná & Sofia Ouhbi & José L. Fernández-Alemán & Juan M. Carrillo de Gea & Joaquín Nicolás & Begoña Moros & Ambrosio Toval, 2021. "A Study on the Relationship between Usability of GUIs and Power Consumption of a PC: The Case of PHRs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Dénes László Fekete & Attila Kiss, 2021. "A Survey of Ledger Technology-Based Databases," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, July.
    7. Soukaina Bouarourou & Abderrahim Zannou & El Habib Nfaoui & Abdelhak Boulaalam, 2023. "An Efficient Model-Based Clustering via Joint Multiple Sink Placement for WSNs," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-27, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:317-:d:1244432. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.