IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v10y2021i11p1274-d684036.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on the Evaluation Index System of the Soil Remediation Effect Based on Blockchain

Author

Listed:
  • Menghua Wang

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Xuedong Liang

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

  • Zhi Li

    (Business School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610064, China)

Abstract

Soil remediation technology has achieved good results at present, but evaluation research on the soil remediation effect is relatively lacking. In the field of soil remediation effect evaluation, there are problems such as unscientific and imperfect indices and the inability to guarantee the authenticity of data. Based on the research results of domestic and foreign scholars and the soil remediation standards of some developed countries, a set of recommended indices for soil remediation evaluation has been formed through the analysis and screening of a large number of documents and the results of expert consultation. However, there are phenomena such as lack of data authenticity, information asymmetry, and low supervision efficiency. Based on the technical characteristics of the blockchain and the current soil remediation effect evaluation requirements, combined with the research results of domestic and foreign scholars and the soil remediation standards of some developed countries, the core technology and corresponding application scenarios were analysed for functional requirements in this paper. The introduction of blockchain technology will improve the authenticity of data and form a decentralized, trustworthy, and traceable supervision model. Finally, an evaluation index system of the soil remediation effect based on blockchain was constructed from the following five aspects: collection of soil remediation indices, the addition of a new blockchain-based soil remediation effect evaluation and supervision model, the determination of index weights, a list of soil remediation effect evaluation indices, and providing feedback and suggestions. Through the application of blockchain technology and the innovative addition of the “regional policy” evaluation index, changes and innovations were made in all aspects of the soil remediation effect evaluation process.

Suggested Citation

  • Menghua Wang & Xuedong Liang & Zhi Li, 2021. "Research on the Evaluation Index System of the Soil Remediation Effect Based on Blockchain," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-22, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1274-:d:684036
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1274/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/10/11/1274/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li Tan & Bin Yang & Zhibin Xue & Zhanqi Wang, 2021. "Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination Risk in Soil and Water in the Core Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Ping Li & Tao Wu & Guojun Jiang & Lijie Pu & Yan Li & Jianzhen Zhang & Fei Xu & Xuefeng Xie, 2021. "An Integrated Approach for Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Subtropical Agricultural Soils, Eastern China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Spyros Voulgaris & Nikos Fotiou & Vasilios A. Siris & George C. Polyzos & Mikael Jaatinen & Yannis Oikonomidis, 2019. "Blockchain Technology for Intelligent Environments," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dong Zhao & Huping Hou & Haiya Liu & Chen Wang & Zhongyi Ding & Jinting Xiong, 2023. "Microbial Community Structure and Predictive Functional Analysis in Reclaimed Soil with Different Vegetation Types: The Example of the Xiaoyi Mine Waste Dump in Shanxi," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shams Mhmood Abd Ali & Mohd Najwadi Yusoff & Hasan Falah Hasan, 2023. "Redactable Blockchain: Comprehensive Review, Mechanisms, Challenges, Open Issues and Future Research Directions," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Ahmed Saleh & Yehia H. Dawood & Ahmed Gad, 2022. "Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements’ Contamination in the Soil of Greater Cairo, Egypt Using Geochemical and Magnetic Attributes," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Yu Song & Wenlong Li & Yating Xue & Huakun Zhou & Wenying Wang & Chenli Liu, 2021. "Impact of Industrial Pollution of Cadmium on Traditional Crop Planting Areas and Land Management: A Case Study in Northwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Hui Yang & Liang Zheng & Ying Wang & Jiangfeng Li & Bowen Zhang & Yuzhe Bi, 2022. "Quantifying the Relationship between Land Use Intensity and Ecosystem Services’ Value in the Hanjiang River Basin: A Case Study of the Hubei Section," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-22, September.
    5. Wenbing Luo & Zhongping Deng & Shihu Zhong & Mingjun Deng, 2022. "Trends, Issues and Future Directions of Urban Health Impact Assessment Research: A Systematic Review and Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-23, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:10:y:2021:i:11:p:1274-:d:684036. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.