IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v14y2022i5p135-d805459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bidirectional Trust Model for Service Delegation in Social Internet of Things

Author

Listed:
  • Lijun Wei

    (Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yuhan Yang

    (Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Jing Wu

    (Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Chengnian Long

    (Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China)

  • Yi-Bing Lin

    (Department of Computer Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu 30010, Taiwan
    College of Humanities and Sciences, China Medical University, Taichung 406, Taiwan)

Abstract

As an emerging paradigm of service infrastructure, social internet of things (SIoT) applies the social networking aspects to the internet of things (IoT). Each object in SIoT can establish the social relationship without human intervention, which will enhance the efficiency of interaction among objects, thus boosting the service efficiency. The issue of trust is regarded as an important issue in the development of SIoT. It will influence the object to make decisions about the service delegation. In the current literature, the solutions for the trust issue are always unidirectional, that is, only consider the needs of the service requester to evaluate the trust of service providers. Moreover, the relationship between the service delegation and trust model is still ambiguous. In this paper, we present a bidirectional trust model and construct an explicit approach to address the issue of service delegation based on the trust model. We comprehensively consider the context of the SIoT services or tasks for enhancing the feasibility of our model. The subjective logic is used for trust quantification and we design two optimized operators for opinion convergence. Finally, the proposed trust model and trust-based service delegation method are validated through a series of numerical tests.

Suggested Citation

  • Lijun Wei & Yuhan Yang & Jing Wu & Chengnian Long & Yi-Bing Lin, 2022. "A Bidirectional Trust Model for Service Delegation in Social Internet of Things," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:135-:d:805459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/5/135/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/14/5/135/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shancang Li & Li Da Xu & Shanshan Zhao, 2015. "The internet of things: a survey," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 243-259, April.
    2. Kashif Zia & Muhammad Shafi & Umar Farooq, 2020. "Improving Recommendation Accuracy Using Social Network of Owners in Social Internet of Vehicles," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Christoph Stach, 2022. "Special Issue on Security and Privacy in Blockchains and the IoT," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-4, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    3. Waleed Al-Zaidi & Farsat Shaban & Dilgash Qadir M., 2022. "Internet of Things in Enhancing Competitive Capabilities: An Exploratory Study," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 25-32, January.
    4. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2018. "The Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey of Topics and Trends using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190376, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Qinghua Zheng & Chutong Yang & Haijun Yang & Jianhe Zhou, 2020. "A Fast Exact Algorithm for Deployment of Sensor Nodes for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 829-842, August.
    6. Joseph Chambers & James Evans, 2020. "Informal urbanism and the Internet of Things: Reliability, trust and the reconfiguration of infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2918-2935, November.
    7. Damminda Alahakoon & Rashmika Nawaratne & Yan Xu & Daswin Silva & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Bhumika Gupta, 2023. "Self-Building Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Empower Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 221-240, February.
    8. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    9. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    10. Michaela Sprenger & Tobias Mettler & Robert Winter, 0. "A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    11. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    12. Gergely Marcell Honti & Janos Abonyi, 2019. "A Review of Semantic Sensor Technologies in Internet of Things Architectures," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, June.
    13. Payam Hanafizadeh & Parastou Hatami & Morteza Analoui & Amir Albadvi, 2021. "Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business context," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1175-1243, December.
    14. Humphrey M. Sabi & Faith-Michael E. Uzoka & Kehbuma Langmia & Felix N. Njeh & Clive K. Tsuma, 0. "A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    15. Federica Cena & Luca Console & Assunta Matassa & Ilaria Torre, 2019. "Multi-dimensional intelligence in smart physical objects," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 383-404, April.
    16. Muhammad Ilyas & Zahid Ullah & Fakhri Alam Khan & Muhammad Hasanain Chaudary & Muhammad Sheraz Arshed Malik & Zafar Zaheer & Hamood Ur Rehman Durrani, 2020. "Trust-based energy-efficient routing protocol for Internet of things–based sensor networks," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(10), pages 15501477209, October.
    17. Oscar Brousse & Charles H. Simpson & Ate Poorthuis & Clare Heaviside, 2024. "Unequal distributions of crowdsourced weather data in England and Wales," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    18. Pan Wang & Ricardo Valerdi & Shangming Zhou & Ling Li, 2015. "Introduction: Advances in IoT research and applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 239-241, April.
    19. Shang, Juan & Li, Pengfei & Li, Ling & Chen, Yong, 2018. "The relationship between population growth and capital allocation in urbanization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 249-256.
    20. Jens Passlick & Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Lukas Grützner & Dennis Eilers & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 67-87, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:14:y:2022:i:5:p:135-:d:805459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.