IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/intdis/v16y2020i10p1550147720964358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trust-based energy-efficient routing protocol for Internet of things–based sensor networks

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Ilyas
  • Zahid Ullah
  • Fakhri Alam Khan
  • Muhammad Hasanain Chaudary
  • Muhammad Sheraz Arshed Malik
  • Zafar Zaheer
  • Hamood Ur Rehman Durrani

Abstract

Internet of things grew swiftly and many services, software, sensors-embedded electronic devices and related protocols were developed and still in progress with full swing. Internet of things enabling physically existing things to see, hear, think and perform a notable task by allowing them to talk to each other and share useful information while making decision and caring-on/out their important tasks. Internet of things is greatly promoted by wireless sensor network as it becomes a perpetual layer for it. Wireless sensor network works as a base-stone for most of the Internet of things applications. There are severe general and specific threats and technical challenges to Internet of things–based sensor networks which must overcome to ensure adaptation and diffusion of it. Most of the limitations of wireless sensor networks are due to its resource constraint objects nature. The specified open research challenges in Internet of things–based sensor network are power consumption, network lifespan, network throughput, routing and network security. To overcome aforementioned problems, this work aimed to prolong network lifetime, improve throughput, decrease packet latency/packet loss and further improvise in encountering malicious nodes. To further tune the network lifetime in terms of energy, wireless harvesting energy is suggested in proposed three-layer cluster-based wireless sensor network routing protocol. The proposed mechanism is a three-tier clustering technique with implanted security mechanism to encounter malicious activities of sensor nodes and to slant them into blacklist. It is a centred-based clustering protocol, where selection of cluster head and grid head is carried out by sink node based on the value of its cost function. Moreover, hardware-based link quality estimators are used to check link effectiveness and to further improve routing efficiency. At the end, excessive experiments have been carried out to check efficacy of the proposed protocol. It outperforms most of its counterpart protocols such as fuzzy logic–based unequal clustering and ant colony optimization–based routing hybrid, Artificial Bee Colony-SD, enhanced three-layer hybrid clustering mechanism and energy aware multi-hop routing in terms of network lifetime, network throughput, average energy consumption and packet latency.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Ilyas & Zahid Ullah & Fakhri Alam Khan & Muhammad Hasanain Chaudary & Muhammad Sheraz Arshed Malik & Zafar Zaheer & Hamood Ur Rehman Durrani, 2020. "Trust-based energy-efficient routing protocol for Internet of things–based sensor networks," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(10), pages 15501477209, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:10:p:1550147720964358
    DOI: 10.1177/1550147720964358
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1550147720964358
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1550147720964358?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Amin Shahraki & Marjan Kuchaki Rafsanjani & Arsham Borumand Saeid, 2017. "Hierarchical distributed management clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 65(1), pages 193-214, May.
    2. Shancang Li & Li Da Xu & Shanshan Zhao, 2015. "The internet of things: a survey," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 243-259, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    2. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    3. Waleed Al-Zaidi & Farsat Shaban & Dilgash Qadir M., 2022. "Internet of Things in Enhancing Competitive Capabilities: An Exploratory Study," International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 8(2), pages 25-32, January.
    4. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2018. "The Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey of Topics and Trends using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190376, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    5. Qinghua Zheng & Chutong Yang & Haijun Yang & Jianhe Zhou, 2020. "A Fast Exact Algorithm for Deployment of Sensor Nodes for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 829-842, August.
    6. Joseph Chambers & James Evans, 2020. "Informal urbanism and the Internet of Things: Reliability, trust and the reconfiguration of infrastructure," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(14), pages 2918-2935, November.
    7. Damminda Alahakoon & Rashmika Nawaratne & Yan Xu & Daswin Silva & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Bhumika Gupta, 2023. "Self-Building Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Empower Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 221-240, February.
    8. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    9. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    10. Michaela Sprenger & Tobias Mettler & Robert Winter, 0. "A viability theory for digital businesses: Exploring the evolutionary changes of revenue mechanisms to support managerial decisions," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    11. Masoud Zafarzadeh & Magnus Wiktorsson & Jannicke Baalsrud Hauge, 2021. "A Systematic Review on Technologies for Data-Driven Production Logistics: Their Role from a Holistic and Value Creation Perspective," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 5(2), pages 1-32, April.
    12. Gergely Marcell Honti & Janos Abonyi, 2019. "A Review of Semantic Sensor Technologies in Internet of Things Architectures," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-21, June.
    13. Payam Hanafizadeh & Parastou Hatami & Morteza Analoui & Amir Albadvi, 2021. "Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business context," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1175-1243, December.
    14. Humphrey M. Sabi & Faith-Michael E. Uzoka & Kehbuma Langmia & Felix N. Njeh & Clive K. Tsuma, 0. "A cross-country model of contextual factors impacting cloud computing adoption at universities in sub-Saharan Africa," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-24.
    15. Federica Cena & Luca Console & Assunta Matassa & Ilaria Torre, 2019. "Multi-dimensional intelligence in smart physical objects," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 383-404, April.
    16. Oscar Brousse & Charles H. Simpson & Ate Poorthuis & Clare Heaviside, 2024. "Unequal distributions of crowdsourced weather data in England and Wales," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Pan Wang & Ricardo Valerdi & Shangming Zhou & Ling Li, 2015. "Introduction: Advances in IoT research and applications," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 239-241, April.
    18. Shang, Juan & Li, Pengfei & Li, Ling & Chen, Yong, 2018. "The relationship between population growth and capital allocation in urbanization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 249-256.
    19. Jens Passlick & Sonja Dreyer & Daniel Olivotti & Lukas Grützner & Dennis Eilers & Michael H. Breitner, 2021. "Predictive maintenance as an internet of things enabled business model: A taxonomy," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 31(1), pages 67-87, March.
    20. Salvatore T. March & Gary D. Scudder, 2019. "Predictive maintenance: strategic use of IT in manufacturing organizations," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 327-341, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:intdis:v:16:y:2020:i:10:p:1550147720964358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.