IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i8p202-d607384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Education 4.0: Teaching the Basis of Motor Imagery Classification Algorithms for Brain-Computer Interfaces

Author

Listed:
  • David Balderas

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey National Department of Research, Puente 222, Del. Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Pedro Ponce

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey National Department of Research, Puente 222, Del. Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Diego Lopez-Bernal

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey National Department of Research, Puente 222, Del. Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

  • Arturo Molina

    (Tecnologico de Monterrey National Department of Research, Puente 222, Del. Tlalpan, Mexico City 14380, Mexico)

Abstract

Education 4.0 is looking to prepare future scientists and engineers not only by granting them with knowledge and skills but also by giving them the ability to apply them to solve real life problems through the implementation of disruptive technologies. As a consequence, there is a growing demand for educational material that introduces science and engineering students to technologies, such as Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Brain–Computer Interfaces (BCI). Thus, our contribution towards the development of this material is to create a test bench for BCI given the basis and analysis on how they can be discriminated against. This is shown using different AI methods: Fisher Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Restricted Boltzmann Machines (RBM) and Self-Organizing Maps (SOM), allowing students to see how input changes alter their performance. These tests were done against a two-class Motor Image database. First, using a large frequency band and no filtering eye movement. Secondly, the band was reduced and the eye movement was filtered. The accuracy was analyzed obtaining values around 70∼80% for all methods, excluding SVM and SOM mapping. Accuracy and mapping differentiability increased for some subjects for the second scenario 70∼85%, meaning either their band with the most significant information is on that limited space or the contamination because of eye movement was better mitigated by the regression method. This can be translated to saying that these methods work better under limited spaces. The outcome of this work is useful to show future scientists and engineers how BCI experiments are conducted while teaching them the basics of some AI techniques that can be used in this and other several experiments that can be carried on the framework of Education 4.0.

Suggested Citation

  • David Balderas & Pedro Ponce & Diego Lopez-Bernal & Arturo Molina, 2021. "Education 4.0: Teaching the Basis of Motor Imagery Classification Algorithms for Brain-Computer Interfaces," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-27, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:202-:d:607384
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/8/202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/8/202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leigh R. Hochberg & Daniel Bacher & Beata Jarosiewicz & Nicolas Y. Masse & John D. Simeral & Joern Vogel & Sami Haddadin & Jie Liu & Sydney S. Cash & Patrick van der Smagt & John P. Donoghue, 2012. "Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm," Nature, Nature, vol. 485(7398), pages 372-375, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrey Eliseyev & Tetiana Aksenova, 2016. "Penalized Multi-Way Partial Least Squares for Smooth Trajectory Decoding from Electrocorticographic (ECoG) Recording," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Ujwal Chaudhary & Bin Xia & Stefano Silvoni & Leonardo G Cohen & Niels Birbaumer, 2017. "Brain–Computer Interface–Based Communication in the Completely Locked-In State," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Keundong Lee & Angelique C. Paulk & Yun Goo Ro & Daniel R. Cleary & Karen J. Tonsfeldt & Yoav Kfir & John S. Pezaris & Youngbin Tchoe & Jihwan Lee & Andrew M. Bourhis & Ritwik Vatsyayan & Joel R. Mart, 2024. "Flexible, scalable, high channel count stereo-electrode for recording in the human brain," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    4. Baoguo Xu & Wenlong Li & Deping Liu & Kun Zhang & Minmin Miao & Guozheng Xu & Aiguo Song, 2022. "Continuous Hybrid BCI Control for Robotic Arm Using Noninvasive Electroencephalogram, Computer Vision, and Eye Tracking," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Fan Li & Jazlyn Gallego & Natasha N. Tirko & Jenna Greaser & Derek Bashe & Rudra Patel & Eric Shaker & Grace E. Valkenburg & Alanoud S. Alsubhi & Steven Wellman & Vanshika Singh & Camila Garcia Padill, 2024. "Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) modulates microglial activation following intracortical microelectrode implantation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Xiao-yu Sun & Bin Ye, 2023. "The functional differentiation of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) and its ethical implications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    7. Eric A Pohlmeyer & Babak Mahmoudi & Shijia Geng & Noeline W Prins & Justin C Sanchez, 2014. "Using Reinforcement Learning to Provide Stable Brain-Machine Interface Control Despite Neural Input Reorganization," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, January.
    8. Josh Merel & David Carlson & Liam Paninski & John P Cunningham, 2016. "Neuroprosthetic Decoder Training as Imitation Learning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Betz, Ulrich A.K. & Arora, Loukik & Assal, Reem A. & Azevedo, Hatylas & Baldwin, Jeremy & Becker, Michael S. & Bostock, Stefan & Cheng, Vinton & Egle, Tobias & Ferrari, Nicola & Schneider-Futschik, El, 2023. "Game changers in science and technology - now and beyond," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    10. Andrés Úbeda & Enrique Hortal & Eduardo Iáñez & Carlos Perez-Vidal & Jose M Azorín, 2015. "Assessing Movement Factors in Upper Limb Kinematics Decoding from EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(5), pages 1-12, May.
    11. Fuji Ren & Yanwei Bao, 2020. "A Review on Human-Computer Interaction and Intelligent Robots," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 5-47, February.
    12. Han-Lin Hsieh & Maryam M Shanechi, 2018. "Optimizing the learning rate for adaptive estimation of neural encoding models," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-34, May.
    13. Elisa Donati & Giacomo Valle, 2024. "Neuromorphic hardware for somatosensory neuroprostheses," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    14. Javier M Antelis & Luis Montesano & Ander Ramos-Murguialday & Niels Birbaumer & Javier Minguez, 2013. "On the Usage of Linear Regression Models to Reconstruct Limb Kinematics from Low Frequency EEG Signals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(4), pages 1-14, April.
    15. Xiangjing Wang & Chunsheng Chen & Li Zhu & Kailu Shi & Baocheng Peng & Yixin Zhu & Huiwu Mao & Haotian Long & Shuo Ke & Chuanyu Fu & Ying Zhu & Changjin Wan & Qing Wan, 2023. "Vertically integrated spiking cone photoreceptor arrays for color perception," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-9, December.
    16. Jonathan A Michaels & Benjamin Dann & Hansjörg Scherberger, 2016. "Neural Population Dynamics during Reaching Are Better Explained by a Dynamical System than Representational Tuning," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-22, November.
    17. Hong Gi Yeom & June Sic Kim & Chun Kee Chung, 2014. "High-Accuracy Brain-Machine Interfaces Using Feedback Information," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(7), pages 1-7, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:8:p:202-:d:607384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.