IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v13y2021i5p127-d553217.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

User Acceptance of Smart Watch for Medical Purposes: An Empirical Study

Author

Listed:
  • Rana Saeed Al-Maroof

    (English Language & Linguistics Department, Al Buraimi University College, Al Buraimi 512, Oman)

  • Khadija Alhumaid

    (College of Education, Zayed University, Abu Dhabi P.O. Box 19282, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ahmad Qasim Alhamad

    (Information Systems Department, University of Sharjah, Sharjah P.O. Box 26666, United Arab Emirates)

  • Ahmad Aburayya

    (Quality & Corporate Development Office, Dubai Health Authority, Dubai 9115, United Arab Emirates)

  • Said Salloum

    (School of Science, Engineering, and Environment, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK
    Machine Learning and NLP Research Group, University of Sharjah, Sharjah 27272, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the most effective and interesting variables that urge use of the smartwatch (SW) in a medical environment. To achieve this aim, the study was framed using an innovative and integrated research model, which is based on combining constructs from a well-established theoretical model’s TAM and other features that are critical to the effectiveness of SW which are content richness and personal innovativeness. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) is used to detect the determinants affecting the adoption of SW. The current study depends on an online questionnaire that is composed of (20) items. The questionnaire is distributed among a group of doctors, nurses, and administration staff in medical centers within the UAE. The total number of respondents is (325). The collected data were implemented to test the study model and the proposed constructs and hypotheses depending on the Smart PLS Software. The results of the current study show that the main constructs in the model contribute differently to the acceptance of SW. Based on the previous assumption, content richness and innovativeness are critical factors that enrich the user’s perceived usefulness. In addition, perceived ease of use was significantly predictive of either perceived usefulness or behavioral intention. Overall findings suggest that SW is in high demand in the medical field and is used as a common channel among doctors and their patients and it facilitates the role of transmitting information among its users. The outcomes of the current study indicate the importance of certain external factors for the acceptance of the technology. The genuine value of this study lies in the fact that it is based on a conceptual framework that emphasizes the close relationship between the TAM constructs of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use to the construct of content richness, and innovativeness. Finally, this study helps us recognize the embedded motives for using SW in a medical environment, where the main motive is to enhance and facilitate the effective roles of doctors and patients.

Suggested Citation

  • Rana Saeed Al-Maroof & Khadija Alhumaid & Ahmad Qasim Alhamad & Ahmad Aburayya & Said Salloum, 2021. "User Acceptance of Smart Watch for Medical Purposes: An Empirical Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:127-:d:553217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/5/127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/13/5/127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    2. Kieran Mathieson, 1991. "Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(3), pages 173-191, September.
    3. Patricia Baudier & Chantal Ammi & Samuel Fosso Wamba, 2020. "Differing perceptions of the Smartwatch by users within developed countries," Post-Print hal-02512543, HAL.
    4. Hamed Taherdoost, 2018. "A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories," Post-Print hal-03741843, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ruhi Kiran Bajaj & Rebecca Mary Meiring & Fernando Beltran, 2023. "Co-Design, Development, and Evaluation of a Health Monitoring Tool Using Smartwatch Data: A Proof-of-Concept Study," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hamed Taherdoost, 2019. "Importance of Technology Acceptance Assessment for Successful Implementation and Development of New Technologies," Post-Print hal-02557395, HAL.
    2. Hamed Taherdoost, 2021. "Importance of Technology Acceptance Assessment for Successful Implementation and Development of New Technologies," Post-Print hal-03741844, HAL.
    3. Hasan, Rajibul & Lowe, Ben & Petrovici, Dan, 2020. "Consumer adoption of pro-poor service innovations in subsistence marketplaces," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 461-475.
    4. Issa Mohamed Al Dafaei & Zurida Ismail & Mohd Ali Samsudin & Firas Jalal Shakir, 2013. "The Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy towards the Relationship Between Attitudes And Level of Use Towards Instructional Computer Technology in Oman," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 3(12), pages 2382-2398, December.
    5. Cristopher Siegfried Kopplin, 2021. "Two heads are better than one: matchmaking tools in coworking spaces," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 1045-1069, May.
    6. Venkatesh, Viswanath & Maruping, Likoebe M. & Brown, Susan A., 2006. "Role of time in self-prediction of behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 160-176, July.
    7. Garima Malik & A. Sajeevan Rao, 2019. "Extended expectation-confirmation model to predict continued usage of ODR/ride hailing apps: role of perceived value and self-efficacy," Information Technology & Tourism, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 461-482, December.
    8. Karim, Sitara & Naz, Farah & Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Vigne, Samuel A., 2022. "Is FinTech providing effective solutions to Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) in ASEAN countries?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 335-344.
    9. Nistor, Cristian, 2013. "A conceptual model for the use of social media in companies," MPRA Paper 44224, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Francisco Rejón-Guardia & Juán Sánchez-Fernández & Francisco Muñoz-Leiva, 2011. "Motivational Factors that influence the Acceptance of Microblogging Social Networks: The µBAM Model," FEG Working Paper Series 06/11, Faculty of Economics and Business (University of Granada).
    11. Kawsar Ahmad & Arifuzzaman Arifuzzaman & Abdullah Al Mamun & Junayed Md Khaled Bin Oalid, 2021. "Impact of consumer’s security, benefits and usefulness towards cashless transaction within Malaysian university student," International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478), Center for the Strategic Studies in Business and Finance, vol. 10(2), pages 238-250, March.
    12. Muhammad Ali & Syed Ali Raza & Chin-Hong Puah & Mohd Zaini Abd Karim, 2017. "Islamic home financing in Pakistan: a SEM-based approach using modified TPB model," Housing Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(8), pages 1156-1177, November.
    13. Raghavendra Prasanna Kumar & Arindam Banerjee & Zahran Al-Salti & S. Ananda, 2024. "Technology acceptance model and customer engagement: mediating role of customer satisfaction," Journal of Financial Services Marketing, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(3), pages 1062-1076, September.
    14. Rahman Ummeh Habiba Faria Benteh & Zafar Muhammad Khubaib, 2020. "Factors Influencing Uber Adoption In Bangladesh And Pakistan," Open Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 86-97, January.
    15. Chi-Yo Huang & Hui-Ya Wang & Chia-Lee Yang & Steven J. H. Shiau, 2020. "A Derivation of Factors Influencing the Diffusion and Adoption of an Open Source Learning Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    16. Keen, C. & Wetzels, M., 2001. "Exploring the Preference Structure for Online and Traditional Retail Formats," Working Papers 01.18, Eindhoven Center for Innovation Studies.
    17. Robinson, Leroy Jr. & Marshall, Greg W. & Stamps, Miriam B., 2005. "Sales force use of technology: antecedents to technology acceptance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 58(12), pages 1623-1631, December.
    18. Müller-Seitz, Gordon & Dautzenberg, Kirsti & Creusen, Utho & Stromereder, Christine, 2009. "Customer acceptance of RFID technology: Evidence from the German electronic retail sector," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 31-39.
    19. Minseok Choi & Kyeongseok Han & Jeongil Choi, 2015. "The effects of product attributes and service quality of transportation card solutions on service user’s continuance and word-of-mouth intention," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 9(3), pages 463-490, September.
    20. Funmilola Omotayo & Oluwatobi Dahunsi, 2015. "Factors Affecting Adoption of Point of Sale Terminals by Business Organisations in Nigeria," International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, Human Resource Management Academic Research Society, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 5(10), pages 115-137, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:127-:d:553217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.