IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jforec/v4y2022i4p52-968d982440.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematic Assessment of the Effects of Space Averaging and Time Averaging on Weather Forecast Skill

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Li

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Samuel N. Stechmann

    (Department of Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

Intuitively, one would expect a more skillful forecast if predicting weather averaged over one week instead of the weather averaged over one day, and similarly for different spatial averaging areas. However, there are few systematic studies of averaging and forecast skill with modern forecasts, and it is therefore not clear how much improvement in forecast performance is produced via averaging. Here we present a direct investigation of averaging effects, based on data from operational numerical weather forecasts. Data is analyzed for precipitation and surface temperature, for lead times of roughly 1 to 7 days, and for time- and space-averaging diameters of 1 to 7 days and 100 to 4500 km, respectively. For different geographic locations, the effects of time- or space-averaging can be different, and while no clear geographical pattern is seen for precipitation, a clear spatial pattern is seen for temperature. For temperature, in general, time averaging is most effective near coastlines, also effective over land, and least effective over oceans. Based on all locations globally, time averaging was less effective than one might expect. To help understand why time averaging may sometimes be minimally effective, a stochastic model is analyzed as a synthetic weather time series, and analytical formulas are presented for the decorrelation time. In effect, while time averaging creates a time series that is visually smoother, it does not necessarily cause a substantial increase in the predictability of the time series.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Li & Samuel N. Stechmann, 2022. "Systematic Assessment of the Effects of Space Averaging and Time Averaging on Weather Forecast Skill," Forecasting, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-20, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:52-968:d:982440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/4/52/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9394/4/4/52/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Bauer & Alan Thorpe & Gilbert Brunet, 2015. "The quiet revolution of numerical weather prediction," Nature, Nature, vol. 525(7567), pages 47-55, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Linsenmeier, Manuel & Shrader, Jeffrey G., 2023. "Global inequalities in weather forecasts," SocArXiv 7e2jf, Center for Open Science.
    2. Jinhua Wen & Yian Hua & Chenkai Cai & Shiwu Wang & Helong Wang & Xinyan Zhou & Jian Huang & Jianqun Wang, 2023. "Probabilistic Forecast and Risk Assessment of Flash Droughts Based on Numeric Weather Forecast: A Case Study in Zhejiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Mayer, Martin János & Yang, Dazhi, 2023. "Calibration of deterministic NWP forecasts and its impact on verification," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 981-991.
    4. Anand, Vaibhav, 2022. "The Value of Forecast Improvements: Evidence from Advisory Lead Times and Vehicle Crashes," MPRA Paper 114491, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Chuyuan Lin & Ying Yu & Lucas Y. Wu & Jiguo Cao, 2023. "Unsupervised learning on U.S. weather forecast performance," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1193-1213, September.
    6. Liu, Bai & Yang, Dazhi & Mayer, Martin János & Coimbra, Carlos F.M. & Kleissl, Jan & Kay, Merlinde & Wang, Wenting & Bright, Jamie M. & Xia, Xiang’ao & Lv, Xin & Srinivasan, Dipti & Wu, Yan & Beyer, H, 2023. "Predictability and forecast skill of solar irradiance over the contiguous United States," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Liu, Jiarui & Fu, Yuchen, 2023. "Renewable energy forecasting: A self-supervised learning-based transformer variant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    8. Husain Najafi & Pallav Kumar Shrestha & Oldrich Rakovec & Heiko Apel & Sergiy Vorogushyn & Rohini Kumar & Stephan Thober & Bruno Merz & Luis Samaniego, 2024. "High-resolution impact-based early warning system for riverine flooding," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    9. Meng, Xiaochun & Taylor, James W., 2022. "Comparing probabilistic forecasts of the daily minimum and maximum temperature," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 267-281.
    10. Tang, Wenliang & Yang, Mian & Duan, Hongbo, 2023. "Temperature and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Wang, Xiaoqian & Hyndman, Rob J. & Li, Feng & Kang, Yanfei, 2023. "Forecast combinations: An over 50-year review," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1518-1547.
    12. Zack Guido & Sara Lopus & Kurt Waldman & Corrie Hannah & Andrew Zimmer & Natasha Krell & Chris Knudson & Lyndon Estes & Kelly Caylor & Tom Evans, 2021. "Perceived links between climate change and weather forecast accuracy: new barriers to tools for agricultural decision-making," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 168(1), pages 1-20, September.
    13. Sergei Soldatenko & Rafael Yusupov, 2021. "An Optimal Control Perspective on Weather and Climate Modification," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-15, February.
    14. Yakoub, Ghali & Mathew, Sathyajith & Leal, Joao, 2023. "Intelligent estimation of wind farm performance with direct and indirect ‘point’ forecasting approaches integrating several NWP models," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PD).
    15. Patrick Schmidt & Matthias Katzfuss & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Interpretation of point forecasts with unknown directive," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 36(6), pages 728-743, September.
    16. Liu, Chenyu & Zhang, Xuemin & Mei, Shengwei & Zhen, Zhao & Jia, Mengshuo & Li, Zheng & Tang, Haiyan, 2022. "Numerical weather prediction enhanced wind power forecasting: Rank ensemble and probabilistic fluctuation awareness," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    17. Yang, Dazhi & Kleissl, Jan, 2023. "Summarizing ensemble NWP forecasts for grid operators: Consistency, elicitability, and economic value," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 1640-1654.
    18. Alexander Henzi & Johanna F. Ziegel & Tilmann Gneiting, 2021. "Isotonic distributional regression," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 963-993, November.
    19. Boris V. Malozyomov & Nikita V. Martyushev & Svetlana N. Sorokova & Egor A. Efremenkov & Denis V. Valuev & Mengxu Qi, 2024. "Analysis of a Predictive Mathematical Model of Weather Changes Based on Neural Networks," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.
    20. Karma Tsering & Manish Shrestha & Kiran Shakya & Birendra Bajracharya & Mir Matin & Jorge Luis Sanchez Lozano & Jim Nelson & Tandin Wangchuk & Binod Parajuli & Md Arifuzzaman Bhuyan, 2022. "Verification of two hydrological models for real-time flood forecasting in the Hindu Kush Himalaya (HKH) region," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(3), pages 1821-1845, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jforec:v:4:y:2022:i:4:p:52-968:d:982440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.