IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i11p885-d81648.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exergy and Thermoeconomic Analyses of Central Receiver Concentrated Solar Plants Using Air as Heat Transfer Fluid

Author

Listed:
  • Claudia Toro

    (CNR Institute of Environmental Geology and Geoengineering, c/o Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome 00184, Italy)

  • Matteo V. Rocco

    (Politecnico di Milano, Milan 20156, Italy)

  • Emanuela Colombo

    (Politecnico di Milano, Milan 20156, Italy)

Abstract

The latest developments in solar technologies demonstrated that the solar central receiver configuration is the most promising application among concentrated solar power (CSP) plants. In CSPs solar-heated air can be used as the working fluid in a Brayton thermal cycle and as the heat transfer fluid for a Rankine thermal cycle as an alternative to more traditional working fluids thereby reducing maintenance operations and providing the power section with a higher degree of flexibility To supply thermal needs when the solar source is unavailable, an auxiliary burner is requested. This configuration is adopted in the Julich CSP (J-CSP) plant, operating in Germany and characterized by a nominal power of 1.5 MW, the heat transfer fluid (HTF) is air which is heated in the solar tower and used to produce steam for the bottoming Rankine cycle. In this paper, the J-CSP plant with thermal energy storage has been compared with a hybrid CSP plant (H-CSP) using air as the working fluid. Thermodynamic and economic performances of all the simulated plants have been evaluated by applying both exergy analysis and thermoeconomic analysis (TA) to determine the yearly average operation at nominal conditions. The exergy destructions and structure as well as the exergoeconomic costs of products have been derived for all the components of the plants. Based on the obtained results, the thermoeconomic design evaluation and optimization of the plants has been performed, allowing for improvement of the thermodynamic and economic efficiency of the systems as well as decreasing the exergy and exergoeconomic cost of their products.

Suggested Citation

  • Claudia Toro & Matteo V. Rocco & Emanuela Colombo, 2016. "Exergy and Thermoeconomic Analyses of Central Receiver Concentrated Solar Plants Using Air as Heat Transfer Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-17, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:11:p:885-:d:81648
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/11/885/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/11/885/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    2. Viebahn, Peter & Lechon, Yolanda & Trieb, Franz, 2011. "The potential role of concentrated solar power (CSP) in Africa and Europe--A dynamic assessment of technology development, cost development and life cycle inventories until 2050," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 4420-4430, August.
    3. Spelling, James & Favrat, Daniel & Martin, Andrew & Augsburger, Germain, 2012. "Thermoeconomic optimization of a combined-cycle solar tower power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 113-120.
    4. Wei, Xiudong & Lu, Zhenwu & Wang, Zhifeng & Yu, Weixing & Zhang, Hongxing & Yao, Zhihao, 2010. "A new method for the design of the heliostat field layout for solar tower power plant," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1970-1975.
    5. Valero, Antonio & Lozano, Miguel A. & Serra, Luis & Tsatsaronis, George & Pisa, Javier & Frangopoulos, Christos & von Spakovsky, Michael R., 1994. "CGAM problem: Definition and conventional solution," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 279-286.
    6. Piacentino, Antonio & Cardona, Ennio, 2010. "Scope Oriented Thermoeconomic analysis of energy systems. Part II: Formation Structure of Optimality for robust design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 957-970, March.
    7. Yao, Zhihao & Wang, Zhifeng & Lu, Zhenwu & Wei, Xiudong, 2009. "Modeling and simulation of the pioneer 1MW solar thermal central receiver system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2437-2446.
    8. Abusoglu, Aysegul & Kanoglu, Mehmet, 2009. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of combined heat and power production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(9), pages 2295-2308, December.
    9. Rovira, Antonio & Barbero, Rubén & Montes, María José & Abbas, Rubén & Varela, Fernando, 2016. "Analysis and comparison of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles using parabolic troughs and linear Fresnel reflectors as concentrating systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 990-1000.
    10. Rocco, M.V. & Colombo, E. & Sciubba, E., 2014. "Advances in exergy analysis: a novel assessment of the Extended Exergy Accounting method," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1405-1420.
    11. Fernández-García, A. & Zarza, E. & Valenzuela, L. & Pérez, M., 2010. "Parabolic-trough solar collectors and their applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(7), pages 1695-1721, September.
    12. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.
    13. Usón, Sergio & Valero, Antonio & Agudelo, Andrés, 2012. "Thermoeconomics and Industrial Symbiosis. Effect of by-product integration in cost assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 43-51.
    14. Rivero, Ricardo & Rendón, Consuelo & Gallegos, Salvador, 2004. "Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a crude oil combined distillation unit," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(12), pages 1909-1927.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Barbara Mendecka & Lidia Lombardi & Paweł Gładysz & Wojciech Stanek, 2018. "Exergo-Ecological Assessment of Waste to Energy Plants Supported by Solar Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, March.
    2. Dan-Adrian Mocanu & Viorel Bădescu & Ciprian Bucur & Iuliana Ștefan & Elena Carcadea & Maria Simona Răboacă & Ioana Manta, 2020. "PLC Automation and Control Strategy in a Stirling Solar Power System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Pratticò, Luca & Fronza, Nicola & Bartali, Ruben & Chiappini, Andrea & Sciubba, Enrico & González-Aguilar, J. & Crema, Luigi, 2021. "Radiation propagation in a hierarchical solar volumetric absorber: Results of single-photon avalanche diode measurements and Monte Carlo ray tracing analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 482-493.
    4. Maria Simona Răboacă & Gheorghe Badea & Adrian Enache & Constantin Filote & Gabriel Răsoi & Mihai Rata & Alexandru Lavric & Raluca-Andreea Felseghi, 2019. "Concentrating Solar Power Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Gómez-Hernández, J. & González-Gómez, P.A. & Briongos, J.V. & Santana, D., 2018. "Influence of the steam generator on the exergetic and exergoeconomic analysis of solar tower plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 313-328.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Saghafifar, Mohammad & Gadalla, Mohamed, 2016. "Thermo-economic analysis of air bottoming cycle hybridization using heliostat field collector: A comparative analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 698-714.
    2. Okoroigwe, Edmund & Madhlopa, Amos, 2016. "An integrated combined cycle system driven by a solar tower: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 337-350.
    3. Collado, Francisco J. & Guallar, Jesús, 2013. "A review of optimized design layouts for solar power tower plants with campo code," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 142-154.
    4. Siva Reddy, V. & Kaushik, S.C. & Ranjan, K.R. & Tyagi, S.K., 2013. "State-of-the-art of solar thermal power plants—A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 258-273.
    5. Atif, Maimoon. & Al-Sulaiman, Fahad A., 2017. "Energy and exergy analyses of solar tower power plant driven supercritical carbon dioxide recompression cycles for six different locations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 153-167.
    6. Rovira, Antonio & Abbas, Rubén & Sánchez, Consuelo & Muñoz, Marta, 2020. "Proposal and analysis of an integrated solar combined cycle with partial recuperation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Wei, Xiudong & Lu, Zhenwu & Yu, Weixing & Zhang, Hongxin & Wang, Zhifeng, 2011. "Tracking and ray tracing equations for the target-aligned heliostat for solar tower power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(10), pages 2687-2693.
    8. Mostafavi Tehrani, S. Saeed & Taylor, Robert A., 2016. "Off-design simulation and performance of molten salt cavity receivers in solar tower plants under realistic operational modes and control strategies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 698-715.
    9. Colombo, Emanuela & Rocco, Matteo V. & Toro, Claudia & Sciubba, Enrico, 2015. "An exergy-based approach to the joint economic and environmental impact assessment of possible photovoltaic scenarios: A case study at a regional level in Italy," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 318(C), pages 64-74.
    10. Wang, Kun & He, Ya-Ling & Qiu, Yu & Zhang, Yuwen, 2016. "A novel integrated simulation approach couples MCRT and Gebhart methods to simulate solar radiation transfer in a solar power tower system with a cavity receiver," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 93-107.
    11. Usón, Sergio & Kostowski, Wojciech J. & Stanek, Wojciech & Gazda, Wiesław, 2015. "Thermoecological cost of electricity, heat and cold generated in a trigeneration module fuelled with selected fossil and renewable fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 308-319.
    12. Amani, Madjid & Ghenaiet, Adel, 2020. "Novel hybridization of solar central receiver system with combined cycle power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Xie, Qiyue & Guo, Ziqi & Liu, Daifei & Chen, Zhisheng & Shen, Zhongli & Wang, Xiaoli, 2021. "Optimization of heliostat field distribution based on improved Gray Wolf optimization algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 447-458.
    14. Kevin Ellingwood & Seyed Mostafa Safdarnejad & Khalid Rashid & Kody Powell, 2018. "Leveraging Energy Storage in a Solar-Tower and Combined Cycle Hybrid Power Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-23, December.
    15. Malagueta, Diego & Szklo, Alexandre & Borba, Bruno Soares Moreira Cesar & Soria, Rafael & Aragão, Raymundo & Schaeffer, Roberto & Dutra, Ricardo, 2013. "Assessing incentive policies for integrating centralized solar power generation in the Brazilian electric power system," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 198-212.
    16. Soria, Rafael & Portugal-Pereira, Joana & Szklo, Alexandre & Milani, Rodrigo & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2015. "Hybrid concentrated solar power (CSP)–biomass plants in a semiarid region: A strategy for CSP deployment in Brazil," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 57-72.
    17. Pantaleo, Antonio M. & Camporeale, Sergio M. & Miliozzi, Adio & Russo, Valeria & Shah, Nilay & Markides, Christos N., 2017. "Novel hybrid CSP-biomass CHP for flexible generation: Thermo-economic analysis and profitability assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 994-1006.
    18. Marta Muñoz & Antonio Rovira & María José Montes, 2022. "Thermodynamic cycles for solar thermal power plants: A review," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), March.
    19. Islam, Md Tasbirul & Huda, Nazmul & Abdullah, A.B. & Saidur, R., 2018. "A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 987-1018.
    20. Stanek, Wojciech & Gazda, Wiesław & Kostowski, Wojciech, 2015. "Thermo-ecological assessment of CCHP (combined cold-heat-and-power) plant supported with renewable energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 92(P3), pages 279-289.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:11:p:885-:d:81648. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.