IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v9y2016i10p731-d79737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Estimate of Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Resource in Daqing Oilfield, Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Guangzheng Jiang

    (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Yi Wang

    (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Yizuo Shi

    (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Chao Zhang

    (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China)

  • Xiaoyin Tang

    (School of Human Settlements and Civil Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China)

  • Shengbiao Hu

    (State Key Laboratory of Lithospheric Evolution, Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China)

Abstract

Development and utilization of deep geothermal resources, especially a hot dry rock (HDR) geothermal resource, is beneficial for both economic and environmental consideration in oilfields. This study used data from multiple sources to assess the geothermal energy resource in the Daqing Oilfield. The temperature logs in boreholes (both shallow water wells and deep boreholes) and the drilling stem test temperature were used to create isothermal maps in depths. Upon the temperature field and thermophysical parameters of strata, the heat content was calculated by 1 km × 1 km × 0.1 km cells. The result shows that in the southeastern part of Daqing Oilfield, the temperature can reach 150 °C at a depth of 3 km. The heat content within 3–5 km is 24.28 × 10 21 J, wherein 68.2% exceeded 150 °C. If the recovery factor was given by 2% and the lower limit of temperature was set to be 150 °C, the most conservative estimate for recoverable HDR geothermal resource was 0.33 × 10 21 J. The uncertainties of the estimation are mainly contributed to by the temperature extrapolation and the physical parameter selections.

Suggested Citation

  • Guangzheng Jiang & Yi Wang & Yizuo Shi & Chao Zhang & Xiaoyin Tang & Shengbiao Hu, 2016. "Estimate of Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Resource in Daqing Oilfield, Northeast China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:10:p:731-:d:79737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/731/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/9/10/731/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thorsten Agemar & Josef Weber & Rüdiger Schulz, 2014. "Deep Geothermal Energy Production in Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-20, July.
    2. Zhang, Yan-Jun & Li, Zheng-Wei & Guo, Liang-Liang & Gao, Ping & Jin, Xian-Peng & Xu, Tian-Fu, 2014. "Electricity generation from enhanced geothermal systems by oilfield produced water circulating through reservoir stimulated by staged fracturing technology for horizontal wells: A case study in Xujiaw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 788-805.
    3. Olasolo, P. & Juárez, M.C. & Morales, M.P. & D´Amico, Sebastiano & Liarte, I.A., 2016. "Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS): A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 133-144.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guowen Wang & Jian Kuang, 2022. "Genetic Analysis of Geothermal Resources in Deep-Seated Fault Area in Tonghe County, Northeast China and Implications of Geothermal Exploration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-16, April.
    2. Yuchao Zeng & Liansheng Tang & Nengyou Wu & Jing Song & Yifei Cao, 2017. "Orthogonal Test Analysis on Conditions Affecting Electricity Generation Performance of an Enhanced Geothermal System at Yangbajing Geothermal Field," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Tairu & Liu, Gang & Liao, Shengming, 2019. "Impacts of boundary conditions on reservoir numerical simulation and performance prediction of enhanced geothermal systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 202-213.
    2. Muhammad Haris & Michael Z. Hou & Wentao Feng & Jiashun Luo & Muhammad Khurram Zahoor & Jianxing Liao, 2020. "Investigative Coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical Modelling Approach for Geothermal Heat Extraction through Multistage Hydraulic Fracturing from Hot Geothermal Sedimentary Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    4. Chi Yao & Yulong Shao & Jianhua Yang, 2018. "Numerical Investigation on the Influence of Areal Flow on EGS Thermal Exploitation Based on the 3-D T-H Single Fracture Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    6. Banks, Jonathan & Rabbani, Arif & Nadkarni, Kabir & Renaud, Evan, 2020. "Estimating parasitic loads related to brine production from a hot sedimentary aquifer geothermal project: A case study from the Clarke Lake gas field, British Columbia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 539-552.
    7. Tomasz Sliwa & Aneta Sapińska-Śliwa & Andrzej Gonet & Tomasz Kowalski & Anna Sojczyńska, 2021. "Geothermal Boreholes in Poland—Overview of the Current State of Knowledge," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, June.
    8. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Wu, Linping & Liu, Wei Victor, 2020. "Numerical modeling of a coaxial borehole heat exchanger to exploit geothermal energy from abandoned petroleum wells in Hinton, Alberta," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 1110-1123.
    9. Yu Wang & Tianfu Xu & Yuxiang Cheng & Guanhong Feng, 2022. "Prospects for Power Generation of the Doublet Supercritical Geothermal System in Reykjanes Geothermal Field, Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    10. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    11. Hu, Xincheng & Banks, Jonathan & Guo, Yunting & Liu, Wei Victor, 2022. "Utilizing geothermal energy from enhanced geothermal systems as a heat source for oil sands separation: A numerical evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(PA).
    12. Linkai Li & Xiao Guo & Ming Zhou & Gang Xiang & Ning Zhang & Yue Wang & Shengyuan Wang & Arnold Landjobo Pagou, 2021. "The Investigation of Fracture Networks on Heat Extraction Performance for an Enhanced Geothermal System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Strobel, Gion & Hagemann, Birger & Huppertz, Thiago Martins & Ganzer, Leonhard, 2020. "Underground bio-methanation: Concept and potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    14. Davide Toselli & Florian Heberle & Dieter Brüggemann, 2019. "Techno-Economic Analysis of Hybrid Binary Cycles with Geothermal Energy and Biogas Waste Heat Recovery," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    15. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    16. Yang, Fujian & Wang, Guiling & Hu, Dawei & Liu, Yanguang & Zhou, Hui & Tan, Xianfeng, 2021. "Calibrations of thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling parameters for heating and water-cooling treated granite," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 544-558.
    17. Majorowicz, Jacek & Grasby, Stephen E., 2019. "Deep geothermal energy in Canadian sedimentary basins VS. Fossils based energy we try to replace – Exergy [KJ/KG] compared," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 259-277.
    18. Fengchang Jiang & Haiyan Xie & Oliver Ellen, 2018. "Hybrid Energy System with Optimized Storage for Improvement of Sustainability in a Small Town," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Zeng, Yu-Chao & Zhan, Jie-Min & Wu, Neng-You & Luo, Ying-Ying & Cai, Wen-Hao, 2016. "Numerical investigation of electricity generation potential from fractured granite reservoir through a single vertical well at Yangbajing geothermal field," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 24-39.
    20. Huijing Tan & Xiuhua Zheng & Chenyang Duan & Bairu Xia, 2016. "Polylactic Acid Improves the Rheological Properties, and Promotes the Degradation of Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose-Modified Alkali-Activated Cement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-17, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:9:y:2016:i:10:p:731-:d:79737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.