IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p573-d1576958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Behavior of European Union Companies in Terms of Increasing Energy Efficiency from the Perspective of Achieving Climate Neutrality

Author

Listed:
  • Małgorzata Sztorc

    (Department of Management and Organization, Faculty of Management and Computer Modeling, Kielce University of Technology, Al. Tysiąclecia Państwa Polskiego 7, 25-314 Kielce, Poland)

Abstract

This article aims to identify and verify the actions taken by European Union companies related to improving energy efficiency with the requirements of the Fit for 55 packages and striving for climate neutrality by assessing the degree of implementation of pro-ecological solutions, identifying key challenges, and comparing differences in the level of energy transformation in the member states. This article attempts to assess actions related to minimizing energy consumption and reducing greenhouse gas emissions by companies operating in the 27 European Union countries, based on statistical data from Eurostat databases. To analyze the obtained data, the diagnostic–descriptive method, principal component analysis, and the multi-criteria MOORA method were used. The conducted research procedure indicates differences in the level of adaptation of companies regarding the implementation of the goals resulting from the climate and energy package adopted by the European Union. Companies located in France, Sweden, and Finland demonstrate the highest level of energy transformation. On the other hand, a passive degree of adaptation in the transition from traditional fossil fuels to renewable energy sources is characterizes companies from Germany, the Netherlands, and Poland.

Suggested Citation

  • Małgorzata Sztorc, 2025. "The Behavior of European Union Companies in Terms of Increasing Energy Efficiency from the Perspective of Achieving Climate Neutrality," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-40, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:573-:d:1576958
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/573/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/573/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ahmed, Faraedoon & Foley, Aoife & McLoone, Sean & Best, Robert & Lund, Henrik & Al Kez, Dlzar, 2025. "Sectoral coupling pathway towards a 100 % renewable energy system for Northern Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Cameron Hepburn & Brian O’Callaghan & Nicholas Stern & Joseph Stiglitz & Dimitri Zenghelis, 2020. "Will COVID-19 fiscal recovery packages accelerate or retard progress on climate change?," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 36(Supplemen), pages 359-381.
    3. Ahang, Mohammadreza & Granado, Pedro Crespo del & Tomasgard, Asgeir, 2025. "Investments in green hydrogen as a flexibility source for the European power system by 2050: Does it pay off?," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 378(PA).
    4. Dagmara Kociuba & Maciej Janczak, 2024. "Effects of the Disbursement of EU Cohesion Policy 2014–2020 Funds on Improving the Energy Efficiency of Buildings in Poland and Germany," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, September.
    5. Chen, Zhendong & Ghosh, Aritra, 2024. "Techno-financial analysis of 100 % renewable electricity for the south west region of the UK by 2050," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    6. Lundberg, Liv & Cintas Sanchez, Olivia & Zetterholm, Jonas, 2023. "The impact of blending mandates on biofuel consumption, production, emission reductions and fuel prices," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    8. Kati Kulovesi & Sebastian Oberthür & Harro van Asselt & Annalisa Savaresi, 2024. "The European Climate Law: Strengthening EU Procedural Climate Governance?," Journal of Environmental Law, Oxford University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 23-42.
    9. Bertoldi, Paolo & Mosconi, Rocco, 2020. "Do energy efficiency policies save energy? A new approach based on energy policy indicators (in the EU Member States)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    10. Pastore, Lorenzo Mario & Groppi, Daniele & Feijoo, Felipe & Lo Basso, Gianluigi & Astiaso Garcia, Davide & de Santoli, Livio, 2024. "Optimal decarbonisation pathways for the Italian energy system: Modelling a long-term energy transition to achieve zero emission by 2050," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).
    11. Clemens, Marius & Röger, Werner, 2024. "What is the difference between fossil fuel embargo and price shocks?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    12. Tang, Jiaomei & Li, Wanting & Hu, Jiahan & Ren, Yayun, 2025. "Can government digital transformation improve corporate energy efficiency in resource-based cities?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    13. Román-Collado, Rocío & Economidou, Marina, 2021. "The role of energy efficiency in assessing the progress towards the EU energy efficiency targets of 2020: Evidence from the European productive sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    14. Soto, Gonzalo H & Martinez-Cobas, Xavier, 2024. "Green energy policies and energy poverty in Europe: Assessing low carbon dependency and energy productivity," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Falkoni, A. & Krajačić, G. & M Mimica, marko, 2024. "Model of a 100 % renewable energy system of self-sufficient wider urban area based on a short-term scale and the integration of the transport and thermal sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    16. Barbara Kryk & Małgorzata Klaudia Guzowska, 2021. "Implementation of Climate/Energy Targets of the Europe 2020 Strategy by the EU Member States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, May.
    17. Economidou, M. & Ringel, M. & Valentova, M. & Castellazzi, L. & Zancanella, P. & Zangheri, P. & Serrenho, T. & Paci, D. & Bertoldi, P., 2022. "Strategic energy and climate policy planning: Lessons learned from European energy efficiency policies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    18. David J. Teece, 2007. "Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(13), pages 1319-1350, December.
    19. DAY, Christopher James, 2022. "Why industrial location matters in a low-carbon economy," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 283-292.
    20. Johannsen, Rasmus Magni & Mathiesen, Brian Vad & Kermeli, Katerina & Crijns-Graus, Wina & Østergaard, Poul Alberg, 2023. "Exploring pathways to 100% renewable energy in European industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    21. Zastempowski, Maciej, 2023. "Analysis and modeling of innovation factors to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources - Evidence from European Union enterprises," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    22. Gouldson, Andy, 2008. "Understanding business decision making on the environment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 4618-4620, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. FeCheng Ma & Farhan Khan & Kashif Ullah Khan & Si XiangYun, 2021. "Investigating the Impact of Information Technology, Absorptive Capacity, and Dynamic Capabilities on Firm Performance: An Empirical Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    2. Kim, Jongwook & Mahoney, Joseph T., 2008. "A Strategic Theory of the Firm as a Nexus of Incomplete Contracts: A Property Rights Approach," Working Papers 08-0108, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, College of Business.
    3. Zhonghua Zhao & Fanchen Meng & Yin He & Zhouyang Gu, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Competitive Advantage with Multiple Mediations from Social Capital and Dynamic Capabilities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Pandza, Krsto & Ellwood, Paul, 2013. "Strategic and ethical foundations for responsible innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 1112-1125.
    5. Hélène Laurell & Leona Achtenhagen & Svante Andersson, 2017. "The changing role of network ties and critical capabilities in an international new venture’s early development," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 113-140, March.
    6. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    7. Sjödin, David & Liljeborg, Alexander & Mutter, Sermed, 2024. "Conceptualizing ecosystem management capabilities: Managing the ecosystem-organization interface," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    8. Jantunen, Ari & Tarkiainen, Anssi & Chari, Simos & Oghazi, Pejvak, 2018. "Dynamic capabilities, operational changes, and performance outcomes in the media industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 251-257.
    9. Hazhir Rahmandad & Nelson Repenning, 2016. "Capability erosion dynamics," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 649-672, April.
    10. Yi-Ju Lo & Tung Hung, 2015. "Structure offshoring and returns on offshoring," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 32(2), pages 443-479, June.
    11. von den Driesch, Till & Eva Susanne da Costa, Maika & Christina Flatten, Tessa & Brettel, Malte, 2015. "How CEO experience, personality, and network affect firms' dynamic capabilities," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 245-256.
    12. Kazadi, Kande & Lievens, Annouk & Mahr, Dominik, 2016. "Stakeholder co-creation during the innovation process: Identifying capabilities for knowledge creation among multiple stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 525-540.
    13. Quan Anh Nguyen & Gillian Sullivan Mort, 0. "Conceptualising organisational-level and microfoundational capabilities: an integrated view of born-globals’ internationalisation," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    14. Nadia Zahoor & Huda Khan & Zaheer Khan & Pervaiz Akhtar, 2024. "Responsible innovation in emerging markets’ SMEs: The role of alliance learning and absorptive capacity," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 1175-1209, September.
    15. J. de Curtò & I. de Zarzà & Leandro Sebastián Fervier & Victoria Sanagustín-Fons & Carlos T. Calafate, 2025. "An Institutional Theory Framework for Leveraging Large Language Models for Policy Analysis and Intervention Design," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-28, February.
    16. Chang, Kuo-Hsiung & Gotcher, Donald F., 2020. "How and when does co-production facilitate eco-innovation in international buyer-supplier relationships? The role of environmental innovation ambidexterity and institutional pressures," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(5).
    17. Bianchini, Stefano & Pellegrino, Gabriele, 2019. "Innovation persistence and employment dynamics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(5), pages 1171-1186.
    18. C. Lakshman & Sangeetha Lakshman & Kubilay Gok, 2023. "Managers’ knowledge and customer-focused knowledge management as dynamic capabilities: implications for innovation performance," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 22(1), pages 246-274, February.
    19. Amandine Maus & Sylvie Sammut, 2018. "Business model innovation in incubators: the role played by dynamic capabilities theory," Post-Print hal-02466175, HAL.
    20. Jolien Roelandt & Petra Andries & Mirjam Knockaert, 2022. "The contribution of board experience to opportunity development in high-tech ventures," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1627-1645, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:573-:d:1576958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.