IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i3p477-d1572937.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Numerical Analysis to Design and Optimize River Hydrokinetic Turbines’ Capacity Factor to Address Seasonal Velocity Variations

Author

Listed:
  • Bahador Shaabani

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, 75 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada)

  • Vijay Chatoorgoon

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, 75 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada)

  • Eric Louis Bibeau

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Manitoba, 75 Chancellors Cir, Winnipeg, MB R3T 5V6, Canada)

Abstract

Seasonal velocity variations can significantly impact the total energy delivered to microgrids produced by river hydrokinetic turbines. These turbines typically use a diffuser to increase the velocity at the rotor section, adding weight and raising deployment costs. There is a need for practical solutions to improve the capacity factor of such turbines. Our solution involves using multiple turbine rotors that can be interchanged to match seasonal velocity changes, eliminating shrouds to simplify design and reduce costs. This solution requires turbines that are designed to have an easily interchanged rotor, which requires us to limit the rotor to a two-blade design to also lower costs. This approach adjusts the turbine power curve with different two-blade rotor sizes, enhancing the yearly capacity factor. BladeGen ANSYS Workbench is used to design three two-blade rotors for free stream velocities of 1.6, 2.2, and 2.8 m/s. For each turbine rotor, 3D simulation is applied to reduce aerodynamic losses and target a coefficient of performance of about 45%. Mechanical stress analyses assess the displacement and stress of the used composite materials. Numerical results show good agreement with experimental data, with rotor efficiencies ranging from 43% to 45% at a tip speed ratio of 4 and power output between 5.4 and 5.6 kW. Results show that rotor interchangeability significantly enhances the turbine capacity factor, increasing it from 52% to 92% by adapting to river seasonal velocity changes.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahador Shaabani & Vijay Chatoorgoon & Eric Louis Bibeau, 2025. "Using Numerical Analysis to Design and Optimize River Hydrokinetic Turbines’ Capacity Factor to Address Seasonal Velocity Variations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:477-:d:1572937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/477/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/3/477/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaden, David L.F. & Bibeau, Eric L., 2010. "A numerical investigation into the effect of diffusers on the performance of hydro kinetic turbines using a validated momentum source turbine model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(6), pages 1152-1158.
    2. Chang, Tian-Pau & Liu, Feng-Jiao & Ko, Hong-Hsi & Cheng, Shih-Ping & Sun, Li-Chung & Kuo, Shye-Chorng, 2014. "Comparative analysis on power curve models of wind turbine generator in estimating capacity factor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 88-95.
    3. Stephanie Ordonez-Sanchez & Matthew Allmark & Kate Porter & Robert Ellis & Catherine Lloyd & Ivan Santic & Tim O’Doherty & Cameron Johnstone, 2019. "Analysis of a Horizontal-Axis Tidal Turbine Performance in the Presence of Regular and Irregular Waves Using Two Control Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-22, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nishi, Yasuyuki & Sato, Genki & Shiohara, Daishi & Inagaki, Terumi & Kikuchi, Norio, 2017. "Performance characteristics of axial flow hydraulic turbine with a collection device in free surface flow field," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 53-62.
    2. Aldersey-Williams, John & Broadbent, Ian D. & Strachan, Peter A., 2020. "Analysis of United Kingdom offshore wind farm performance using public data: Improving the evidence base for policymaking," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    3. Mehrjoo, Mehrdad & Jafari Jozani, Mohammad & Pawlak, Miroslaw, 2021. "Toward hybrid approaches for wind turbine power curve modeling with balanced loss functions and local weighting schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    4. He, J.Y. & Chan, P.W. & Li, Q.S. & Huang, Tao & Yim, Steve Hung Lam, 2024. "Assessment of urban wind energy resource in Hong Kong based on multi-instrument observations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Elbatran, A.H. & Ahmed, Yasser M. & Shehata, Ahmed S., 2017. "Performance study of ducted nozzle Savonius water turbine, comparison with conventional Savonius turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 566-584.
    6. de Medeiros, Armando Lúcio Ramos & Araújo, Alex Maurício & de Oliveira Filho, Oyama Douglas Queiroz & Rohatgi, Janardan & dos Santos, Maurílio José, 2015. "Analysis of design parameters of large-sized wind turbines by non-dimensional model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 1146-1154.
    7. Maduka, Maduka & Li, Chi Wai, 2022. "Experimental evaluation of power performance and wake characteristics of twin flanged duct turbines in tandem under bi-directional tidal flows," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1543-1567.
    8. Yang Hu & Yilin Qiao & Jingchun Chu & Ling Yuan & Lei Pan, 2019. "Joint Point-Interval Prediction and Optimization of Wind Power Considering the Sequential Uncertainties of Stepwise Procedure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Borg, Mitchell G. & Xiao, Qing & Allsop, Steven & Incecik, Atilla & Peyrard, Christophe, 2020. "A numerical performance analysis of a ducted, high-solidity tidal turbine," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 663-682.
    10. Antonio Bracale & Pasquale De Falco, 2015. "An Advanced Bayesian Method for Short-Term Probabilistic Forecasting of the Generation of Wind Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-22, September.
    11. Gaden, David L.F. & Bibeau, Eric L., 2010. "A numerical investigation into upstream boundary-layer interruption and its potential benefits for river and ocean kinetic hydropower," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(10), pages 2270-2278.
    12. Villeneuve, Thierry & Boudreau, Matthieu & Dumas, Guy, 2021. "Assessing the performance and the wake recovery rate of flapping-foil turbines with end-plates and detached end-plates," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 206-222.
    13. Kumar, Dipesh & Chatterjee, Kalyan, 2016. "A review of conventional and advanced MPPT algorithms for wind energy systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 957-970.
    14. Allmark, Matthew & Ellis, Robert & Lloyd, Catherine & Ordonez-Sanchez, Stephanie & Johannesen, Kate & Byrne, Carl & Johnstone, Cameron & O’Doherty, Tim & Mason-Jones, Allan, 2020. "The development, design and characterisation of a scale model Horizontal Axis Tidal Turbine for dynamic load quantification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 913-930.
    15. Feng, Cong & Sun, Mucun & Cui, Mingjian & Chartan, Erol Kevin & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & Zhang, Jie, 2019. "Characterizing forecastability of wind sites in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1352-1365.
    16. Ramin Alipour & Roozbeh Alipour & Seyed Saeid Rahimian Koloor & Michal Petrů & Seyed Alireza Ghazanfari, 2020. "On the Performance of Small-Scale Horizontal Axis Tidal Current Turbines. Part 1: One Single Turbine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-25, July.
    17. Francisco Bilendo & Angela Meyer & Hamed Badihi & Ningyun Lu & Philippe Cambron & Bin Jiang, 2022. "Applications and Modeling Techniques of Wind Turbine Power Curve for Wind Farms—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-38, December.
    18. Fathabadi, Hassan, 2016. "Novel high-efficient unified maximum power point tracking controller for hybrid fuel cell/wind systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 1498-1510.
    19. Liu, Jie & Song, Mengxuan & Chen, Kai & Wu, Bingheng & Zhang, Xing, 2016. "An optimization methodology for wind lens profile using Computational Fluid Dynamics simulation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 602-611.
    20. Mazhar Hussain Baloch & Dahaman Ishak & Sohaib Tahir Chaudary & Baqir Ali & Ali Asghar Memon & Touqeer Ahmed Jumani, 2019. "Wind Power Integration: An Experimental Investigation for Powering Local Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-24, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:3:p:477-:d:1572937. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.