IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i7p1667-d1367812.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications

Author

Listed:
  • James M. Wilczak

    (NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA)

  • Elena Akish

    (NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • Antonietta Capotondi

    (NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

  • Gilbert P. Compo

    (NOAA Physical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
    Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES), University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA)

Abstract

The applicability of the ERA5 reanalysis for estimating wind and solar energy generation over the contiguous United States is evaluated using wind speed and irradiance variables from multiple observational data sets. After converting ERA5 and observed meteorological variables into wind power and solar power, comparisons demonstrate that significant errors in the ERA5 reanalysis exist that limit its direct applicability for a wind and solar energy analysis. Overall, ERA5-derived solar power is biased high, while ERA5-derived wind power is biased low. During winter, the ERA5-derived solar power is biased high by 23% on average, while on an annual basis, the ERA5-derived wind power is biased low by 20%. ERA5-derived solar power errors are found to have consistent characteristics across the contiguous United States. Errors for the shortest duration and most extreme solar negative anomaly events are relatively small in the ERA5 when completely overcast conditions occur in both the ERA5 and observations. However, longer-duration anomaly events on weekly to monthly timescales, which include partially cloudy days or a mix of cloudy and sunny days, have significant ERA5 errors. At 10 days duration, the ERA5-derived average solar power produced during the largest negative anomaly events is 62% greater than observed. The ERA5 wind speed and derived wind power negative biases are largely consistent across the central and northwestern U.S., and offshore, while the northeastern U.S. has an overall small net bias. For the ERA5-derived most extreme negative anomaly wind power events, at some sites at 10 days duration, the ERA5-derived wind power produced can be less than half of that observed. Corrections to ERA5 are derived using a quantile–quantile method for solar power and linear regression of wind speed for wind power. These methods are shown to avoid potential over-inflation of the reanalysis variability resulting from differences between point measurements and the temporally and spatially smoother reanalysis values. The corrections greatly reduce the ERA5 errors, including those for extreme events associated with wind and solar energy droughts, which will be most challenging for electric grid operation.

Suggested Citation

  • James M. Wilczak & Elena Akish & Antonietta Capotondi & Gilbert P. Compo, 2024. "Evaluation and Bias Correction of the ERA5 Reanalysis over the United States for Wind and Solar Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-36, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1667-:d:1367812
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1667/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/7/1667/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Draxl, Caroline & Clifton, Andrew & Hodge, Bri-Mathias & McCaa, Jim, 2015. "The Wind Integration National Dataset (WIND) Toolkit," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 355-366.
    2. Giovanni Gualtieri, 2021. "Reliability of ERA5 Reanalysis Data for Wind Resource Assessment: A Comparison against Tall Towers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Mathews, Duncan & Ó Gallachóir, Brian & Deane, Paul, 2023. "Systematic bias in reanalysis-derived solar power profiles & the potential for error propagation in long duration energy storage studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    4. Gualtieri, G., 2022. "Analysing the uncertainties of reanalysis data used for wind resource assessment: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Costoya, X. & Rocha, A. & Carvalho, D., 2020. "Using bias-correction to improve future projections of offshore wind energy resource: A case study on the Iberian Peninsula," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Jaemo & Sengupta, Manajit & Xie, Yu & Shin, Hyeyum Hailey, 2023. "Developing a 20-year high-resolution wind data set for Puerto Rico," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    2. Houndekindo, Freddy & Ouarda, Taha B.M.J., 2024. "Prediction of hourly wind speed time series at unsampled locations using machine learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    3. Yang, Xinrong & Jiang, Xin & Liang, Shijing & Qin, Yingzuo & Ye, Fan & Ye, Bin & Xu, Jiayu & He, Xinyue & Wu, Jie & Dong, Tianyun & Cai, Xitian & Xu, Rongrong & Zeng, Zhenzhong, 2024. "Spatiotemporal variation of power law exponent on the use of wind energy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 356(C).
    4. Pedro, Hugo T.C. & Lim, Edwin & Coimbra, Carlos F.M., 2018. "A database infrastructure to implement real-time solar and wind power generation intra-hour forecasts," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 513-525.
    5. Sward, J.A. & Ault, T.R. & Zhang, K.M., 2023. "Spatial biases revealed by LiDAR in a multiphysics WRF ensemble designed for offshore wind," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PA).
    6. Weifeng Xu & Bing Yu & Qing Song & Liguo Weng & Man Luo & Fan Zhang, 2022. "Economic and Low-Carbon-Oriented Distribution Network Planning Considering the Uncertainties of Photovoltaic Generation and Load Demand to Achieve Their Reliability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Munir Ali Elfarra & Mustafa Kaya, 2018. "Comparison of Optimum Spline-Based Probability Density Functions to Parametric Distributions for the Wind Speed Data in Terms of Annual Energy Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Craig, Michael & Guerra, Omar J. & Brancucci, Carlo & Pambour, Kwabena Addo & Hodge, Bri-Mathias, 2020. "Valuing intra-day coordination of electric power and natural gas system operations," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    9. Zimmerman, Ryan & Panda, Anurag & Bulović, Vladimir, 2020. "Techno-economic assessment and deployment strategies for vertically-mounted photovoltaic panels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. McManamay, Ryan A. & DeRolph, Christopher R. & Surendran-Nair, Sujithkumar & Allen-Dumas, Melissa, 2019. "Spatially explicit land-energy-water future scenarios for cities: Guiding infrastructure transitions for urban sustainability," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 880-900.
    11. Julien Walzberg & Annika Eberle, 2023. "Modeling Systems’ Disruption and Social Acceptance—A Proof-of-Concept Leveraging Reinforcement Learning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-13, June.
    12. Pierre Pinson & Liyang Han & Jalal Kazempour, 2022. "Regression markets and application to energy forecasting," TOP: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(3), pages 533-573, October.
    13. Tanner, Sophia & Burnett, Wesley & Maguire, Karen & Winikoff, Justin, 2024. "Blown Away: The Influence of Wind Farms on Agricultural Land Values," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343970, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    14. Shawhan, Daniel & Funke, Christoph & Witkin, Steven, 2020. "Benefits of Energy Technology Innovation Part 1: Power Sector Modeling Results," RFF Working Paper Series 20-19, Resources for the Future.
    15. Xu, Yuanyuan & Yang, Genke & Luo, Jiliang & He, Jianan & Sun, Haixin, 2022. "A multi-location short-term wind speed prediction model based on spatiotemporal joint learning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 148-159.
    16. Denholm, Paul & Nunemaker, Jacob & Gagnon, Pieter & Cole, Wesley, 2020. "The potential for battery energy storage to provide peaking capacity in the United States," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1269-1277.
    17. Yiyang Sun & Xiangwen Wang & Junjie Yang, 2022. "Modified Particle Swarm Optimization with Attention-Based LSTM for Wind Power Prediction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. He, Yuhang & Han, Xingxing & Xu, Chang & Cheng, Zhe & Wang, Jincheng & Liu, Wei & Xu, Dong, 2023. "Sensitivity of simulated wind power under diverse spatial scales and multiple terrains using the weather research and forecasting model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    19. Howard, B. & Waite, M. & Modi, V., 2017. "Current and near-term GHG emissions factors from electricity production for New York State and New York City," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 255-271.
    20. Li, Xuyang & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Wang, Zheng, 2021. "Wind turbine power prediction considering wake effects with dual laser beam LiDAR measured yaw misalignment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    wind energy; solar energy; ERA5; bias correction; droughts;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:7:p:1667-:d:1367812. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.