IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i5p1177-d1349570.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influences of Average Temperature Difference and Measurement Period on Estimation of In Situ Thermal Transmittance of Building Exterior Walls Using the Average Method of ISO 9869-1

Author

Listed:
  • Ye-Ji Lee

    (Department of Architectural Design and Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea)

  • Ji-Hoon Moon

    (Department of Architectural Design and Engineering, Incheon National University, Incheon 22012, Republic of Korea)

  • Doo-Sung Choi

    (Department of Building Equipment System and Fire Protection Engineering, Chungwoon University, Incheon 22100, Republic of Korea)

  • Myeong-Jin Ko

    (Department of Building System Technology, Daelim University College, Anyang 13916, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Many studies have sought to overcome the two main limitations of the average method of ISO 9869-1—its long test duration and low accuracy. These studies reported that the reliability of the results is dependent on the temperature differences. This consensus was based on the results of studies that measured a few cases with specific temperature differences, and the convergence criteria utilized for the representative thermal transmittance (U-value) were rarely examined. This study analyzed the influence of the average temperature difference and test duration on the convergence characteristics and accuracy of U-value estimation using the average method. Data from a north-facing exterior wall with a theoretical U-value of 0.145 W/m 2 ·K were measured between June 2022 and May 2023. The influences of different measurement conditions were analyzed for cases divided based on four measurement periods and 11 average air temperature differences. The findings show that an accurate U-value can be obtained from 7 days’ worth of measurement data with an average temperature difference of 10 °C or higher and that the improvement in accuracy is minimal under stricter conditions. To achieve a convergence probability of over 90% for temperature differences of 10 °C or greater, the second and third criteria required measurement periods of 7 and 15 days respectively.

Suggested Citation

  • Ye-Ji Lee & Ji-Hoon Moon & Doo-Sung Choi & Myeong-Jin Ko, 2024. "Influences of Average Temperature Difference and Measurement Period on Estimation of In Situ Thermal Transmittance of Building Exterior Walls Using the Average Method of ISO 9869-1," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-16, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1177-:d:1349570
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1177/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/5/1177/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Moyano, Juan & Marín, David & Fresco-Contreras, Rafael, 2019. "Review of in situ methods for assessing the thermal transmittance of walls," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 356-371.
    2. Iole Nardi & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "In Situ Thermal Transmittance Assessment of the Building Envelope: Practical Advice and Outlooks for Standard and Innovative Procedures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-31, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrea Alongi & Luca Sala & Adriana Angelotti & Livio Mazzarella, 2023. "In Situ Measurement of Wall Thermal Properties: Parametric Investigation of the Heat Flow Meter Methods through Virtual Experiments Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-21, May.
    2. Eva Schito & Elena Lucchi, 2023. "Advances in the Optimization of Energy Use in Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-3, September.
    3. Doo-Sung Choi & Ye-Ji Lee & Ji-Hoon Moon & Yong-Shik Kim & Myeong-Jin Ko, 2023. "Estimating In-Situ R-Value of Highly Insulated Building Walls Based on the Measurement of Temperature and Heat Flux Inside the Wall," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Sanjin Gumbarević & Bojan Milovanović & Bojana Dalbelo Bašić & Mergim Gaši, 2022. "Combining Deep Learning and the Heat Flux Method for In-Situ Thermal-Transmittance Measurement Improvement," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Xun Liu & Zhenhan Ding & Xiaobo Li & Zhiyuan Xue, 2023. "Research Progress, Hotspots, and Trends of Using BIM to Reduce Building Energy Consumption: Visual Analysis Based on WOS Database," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-21, February.
    6. Víctor Echarri-Iribarren & Nyuk Hien Wong & Ana Sánchez-Ostiz, 2021. "Radiant Floors versus Radiant Walls Using Ceramic Thermal Panels in Mediterranean Dwellings: Annual Energy Demand and Cost-Effective Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    7. Oleksandra Hotra & Svitlana Kovtun & Oleg Dekusha & Żaklin Grądz & Vitalii Babak & Joanna Styczeń, 2022. "Analysis of Low-Density Heat Flux Data by the Wavelet Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Bienvenido-Huertas, David & Rubio-Bellido, Carlos & Solís-Guzmán, Jaime & Oliveira, Miguel José, 2020. "Experimental characterisation of the periodic thermal properties of walls using artificial intelligence," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    9. Wu, Wentao & Zhang, Wei & Benner, Jingru & Malkawi, Ali, 2020. "Critical evaluation of analytical methods for thermally activated building systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    10. David Bienvenido-Huertas & Juan Moyano & Carlos E. Rodríguez-Jiménez & Aurelio Muñoz-Rubio & Francisco Javier Bermúdez Rodríguez, 2020. "Quality Control of the Thermal Properties of Superstructures in Accommodation Spaces in Naval Constructions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-18, May.
    11. Cristina Cornaro & Gianluigi Bovesecchi & Filippo Calcerano & Letizia Martinelli & Elena Gigliarelli, 2023. "An HBIM Integrated Approach Using Non-Destructive Techniques (NDT) to Support Energy and Environmental Improvement of Built Heritage: The Case Study of Palazzo Maffei Borghese in Rome," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-36, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:5:p:1177-:d:1349570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.