IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i2p350-d1316476.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Combined Physics- and Data-Driven Modeling for the Design and Operation Optimization of an Energy Concept Including a Storage System

Author

Listed:
  • Rushit Kansara

    (German Aerospace Center, Institute of Low-Carbon Industrial Processes, 03046 Cottbus, Germany)

  • Michael Lockan

    (German Aerospace Center, Institute of Low-Carbon Industrial Processes, 03046 Cottbus, Germany)

  • María Isabel Roldán Serrano

    (German Aerospace Center, Institute of Low-Carbon Industrial Processes, 03046 Cottbus, Germany)

Abstract

The industrial sector accounts for a huge amount of energy- and process-related CO 2 emissions. One decarbonization measure is to build an energy concept that provides electricity and heat for industrial processes using a combination of different renewable energy sources, such as photovoltaic, wind turbine, and solar thermal collector systems, integrating also energy conversion power-to-heat components such as heat pumps, electric boilers, and thermal energy storage. The challenge for the industries is the economic aspect of the decarbonization, as industries require a cost-efficient solution. Minimizing cost and emissions together is a complex problem, which requires two major tasks: (I) modeling of components and (II) multi-objective coupled design and operation optimization of the energy concept. The optimal design and capacity of the components and optimal system operation depend majorly on component modeling, which is either physics-driven or data-driven. This paper shows different types of physics- and data-driven modeling of energy components for multi-objective coupled optimization in order to minimize costs and emissions of a specific industrial process as a case study. Several modeling techniques and their influence on the optimization are compared in terms of computational effort, solution accuracy, and optimal capacity of components. The results show that the combination of physics- and data-driven models has a computational time reduction of up to 37% for an energy concept without thermal energy storage and 29% for that with thermal energy storage, both with high-accuracy solutions compared to complete physics-driven models for the considered case study.

Suggested Citation

  • Rushit Kansara & Michael Lockan & María Isabel Roldán Serrano, 2024. "Combined Physics- and Data-Driven Modeling for the Design and Operation Optimization of an Energy Concept Including a Storage System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:350-:d:1316476
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/2/350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Voll, Philip & Klaffke, Carsten & Hennen, Maike & Bardow, André, 2013. "Automated superstructure-based synthesis and optimization of distributed energy supply systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 374-388.
    2. Ekonomou, L., 2010. "Greek long-term energy consumption prediction using artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 512-517.
    3. Patwal, Rituraj Singh & Narang, Nitin, 2020. "Multi-objective generation scheduling of integrated energy system using fuzzy based surrogate worth trade-off approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 864-882.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Seyed Mohammad Shojaei & Reihaneh Aghamolaei & Mohammad Reza Ghaani, 2024. "Recent Advancements in Applying Machine Learning in Power-to-X Processes: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-41, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pin Li & Jinsuo Zhang, 2019. "Is China’s Energy Supply Sustainable? New Research Model Based on the Exponential Smoothing and GM(1,1) Methods," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Sun, Li & Doyle, Stephen & Smith, Robin, 2016. "Understanding steam costs for energy conservation projects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 647-655.
    3. Bahl, Björn & Kümpel, Alexander & Seele, Hagen & Lampe, Matthias & Bardow, André, 2017. "Time-series aggregation for synthesis problems by bounding error in the objective function," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 900-912.
    4. Meng, Ming & Niu, Dongxiao, 2011. "Modeling CO2 emissions from fossil fuel combustion using the logistic equation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3355-3359.
    5. Atul Anand & L Suganthi, 2018. "Hybrid GA-PSO Optimization of Artificial Neural Network for Forecasting Electricity Demand," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-15, March.
    6. Pruethsan Sutthichaimethee & Boonton Dockthaisong, 2018. "A Relationship of Causal Factors in the Economic, Social, and Environmental Aspects Affecting the Implementation of Sustainability Policy in Thailand: Enriching the Path Analysis Based on a GMM Model," Resources, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.
    7. Dong, Ming & Shi, Jian & Shi, Qingxin, 2020. "Multi-year long-term load forecast for area distribution feeders based on selective sequence learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    8. Gholami, M. & Barbaresi, A. & Torreggiani, D. & Tassinari, P., 2020. "Upscaling of spatial energy planning, phases, methods, and techniques: A systematic review through meta-analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Vincenzo Bianco & Annalisa Marchitto & Federico Scarpa & Luca A. Tagliafico, 2020. "Forecasting Energy Consumption in the EU Residential Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Amasyali, Kadir & El-Gohary, Nora M., 2018. "A review of data-driven building energy consumption prediction studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 1192-1205.
    11. Movagharnejad, Kamyar & Mehdizadeh, Bahman & Banihashemi, Morteza & Kordkheili, Masoud Sheikhi, 2011. "Forecasting the differences between various commercial oil prices in the Persian Gulf region by neural network," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(7), pages 3979-3984.
    12. Lee, Yi-Shian & Tong, Lee-Ing, 2012. "Forecasting nonlinear time series of energy consumption using a hybrid dynamic model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 251-256.
    13. Wu, Qunli & Peng, Chenyang, 2017. "A hybrid BAG-SA optimal approach to estimate energy demand of China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 985-995.
    14. Can, Özer & Baklacioglu, Tolga & Özturk, Erkan & Turan, Onder, 2022. "Artificial neural networks modeling of combustion parameters for a diesel engine fueled with biodiesel fuel," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 247(C).
    15. Mergani A. Khairalla & Xu Ning & Nashat T. AL-Jallad & Musaab O. El-Faroug, 2018. "Short-Term Forecasting for Energy Consumption through Stacking Heterogeneous Ensemble Learning Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Yokoyama, Ryohei & Tokunaga, Akira & Wakui, Tetsuya, 2018. "Robust optimal design of energy supply systems under uncertain energy demands based on a mixed-integer linear model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 159-169.
    17. Chen, Guangwu & Zhu, Yuhan & Wiedmann, Thomas & Yao, Lina & Xu, Lixiao & Wang, Yafei, 2019. "Urban-rural disparities of household energy requirements and influence factors in China: Classification tree models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 250(C), pages 1321-1335.
    18. Halmschlager, Daniel & Beck, Anton & Knöttner, Sophie & Koller, Martin & Hofmann, René, 2022. "Combined optimization for retrofitting of heat recovery and thermal energy supply in industrial systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    19. Capuder, Tomislav & Mancarella, Pierluigi, 2014. "Techno-economic and environmental modelling and optimization of flexible distributed multi-generation options," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 516-533.
    20. Almonacid, F. & Rus, C. & Pérez-Higueras, P. & Hontoria, L., 2011. "Calculation of the energy provided by a PV generator. Comparative study: Conventional methods vs. artificial neural networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 375-384.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:2:p:350-:d:1316476. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.