IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i23p6005-d1532268.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Role of Underground Salt Caverns in Renewable Energy Peaking: A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Si Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yinping Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
    Hubei Key Laboratory of Geo-Environmental Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China)

  • Xilin Shi

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Weizheng Bai

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yashuai Huang

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Yang Hong

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Xiaoyi Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Hongling Ma

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Peng Li

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Mingnan Xu

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

  • Tianfu Xue

    (State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
    University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)

Abstract

To address the inherent intermittency and instability of renewable energy, the construction of large-scale energy storage facilities is imperative. Salt caverns are internationally recognized as excellent sites for large-scale energy storage. They have been widely used to store substances such as natural gas, oil, air, and hydrogen. With the global transition in energy structures and the increasing demand for renewable energy load balancing, there is broad market potential for the development of salt cavern energy storage technologies. There are three types of energy storage in salt caverns that can be coupled with renewable energy sources, namely, salt cavern compressed air energy storage (SCCAES), salt cavern hydrogen storage (SCHS), and salt cavern flow battery (SCFB). The innovation of this paper is to comprehensively review the current status and future development trends of these three energy storage methods. Firstly, the development status of these three energy storage methods, both domestically and internationally, is reviewed. Secondly, according to the characteristics of these three types of energy storage methods, some key technical challenges are proposed to be focused on. The key technical challenge for SCCAES is the need to further reduce the cost of the ground equipment; the key technical challenge for SCHS is to prevent the risk of hydrogen leakage; and the key technical challenge for SCFB is the need to further increase the concentration of the active substance in the huge salt cavern. Finally, some potential solutions are proposed based on these key technical challenges. This work is of great significance in accelerating the development of salt cavern energy storage technologies in coupled renewable energy.

Suggested Citation

  • Si Huang & Yinping Li & Xilin Shi & Weizheng Bai & Yashuai Huang & Yang Hong & Xiaoyi Liu & Hongling Ma & Peng Li & Mingnan Xu & Tianfu Xue, 2024. "The Role of Underground Salt Caverns in Renewable Energy Peaking: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-23, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6005-:d:1532268
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6005/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/23/6005/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Soubeyran, A. & Rouabhi, A. & Coquelet, C., 2019. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide storage in salt caverns to improve the Power-to-Gas process," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C), pages 1090-1107.
    2. Omid Ahmad Mahmoudi Zamani & Dariusz Knez, 2024. "Well Integrity in Salt Cavern Hydrogen Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-22, July.
    3. Bai, Weizheng & Shi, Xilin & Yang, Chunhe & Zhu, Shijie & Wei, Xinxing & Li, Yinping & Liu, Xin, 2024. "Assessment of the potential of salt mines for renewable energy peaking in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    4. Christophe McGlade & Paul Ekins, 2015. "The geographical distribution of fossil fuels unused when limiting global warming to 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 517(7533), pages 187-190, January.
    5. Wei, Xinxing & Shi, Xilin & Li, Yinping & Li, Peng & Ban, Shengnan & Zhao, Kai & Ma, Hongling & Liu, Hejuan & Yang, Chunhe, 2023. "A comprehensive feasibility evaluation of salt cavern oil energy storage system in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 351(C).
    6. Ge, Lan & Gong, Xuzhong & Wang, Zhi & Zhao, Lixin & Wang, Yuhua & Wang, Mingyong, 2016. "Insight of anode reaction for CWS (coal water slurry) electrolysis for hydrogen production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 372-382.
    7. Huiyong Song & Song Zhu & Jinlong Li & Zhuoteng Wang & Qingdong Li & Zexu Ning, 2023. "Design Criteria for the Construction of Energy Storage Salt Cavern Considering Economic Benefits and Resource Utilization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Olfa Berrich & Fereshteh Mafakheri & Halim Dabbou, 2024. "Renewable Energy Transition and the Paris Agreement: How Governance Quality Makes a Difference?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-18, August.
    9. Shaojie Song & Haiyang Lin & Peter Sherman & Xi Yang & Chris P. Nielsen & Xinyu Chen & Michael B. McElroy, 2021. "Production of hydrogen from offshore wind in China and cost-competitive supply to Japan," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Enas Taha Sayed & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Abdul Hai Alami & Ali Radwan & Ayman Mdallal & Ahmed Rezk & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    11. Zhu, Shijie & Shi, Xilin & Yang, Chunhe & Li, Yinping & Li, Hang & Yang, Kun & Wei, Xinxing & Bai, Weizheng & Liu, Xin, 2023. "Hydrogen loss of salt cavern hydrogen storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    12. Jifang Wan & Wendong Ji & Yuxian He & Jingcui Li & Ye Gao, 2023. "Pitting and Strip Corrosion Influence on Casing Strength of Salt Cavern Compressed Air Energy Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-14, July.
    13. Steve Westlake & Conor H. D. John & Emily Cox, 2023. "Perception spillover from fracking onto public perceptions of novel energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 8(2), pages 149-158, February.
    14. Reyhaneh Ghorbani Heidarabad & Kyuchul Shin, 2024. "Carbon Capture and Storage in Depleted Oil and Gas Reservoirs: The Viewpoint of Wellbore Injectivity," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Luca Migliari & Davide Micheletto & Daniele Cocco, 2023. "Performance Analysis of a Diabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage System Fueled with Green Hydrogen," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Zhao, Haoran & Wu, Qiuwei & Hu, Shuju & Xu, Honghua & Rasmussen, Claus Nygaard, 2015. "Review of energy storage system for wind power integration support," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 545-553.
    17. Kai Feng & Wenjing Li & Xing Nan & Guangzhi Yang, 2023. "Salt Cavern Thermal Damage Evolution Investigation Based on a Hybrid Continuum-Discrete Coupled Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-26, May.
    18. Gautam Gowrisankaran & Stanley S. Reynolds & Mario Samano, 2016. "Intermittency and the Value of Renewable Energy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 124(4), pages 1187-1234.
    19. Zhu, Shijie & Shi, Xilin & Yang, Chunhe & Bai, Weizheng & Wei, Xinxing & Yang, Kun & Li, Peng & Li, Hang & Li, Yinping & Wang, Guibin, 2024. "Site selection evaluation for salt cavern hydrogen storage in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    20. Morstyn, Thomas & Chilcott, Martin & McCulloch, Malcolm D., 2019. "Gravity energy storage with suspended weights for abandoned mine shafts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(C), pages 201-206.
    21. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Jacek Misiak, 2024. "Underground Gas Storage in Saline Aquifers: Geological Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-23, March.
    22. Feng, Taiwen & Sun, Linyan & Zhang, Ying, 2009. "The relationship between energy consumption structure, economic structure and energy intensity in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(12), pages 5475-5483, December.
    23. Luo, Xing & Wang, Jihong & Dooner, Mark & Clarke, Jonathan, 2015. "Overview of current development in electrical energy storage technologies and the application potential in power system operation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 511-536.
    24. Manzoor Ellahi & Ghulam Abbas & Irfan Khan & Paul Mario Koola & Mashood Nasir & Ali Raza & Umar Farooq, 2019. "Recent Approaches of Forecasting and Optimal Economic Dispatch to Overcome Intermittency of Wind and Photovoltaic (PV) Systems: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-30, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Peng & Li, Yinping & Shi, Xilin & Zhu, Shijie & Ma, Hongling & Yang, Chunhe, 2024. "Gas tightness around salt cavern gas storage in bedded salt formations," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    2. Chen, Long Xiang & Xie, Mei Na & Zhao, Pan Pan & Wang, Feng Xiang & Hu, Peng & Wang, Dong Xiang, 2018. "A novel isobaric adiabatic compressed air energy storage (IA-CAES) system on the base of volatile fluid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 198-210.
    3. Vorushylo, Inna & Keatley, Patrick & Shah, Nikhilkumar & Green, Richard & Hewitt, Neil, 2018. "How heat pumps and thermal energy storage can be used to manage wind power: A study of Ireland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 539-549.
    4. Okazaki, Toru, 2020. "Electric thermal energy storage and advantage of rotating heater having synchronous inertia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 563-574.
    5. Shaohua Hu & Xinlong Zhou & Yi Luo & Guang Zhang, 2019. "Numerical Simulation Three-Dimensional Nonlinear Seepage in a Pumped-Storage Power Station: Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Li, Yang & Vilathgamuwa, Mahinda & Choi, San Shing & Farrell, Troy W. & Tran, Ngoc Tham & Teague, Joseph, 2019. "Development of a degradation-conscious physics-based lithium-ion battery model for use in power system planning studies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 248(C), pages 512-525.
    7. Liu, Shuai & Wei, Li & Wang, Huai, 2020. "Review on reliability of supercapacitors in energy storage applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    8. Fuquan Zhao & Fanlong Bai & Xinglong Liu & Zongwei Liu, 2022. "A Review on Renewable Energy Transition under China’s Carbon Neutrality Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.
    9. Tingli Cheng & Minyou Chen & Yingxiang Wang & Bo Li & Muhammad Arshad Shehzad Hassan & Tao Chen & Ruilin Xu, 2018. "Adaptive Robust Method for Dynamic Economic Emission Dispatch Incorporating Renewable Energy and Energy Storage," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-13, June.
    10. Briola, Stefano & Di Marco, Paolo & Gabbrielli, Roberto & Riccardi, Juri, 2016. "A novel mathematical model for the performance assessment of diabatic compressed air energy storage systems including the turbomachinery characteristic curves," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 758-772.
    11. Huang, Y. & Wang, Y.D. & Chen, Haisheng & Zhang, Xinjing & Mondol, J. & Shah, N. & Hewitt, N.J., 2017. "Performance analysis of biofuel fired trigeneration systems with energy storage for remote households," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(P3), pages 530-538.
    12. Pablo Fernández-Bustamante & Oscar Barambones & Isidro Calvo & Cristian Napole & Mohamed Derbeli, 2021. "Provision of Frequency Response from Wind Farms: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-24, October.
    13. Candra Saigustia & Sylwester Robak, 2021. "Review of Potential Energy Storage in Abandoned Mines in Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Saboori, Hedayat & Hemmati, Reza, 2017. "Maximizing DISCO profit in active distribution networks by optimal planning of energy storage systems and distributed generators," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 365-372.
    15. Klaus Eisenack & Mathias Mier, 2019. "Peak-load pricing with different types of dispatchability," Journal of Regulatory Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 105-124, December.
    16. Sui, Yunren & Lin, Haosheng & Ding, Zhixiong & Li, Fuxiang & Sui, Zengguang & Wu, Wei, 2024. "Compact, efficient, and affordable absorption Carnot battery for long-term renewable energy storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 357(C).
    17. Kebede, Abraham Alem & Kalogiannis, Theodoros & Van Mierlo, Joeri & Berecibar, Maitane, 2022. "A comprehensive review of stationary energy storage devices for large scale renewable energy sources grid integration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    18. Bilgili, Mehmet & Ozbek, Arif & Sahin, Besir & Kahraman, Ali, 2015. "An overview of renewable electric power capacity and progress in new technologies in the world," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 323-334.
    19. Karthik Tamvada & Rohit Babu, 2022. "Control of doubly fed induction generator for power quality improvement: an overview," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(6), pages 2809-2832, December.
    20. Saboori, Hedayat & Hemmati, Reza & Ghiasi, Seyyed Mohammad Sadegh & Dehghan, Shahab, 2017. "Energy storage planning in electric power distribution networks – A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1108-1121.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:23:p:6005-:d:1532268. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.